[...]d to things and are the basis of those things’ value ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->!='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali

the effect of context

="trms">matters of com="trms">position, each with a “we”='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•feeble نحيف
="lsts lst1">•experimental
="lsts lst1">•eccentric ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Elen
="lsts lst1">•habitual ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my mother
="lsts lst1">•generous
="lsts lst1">•="trms">gestural ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•half turned away
="lsts lst1">•reached the expressivity of a mood, a tone of voice
="lsts lst1">•do they lighten things or load them down='qstn'>?

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ...a com="trms">position made explicit in the figure of ='strcls'>*the active survivor='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*the knowing ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader of impacts='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a watchfulness-turned-impulse that ends not on meaning but in the haptic, multi-angled, sensorimotor qualities of a ="trms">world's un="trms">imaginable detail
(='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Varinia) qualities sensorimotor ="trms">interactions with environments that are not reducible either to thoughts and ="trms">imaginings='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*richness='lgc'>: a s="trms">cene spied provides in="trms">finite detail beyond what you can invent ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#="trms">excess
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*bodiliness='lgc'>: the motions of the body ="trms">affect sensory input
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*insubordinateness='lgc'>: the ="trms">world has a life of its own; things moved by themselves
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*grabbiness='lgc'>: sensory impacts ="trms">matter apart from their cognition
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> having a ="trms">phenomenal experience is having ="trms">skills with these qualities='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>]


an ="trms">ecology of potentialy marked by violence and care

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>]

we might='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•provide a better understanding
="lsts lst1">•provoke novel realities/="trms">ontologoes (to emerge from ="trms">material)
="lsts lst1">•provoke an understanding in the context of the everyday

='strcls'>*(="ppl">="ppl">Latour, ="ppl">Whitehead, Law='lgc'>:) ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological entity='lgc'> = ="trms">ontological entity (by ="trms">nature) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> productive of reality


to focus on practices in which all possible elements of the process must be understood as active and creative (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'># ="trms">="trms">equipment ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list)

='strcls'>*“to take ="trms">seriously"='lgc'> = to accept at a fundamental level the truth of a claim and to doggedly follow its consequences
(form an ="trms">ontological and conceptual perspective)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dogs follow consequences)
(indigenous thought is treated as a theoretical discourse on the ="trms">nature of reality ='lgc'>=/= an ="trms">interesting ="trms">interpretation of it)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to take ="trms">seriously the indigenous ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics of multi="trms">naturalism ='lgc'>[or ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] as a philosophical ="trms">intervention ='lgc'>: to trace out its effects on ='lgc'>[our='lgc'>] concepts


multiculturalism='lgc'>: a single objective universe and many cultural ="trms">interpretations of it
multi="trms">naturalism='lgc'>: multiple universes and a single mode of ="trms">interpretation (="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> perspective ='lgc'>=/= a ="trms">different “point of view” on (the same way of knowing or seeing) qualitatively ="trms">different ="trms">worlds ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='strcls'>* ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges, ='at'>#elephant parable


no='lgc'>: no ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> de-="trms">historicizing effects of imposing psycho-cognitive shamanic models of art
no ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> purely cognitive significance (of...)


='strcls'>*miniature='lgc'>: a ritual activity, a grave offering, a ="trms">sympathetic magic, a capture of the power of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> common ="trms">stories about how miniatures can be ="trms">interpreted in archaeology


(="trms">ontological research approach)_
scale is utterly important because “careful attention to alternative ="trms">ontologies of scale introduces new ="trms">interoretive possibilities for...” (="ppl">Alberti)

='strcls'>*="trms">ontology='lgc'>: the sense of a real, solid ="trms">world
='thdf'>for example the ="trms">question of “the substance of the ="trms">world”, everyone has answered that al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready (reiterating that which makes sense) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> concept of real ='lgc'>--(invent)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">cosmology (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this is not a relativizing ="trms">gesture) ='lgc'>==(force)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> production of new concepts and ="trms">materialities
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>: importance of asking the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right ="trms">questions='lgc'>: unless we do, the answers make no ="trms">difference (="ppl">Grosz)


scopes and scales ()='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “dimensionally mani="trms">fold weave of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">worlds” (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Katie) are at stake in='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">science display
="lsts lst1">•TV series
="lsts lst1">•="nms">ajayeb
="lsts lst1">•pet video
="lsts lst1">•emergent transdisciplinary scholarship
="lsts lst1">•transmedia commercial ="trms">apparatuses
="lsts lst1">•
='strcls'>*with ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading/enacting ="nms">ajayeb what is at stake is the “effectivities in realizing knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">stories” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">epistemological ="trms">affects


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]scale
="lsts lst1">•operates through intensity and not size
="lsts lst1">•emergent and performative (Jones), (juxta="trms">positions of) scales ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">interesting psychological and ="trms">phenomenological effects”
="lsts lst1">•a flat approach to scale does not separate the ="trms">social and ="trms">material, or the micro from the macro ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]size='lgc'>: (emerges as a possibility, as) one means of enacting the potential of another scale; accidental effect of intensity='lgc'>: ="trms">materialization of intensity and ="trms">excess ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> humanity='strcls'>***
="lsts lst1">•is about intensity and ="trms">excess ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> potential for visibility/invisibility and proximity to the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal condition of un="trms">differentiated, intensive ="trms">difference (='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ="nms">hayula; perfect formless form)='strcls'>***; intensive ="trms">different “h” of ="nms">hayula هیولا...
="lsts lst2">◦ه
="lsts lst2">◦‍ه‍
="lsts lst2">◦‍ه
="lsts lst2">◦ه‍


="ppl">Alberti argues for a form of ="trms">ontological ="trms">symmetry between the theory we bring to bear on our evidence and the way that ="trms">material acts as evidence (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Seba)


='strcls'>*='lgc'>[mesopotamia='lgc'>] chronically unstable bodies
a corpus of ="trms">zoo-="trms">anthropo-bio="trms">morphic artifacts and ="trms">traps
="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism manifest in distorted corporeal forms and appendages ضميمه

all ="trms">sorts of dualism are at work in the archaeological ="trms">imaginary of the region from Amazon to the Andes

marking a body ='lgc'>=/= re="trms">presentation of that act

="ppl">Alberti's arguments”
="lsts lst1">•the fantastic forms, bulges, protuberances برامدگى, and other modifications of bodies and pots express a general concern with “shoring up” or “fixing” a ="trms">world conceived of as inherently volatile فرار ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bodies (pots and people) were considered “chronically unstable”='strcls'>* ='lgc'>{pots ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intentional activation of ="trms">affective capacities in the clay; pots and bodies are “grown” in he same way='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•chaotically scale-changing, their scale is one of intensity and ="trms">excessiveness (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> figure-ground ="trms">relationship between visible/invisible, body/soul)

='strcls'>*perspectivism='lgc'>: all ="trms">species potentially share a way of knowing with humans. their “essence” or “soul” is human ='lgc'>: they see themselves as human and others as ="trms">animals
='strcls'>*to occupy a body='lgc'> = to have a perspective on the ="trms">world='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•an intensive ="trms">difference that carries the human/nonhuman ="trms">difference to the inside of every existing thing ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> there is no a ="trms">priori reason for everything not being a subject ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra='lgc'>]

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]bodies='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•bundles of ="trms">affect ='lgc'>: collection of ="trms">affects bundled into an unstable bodily form
="lsts lst1">•carrying out ="trms">specific tasks
="lsts lst1">•sensing the ="trms">world in particular way
="lsts lst1">•sharing capacities and habits with others in what keeps a body as it is and maintains its similarity to other bodies in a group
="lsts lst1">•coincident with subjectivity='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you need a body to know
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (particular ="trms">differentiation of a body='lgc'>:) body ornaments, clothing, sex, and other so-called cultural markings are no ="trms">different in kind from the so-called ="trms">natural markers of bodily ="trms">difference and capacity='lgc'>: ='strcls'>***clothes ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= claws ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">affects='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “sign and substance of capacities and dis="trms">positions” (="ppl">Alberti > Hugh-Jones > ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro)
='strcls'>*marking, molding, painting, adorning, clothing, piercing, and otherwise working on body ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> to fix a body ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> to stabilize an otherwise ="trms">wildly unpre="trms">dictable perspective and ="trms">world='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*body surfaces of spirits and humans are often brilliant and intensely marked='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">excessive corporeality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> potency of the ="trms">embodied subject='lgc'>: their “scale” ='lgc'>[in timespace tey-ol-arz='lgc'>] as efficacious beings, ="trms">dense with ="trms">affective capacities, (the body that is marked with tey-ol-arz in="trms">cites ="trms">embodied subjects)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">trap='strcls'>* (operates along scale) ='lgc'>[sufi's termporal “scale” (in tey-ol-arz طی‌الارض) as her/his efficacious being, ="trms">dense with ="trms">affective capacities for ="ppl">Attar in Tazkirat al-Awliya (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also relevant for pit-="trms">story ='at'>#="trms">measurement) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the figure of the moving sufi across scales of spacetime on geo, works as a ="trms">trap precisely along this scale ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">materialization of intensity and ="trms">excess ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> humanity='lgc'>]
='strcls'>* bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= artefacts ='lgc'>: sites of subjectivity ='strcls'>*

='strcls'>*soul='lgc'>: the capacity to transform='lgc'>: a ="trms">matter of chaning bodies

dead ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ancestor
(transformation is an ="trms">ontological event='lgc'>: “='lgc'>='lgc'>-->”), ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda
for Wari to have a soul is a sign of d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger, a sign that some transformation (of perspective) is imminent ='lgc'>[='lgc'>]

="nms">ajayeb is full of ="trms">stories of instability='lgc'>: one's soul is always vulnerable to ="trms">ontological predation by another spirit or person ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> one's perspective can always change


“cor="trms">respond” is keyword in working with ="trms">ontologies ='lgc'>: ‘="trms">interpretations cor="trms">respond with stable ="trms">ontologies’


(this we must take things as ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ="trms">ontological ='lgc'>=/= analogical (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- re="trms">presentation of a ="trms">world, an ego, etc.)

how to approach (="nms">iranian miniatur and) miniaturization='qstn'>?
miniaturization have powerful and often unsettling (because paradoxical) cognitive and perceptual effects='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> these effects (in the case of figurines) enable people to enter “other ="trms">worlds” (to think, manipulate and influence)
(in figurines) all the senses are implicated ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “perceptually explosive objects” (Bailey)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">onto-transformative effect of miniaturization
='strcls'>*="trms">anthropocentrism of the scale of the human ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> default ="trms">ontological scale, self-evident human-sized body (='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>?! the little bike i gave ="frds scrmbld">Elen, did i propose that kind of critique='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-which organs are emphasized in ="nms">iranian miniature='qstn'>?
(organs of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'>: eyes, ears, mouths, skin)
="prgrph">-properties of ="trms">materials and their ="trms">relationship to form only ever emerge ="trms">relationally ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how can i construct an approach for ="nms">iranian miniatur, or radif in these terms
="lsts lst2">◦countors ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> de="trms">composes to the shape of horses
="lsts lst2">◦gold
="lsts lst2">◦fields
 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> and these forms emerged for people ='strcls'>*who knew how to see it='strcls'>*
="nms">iranians experienced everything about the ="trms">world as ‘...’ ='qstn'>? (جای خالی را پر کنید) ='lgc'>--='strcls'>*='lgc'>-- the growth of ="trms">children in an unre="trms">liable ="trms">world نگرانی (='at'>#modalities of negarani)
inconstant and unre="trms">liable, continually threatening to transform ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">ontology involving ="trms">matter ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics

(the drama of) finding the correct scale


='strcls'>***(Bailey > ="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>:) (“paradox of multiple ="trms">worlds”='lgc'>:) when “other ="trms">worlds” are precisely what is expected by an audience for whom the ="trms">world is inherently unstable ='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this is an ="nms">iranian mode='lgc'>: ="trms">loving outsiders, construct ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics, proliferating ="nms">="nms">ajayebnameh, make belief in images, make thinking about kharej خارج, ="trms">loving America, etc.='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this was also why i couldn't think with ="frds scrmbld">Pierre's “other future” proposal; i am al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready living it


="ppl">Alberti asks='lgc'>: will an ="trms">ontological shift in scale reveal new ways of cenceptualizing the miniatures (the patterns)='qstn'>?

in ="ppl">Miyazaki the figure's size are part of an instantiation of scale rather than ="trms">respond to an imposed scale
a scale must grow indiginously


Amazonian soul <='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> harkat johari <='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> tey-ol-arz طی‌الارض ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> teleportation and tazkie nafs ='qstn'>?!
="prgrph">-designating a condition of transformability='lgc'>: all bodies contain the potential to transform into other bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intrinsic capacity to be something else ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> harkat johari حرکت جوهری
='strcls'>*tey-ol-arz ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intrinsic capacity to be somewhere else; ='lgc'>[is tey-ol-arz in ="nms">tasavof also about scale, body='qstn'>? (intensive ="trms">difference) (condition of transformability is ="trms">articulated in tey-ol-arz in terms of geo-temporal scale shift...)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a moment of indiscernibility between “here” and “there” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a super-divided being (intensive multiplicity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*(a ="trms">specific form emerges='lgc'>:) a dynamic and intensive corporeality='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">excessive intensity of all spirits) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my argument is that ="nms">tasavof is not the negation of body in favor of soul ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the key is not size or time but intensity or ="trms">excess ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> to think tey-ol-arz='lgc'>: to think in many kinds of times, flesh, vulnerability, etc.='lgc'>]
tey-ol-arz ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics is based on ='thdf'>the idea of a radical and in="trms">finite super="trms">position of states='lgc'>: insides and outsides ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= heres and theres ='lgc'>: are figures and ground to each other (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#beyond)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> there is no ="trms">interior space to the body (='lgc'>~ there is no there/beyond to the body,) just an invisible body


='at'>#work on an exposure of work with tey-ol-arz with other ="trms">interested artists
in ="nms">Tehran, maybe in my parents house, informal space for opening a discussion in ="trms">Farsi-English
(involve ="frds scrmbld">Pierre='qstn'>? where to get money='qstn'>?)
='strcls'>*campus='lgc'>: (a place where) new kinds of conversations are being invented in stabilized and ="trms">social forms (sometimes departments, sometimes just research ="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusters)
i need to make that kind of mini-scale of quasi-organization between ="nms">Tehran and Brussels='lgc'>: workshops, episodic and ="trms">travel-mediated knots of practice


='strcls'>**(="ppl">Alberti 2013 argues that) anything in the immediate, intimate vicinity of people can be subjectivized or personified through exchange and shared ="trms">affects='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an argument for ="nms">ajayeb


‘to know a thing'='lgc'> = 'to subjectivize it’ ='lgc'>: to add the maximum amount of intentionality to them (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#="trms">="trms">equip them to talk well)


pots made to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•to ="trms">communicate (to an audience)
="lsts lst1">•to establish (="trms">relationships)
="lsts lst1">•to persuade (others of their point of view)

de-subjectivization='lgc'>: sometimes (objects) left deliberately partially subjectivized, semi-potent in their potential to know and be known

="large lg6" stl="font-size:109%"> the intensely subjectivized pots ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*impede activity and enable knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>*

="lsts lst1">•convince
="lsts lst1">•avtivate
="prgrph">-
="lsts lst1">•persuade
="lsts lst1">•="trms">communicate
="lsts lst1">•establish

eyes wide open='lgc'>: inability to see the invisible

='strcls'>*to see is to be seen='strcls'>*

buried pots, ="trms">relational bodies firmly in place, teaches the dead to see properly, to maintain a perspective (Albeti)


='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
(with ="ppl">Alberti) ="trms">trap-thinking for ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to make capable of knowing ="trms">different things, invoking, quoting, reciting, citing, exicing, inciting ="trms">different kinds of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>[cit- ='lgc'>: to call, start='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobilizing ='at'>#="trms">citational ="trms">apparatuses ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they enter into a ‘type’ of ="trms">relation particular to each


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">traps(/pots)='lgc'>: bodies fully engage in perspectival ="trms">communication and battles of will, variously constructed and provided with ="trms">affects and capacities, capable of knowing ="trms">different things and of inciting ="trms">different kinds of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge through the types of ="trms">relations they entered into


______________


archaeological ="trms">material ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= myrtle (='lgc'>=/= marble)


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">ontology='lgc'>: a theory and experience of what exists


='strcls'>*hylo="trms">morphic model of production (underlined by the substance ="trms">ontology) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= marble
='lgc'>=/= myrtle
='lgc'>=/= ="nms">ajayeb's inscribings
a making which assumes that form is inscribed ="trms">onto passive ="trms">matter
that pots accrue (انباشتن منتج) meaning through their processes of manufacture and role in ="trms">social ="trms">relations
='lgc'>~ form is brought to ="trms">matter by an ="trms">agent with a design in mind (Ingold) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a concept of ="trms">material culture in which “brute ="trms">matter” is shaped by cultural ="trms">agency
traces of action ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">skilled means of re="trms">presenting a mental image
='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ‘design’ (as conventionally conceived) ='lgc'>: to ‘project’ future states


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]perspectivist theory='lgc'>: the conception ="trms">according to which the universe is inhabited by ="trms">different ="trms">sorts of persons, human and nonhuman, which apprehend reality from distinct points of view (="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro)
="prgrph">-it sug="trms">gests that there is no ="trms">interior space to the body, only super="trms">position of body and soul='lgc'>: the human form is, as it were, the body within the body, the naked primordial body ='lgc'>[="nms">hayula='lgc'>]='lgc'>--the soul of the body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in="trms">finite super="trms">position of states ='at'>#tey-ol-arz
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the body, not the mind (or ‘soul’), is the seat of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, ="trms">different parts of the body know in quite distinct ways='lgc'>: (loci/organ of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•hand knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (meken una)
="lsts lst1">•eye knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (bedu una) (particularly prominent sometimes...)
="lsts lst1">•ear knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (pabinki una)
="lsts lst1">•liver knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (taka una)
="lsts lst1">•skin knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (bitxi una) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of sun, rain and wind is acquired through the skin
(painting, ear piercing can also facilitate the absorption of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge into the body)

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= artefacts ='lgc'>: sites of subjectivity
="lsts lst1">•the body is fabricated, just like the pot ='lgc'>[="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•as ‘lived experience’ performs, ="trms">communicates and extends personhood through inscriptive and re="trms">presentational practices that fully incorporate ="trms">material culture and the surrounding ="trms">world. (Joyce)
="lsts lst1">•people are made='lgc'>: bodies are com="trms">posite transformations of artefacts from the time of myth='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[for example='lgc'>] Wari pay much attention to human bodies to ensure proper growth, which is regarded as a collective ="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: they are moulded and shaped by kin from foetus through to adult. actions carried out on the body, such as massage, painting and piercing ='lgc'>[and negarani of ="nms">iranian mother='lgc'>] are seen to have profound and lasting effects
="lsts lst1">•each being is stabilized through acts of care ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what are babies for ="nms">iranians (and ="nms">iranian mothers)='qstn'>? ='lgc'>{='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: dis="trms">positions or capacities which render the body of every ="trms">species unique='lgc'>: what it eats, how it moves, how it ="trms">communicates, where it lives, whether it is gregarious دسته اى or solitary ='lgc'>==(such practices ensure that)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>**individuals act and see in the same ways as their kin='strcls'>** ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is this what mother does='qstn'>? (has to do with the ability or threat of transformation='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='strcls'>*='at'>#practices of care and نگرانی negarani are the production of a distinctly human body ='lgc'>~ ="trms">naturally human ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">different bodily constitutions of the subject ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">different ="trms">worlds

a process that crucially entailed inconstancy='lgc'>: a continuous creative ="trms">response to the exigencies of somatic uncertainty and ="trms">ontological risk ='lgc'>=/= intentional image into a realized product (a bad ="trms">story of ="trms">technology)

let's resist='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the vessel ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor
="lsts lst1">•the body's dual character as biological and cultural

archaeologists’ understanding of what bodies and artefacts are ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a model (based on analogy) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “pot ='lgc'>=/= body”


='strcls'>****sex and aging, defined as the real “physical characteristics” of the body that underpin human experiences ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> usually remains unaltered
(for instance check the TV series Six Feet Under, how David's gay-ness is an intrinsic absolute fact of his body that underpins all his experiences)


we “wear”='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•sex
="lsts lst1">•aging
="lsts lst1">•personal feelings
="lsts lst1">•="nms">Iranian, or German, (basically being anything)
="lsts lst1">•


(basically in all Hollywood ="trms">imaginings and standard archaeology) artefacts are only assigned secondary ="trms">agency ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">animacy is not considered as inherent attribute of the artefactual ='strcls'>*** (Gell)
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pots as living organisms subject to processes of growth


(Ingold's) ="trms">ecology of ="trms">materials is characteristic of work that focuses on the inherent vitality of things (="ppl">="ppl">Barad)

='strcls'>*production='lgc'>: an ongoing process that produces both maker and object


(="ppl">Alberti proposes) a change in focus='lgc'>: (from) ='strcls'>*stopped up objects='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--(to)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*leaky things='strcls'>*


in his ="trms">writing ="ppl">Alberti finishes 3 or 4 times his paragraphs with the same characterization of his field='lgc'>: “chronic instability of a ="trms">world constantly at risk of transformation”


“if everything can be human, then nothing is human in a clear and distinct way.”
="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]subjectivity='lgc'>: a condition and outcome of all ="trms">affective ="trms">relations ='lgc'>=/= a capacity that can be awakened in a seemingly inert thing
='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>?! ="trms">transference, (is ="trms">transference an object-oriented account='qstn'>?)


the active ="trms">nature of ="trms">materials refers to their recognized capacity to escape form ='lgc'>: their untrustworthiness


(a paradime for creative arts='lgc'>:) artifactual production ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">animal creativity

(in Amazonia, and) in ="nms">ajayeb, no distinction is made between thoughts, feelings, body and mind ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> thoughts and actions happen in the same ="trms">ontological space
(="ppl">Alberti > ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

shift from an ="trms">epistemological to an ="trms">ontological register in theoretical archaeology

critically ="trms">ontological='lgc'>: turning insight back on the archaeological project

(in archaeology='lgc'>:) ="trms">ontology='lgc'> = reality (what there is) / peoples’ claims about reality (a fundamental set of understandings about how the ="trms">world is) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>='lgc'>--> one can conceptualize ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: as a people's “beliefs about” reality / as people's actual ="trms">ontological commitments (='lgc'>~ people's reality)

="ppl">="ppl">Latour's modes of existence='lgc'>: ="trms">ontological tendencies that exist more or less precariously under the assault of ="trms">modernization

conversion of ="trms">ontological ="trms">questions into ="trms">epistemological ="trms">questions ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> de="trms">ontologizing other peoples’ ='strcls'>*="trms">ontological commitments='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Godard">Goda mistook for ideology='lgc'>]

='strcls'>*problem with p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">luralizing “reality” is that it might appear to be a form of cultural relativism, (demotion of) “="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= culture (='lgc'>~ cultural beliefs about reality ='lgc'>=/= reality)” ='lgc'>==back='lgc'>='lgc'>==> cultural construction


anti-="ppl">Cartesian, ="trms">relational, and anti="trms">ontological exceptionalism


='lgc'>[a='lgc'>] ="ppl">Heideggerian idea='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*the ="trms">world we encounter is pre="trms">interpretive='strcls'>*

posthuman ='lgc'>~ nonre="trms">presentational ='lgc'>~ rea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ='lgc'>~ new ="trms">materialism

(realism='lgc'>: an ="trms">ontological approach)

="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Latour's ="trms">network
="lsts lst1">•Ingold's meshwork (commonality of processes across the ‘life ='lgc'>=/= not life’) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> processes ='lgc'>~ becoming ='lgc'>~ growth ='lgc'>~ decay
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Barad's entanglement (="trms">relations are primary and ="trms">relata are a consequence of relating ='lgc'>==dynamics='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">intra-action ='lgc'>{="trms">phenomenon='lgc'> = experiment ='lgc'>+ ="trms">measuring device ='lgc'>+ techician ='lgc'>+ previous results ='lgc'>+ setting ='lgc'>+ ...='lgc'>})
="lsts lst1">•DeLanda's assemblage (how humans and nonhumans produced ="trms">communities that changed in com="trms">position and through time... ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">linguistic model of context)
="lsts lst1">•

='strcls'>**="trms">relational ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>: stronger your “allies” are, the more reality you can claim='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[= (="ppl">="ppl">Latour's notion of) truth='lgc'>]

='lgc'>[critique of human exceptionalism ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>] open ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">contingent ="trms">categories='lgc'>: ="trms">phenomena and assemblages are temporary, ="trms">contingent, and unbounded

flat ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: one made ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively of unique, singular individuals, differing in spatio-temporal scale but not in ="trms">ontological status ='lgc'>--="trms">symmetry='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*to get at ="trms">differences without determining what they are in advance='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- useful for ="nms">ajayeb studies)
="lsts lst1">•archaeological types/objects='lgc'>: reified sets of ="trms">relations
="lsts lst1">•job of the archaeologists='lgc'>: establish alternative taxonomies of being

ruin ="trms">memories

nonre="trms">presentational ='lgc'>=/=='lgc'>{"="trms">world of ideas ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">world of things” ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= the ideas must cor="trms">respond to a truth de="trms">monstrable in the ="trms">world of things='lgc'>}

(Lucas's) ="trms">materialization='lgc'>: we can still say things about the ="trms">past with great certainty

theories ='lgc'>+ ="trms">apparatuses ='lgc'>+ ="trms">material remains

="trms">ontological realism ='lgc'>--claim='lgc'>='lgc'>--> objectivity and truth may be ="trms">contingent but are nonetheless de="trms">monstrable and robust

archaeologist ="trms">ontological approach='lgc'>: working on “="trms">material ="trms">pasts in the ="trms">present” ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ‘how ="trms">past actually gathers in the ="trms">present’ ='lgc'>=/= “="trms">material record='lgc'> = fragmentary evidence of ="trms">history”
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">material's temporary sensitivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]residue='lgc'>: ='thdf'>the idea of ="trms">memory objects, ="trms">material entities in which the ="trms">memory of a moment in time is recorded

(it is precisely the) ="trms">past ='lgc'>--endures-in='lgc'>='lgc'>--> assemblage


="trms">interpretive endeavors ='lgc'><='lgc'>--characterize='lgc'>-- extension of the meaning of the ="trms">social
="lsts lst1">•="trms">ontology as a new ="trms">interpretive tool
="lsts lst1">•additive (='lgc'>=/= reconstructive)

="ppl">Alberti's approach (in ="trms">ontological equivalence of bodies and pots in ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic ceramics from northwest Argentina...)='lgc'>:
="trms">social ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reconstruct the ="trms">ontologies of ="trms">past ="trms">societies ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>~='lgc'>~ ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>]

="trms">ontological archaeology's background in feminism, queer, and ="trms">phenomenological
approaches ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">interest in the body


influence of the ="trms">animal turn in archaeology
non="trms">anthropocentric ="trms">zoological studies

(nomenological explorations of ="trms">animal re="trms">presentations in ="ppl">Attar and ="nms">tasavof)

what kinds of beings existed within the ="trms">social universe of pre-Columbian Andean peoples

(renovated concept of) animism='lgc'>: ethnographic ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-analogy for ="trms">past ="trms">ontologies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> models of ="trms">relationality for archaeologists to ="trms">interpret ="trms">material patterning in the archaeological record

investigations of personhood

(building toward a) taxonomy of ="trms">past ="trms">ontologies ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ontological critique

="large lg26" stl="font-size:106%"> (="ppl">Alberti >) ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro's project='lgc'>: to ="trms">systemize amerindian thought into a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics such that it can have a reciprocal effect on ="trms">anthropological thought and “="trms">natura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list” or Western ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics



="trms">ontological realism ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>{

new ="trms">language attempt to ="trms">imagine the complex topology of ="trms">relational realities='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Latour ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">network='lgc'>: things exists as a consequence of the strength of their ="trms">articulation
="lsts lst1">•Ingold ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> meshwork ='lgc'>=/= Aristotelian hylo="trms">morphism
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Barad ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> entanglement='lgc'> = Quantum physics ='lgc'>+ queer theory ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> properties belong to the ="trms">phenomena in ="trms">question ='lgc'>=/= inherent to things
="lsts lst1">•DeLanda ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> assemblage='lgc'>: how humans ='lgc'>+ nonhumans produced ="trms">communities that changed in com="trms">position and through time in neolithic and bronze age

assemblage ='lgc'>--replace='lgc'>='lgc'>--> context

assemblage='lgc'> = ="trms">phenomena ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> temporary, ="trms">contingent, unbounded

="ppl">="ppl">Latourian critique of ="trms">categories ='lgc'>=/= beyond human cor="trms">relationalism

p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">luralizing ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> charges of relativism ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ‘objective knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">contingent foundations’ ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> nonre="trms">presentational approach ='lgc'>=/= over ="trms">interpretation, abstraction

="trms"nttrm="search">archeology operates by seeking strong and effective ="trms">articulations between theories, ="trms">apparatuses, ="trms">material remains

="trms">ontological realism (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">naturalism, constructivist) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> objectivity and truth are ="trms">contingent, but also de="trms">monstrable and robust
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Chloe


="trms">material record='lgc'>: an expression of ='strcls'>**how ="trms">past gathers in the ="trms">present='strcls'>** (='lgc'>=/= fragmentary evidence of ="trms">history ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- forensic approach)

="trms">past continuously un="trms">folding and therefore changing


Alberi ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="trms">social) ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: a new ="trms">interpretive tool
additive work (='lgc'>=/= reconstructive)

="trms"nttrm="search">archeological accounts of other's ="trms">ontologies

="trms">animal turn in ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> non="trms">anthropocentric ="trms">zoological studies
Willerselv
="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro

Amazona ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> animism (more than any other ="trms">anthropological ="trms">material) has provided modes of ="trms">relationality to ="trms"nttrm="search">archeologists to ="trms">interpret ="trms">material patterning in ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological records ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]animism='lgc'>: an ethnographic ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-analogy for ="trms">past ="trms">ontologies
="lsts lst1">•b="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurring between ="trms">nature and culture
="lsts lst1">•="trms">relationship with other-than-human ="trms">agencies (="trms">animal, spirit, artifact)
='lgc'>==='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">ontological critique

="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">systemize amerindian thought into a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> to have an reciprocal effect on ="trms">anthropological thought (western ="trms">natura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics)

reference to a “common ="trms">world”

new animism ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">ontology becomes another name for culture

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alex,Alert,Aleph,Alessi">Alebrti outlining='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">anthropological project that considers ="trms">ontology as a critical ="trms">question productive of conceptual engagement
="lsts lst1">•work of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeologists who theorize and practice ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology on the basis of indigenous theories
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where new animists turn to animism for a source of analogies, critical ="trms">ontology turns to animism for a source of theory

perspectivism='lgc'>: multiple ="trms">natures (="trms">worlds) ='lgc'>+ singular culture (way of knowing those ="trms">worlds) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ working from ='strcls'>*commonality='strcls'>* rather than ='strcls'>*alterity='strcls'>*='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a theoretical bomb ='lgc'>=/= analogies based on ethnographic content

spirits experienced as diminutive yet brilliantly decorated or huge and grotesque

the more intense ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the more body it is

(the promise of thinking through) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]thing='lgc'>: a non="trms">specified ="trms">ontological ="trms">category that can be “filled” through ethnographic observation that is designed to allow ="trms">ontological alterity to inform its content

recursive ="trms">anthropology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> alterity='lgc'>: a function of the divergence between ethnographic ="trms">materials and the assumptions the analyst brings to them

(if) ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: what is ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> alterity='lgc'>: part of what others say ‘what is’ that does not make sense to us


(the d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger of) a new ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">ontological orthodoxy becoming a immutable ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysic

="trms"nttrm="search">archeological alterity='lgc'>: things that do not make sense ="trms">ontologically (escape traditional frameworks)

="trms"nttrm="search">archeology's new kind of reflexivity
="lsts lst1">•openness
="lsts lst1">•="trms">wonder='lgc'>: an intentional naivete, naive ="trms">="trms">empiricism (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> sustain altering ='lgc'>+ enabling meaning, to be besieged ='and'>& committed to ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">Cinderella ='lgc'>=/= moving beyond)
="lsts lst1">•emphasis on descriptive ='lgc'>=/= theoretical
="lsts lst1">•attentiveness to our ="trms">embodied ="trms">responses

(a ="trms">question of critical ="trms">ontology in ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) how are we to mobilize ='and'>& manifest (describe ='and'>& transform) the new ="trms">past from things='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- my ="trms">question in ='mywrk'>my research on ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•how i am subjectively involved in the ="trms">past we investigate
="lsts lst1">•how i am objectively part of those ="trms">pasts


the all encompassing (nonlinear) descriptive ="trms">writings of ancient and antiquarian ="trms">travelers ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is encountered imposes itself ='lgc'>==force='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a choice ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> description

kinetic activity ='lgc'>+ the experience of being in the field

="trms">aesthetic attentiveness of ="trms">bestiaries


="trms">pragmatic use of the word ="trms">ontology in ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>--signal='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the potential ="trms">world-shifting ="trms">nature of what is being studied

to be ="trms">ontological='lgc'> = entirety of the analytical ="trms">apparatus and what is being studied should be in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded in the analysis
(caught up in the process='lgc'>:) the object of study ='lgc'>+ analytical scaf="trms">folding ='lgc'>+ ="trms">method ='lgc'>+ analyst

the degree to which an approach is willing to do ="trms">ontology to itself (investigate its own ="trms">ontological assumptions)

="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>+ ="trms">ontological ="trms">anthropology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> perspective on reality


(assign things to preexisting conceptual structures ='lgc'>=/=) looking for ways things can have an impact on your thinking, concepts, ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> unlocking what is most “of the ="trms">past” about things

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Alberti
Ingold

cor="trms">respondence='lgc'>: (a pre-conceptual practice ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ="trms">epistemological intimacy in the practices of art, ="trms">science, and ="trms">anthropology
="lsts lst1">•a way to understand one's own research process

(="trms"nttrm="search">archeology='lgc'>: a ="trms">science of cor="trms">respondence)

="ppl">Alberti sug="trms">gesting to separate arts and ="trms">crafts (for analytical purposes)

artwork='lgc'>: non-conceptual outcomes of practice

artwork ='and'>& ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological things ='lgc'>--share='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ontological problem of how to make something new ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ ='strcls'>*sensations/="trms">past never before experienced/thought='strcls'>*='lgc'>] out of (circumscribed body of) ="trms">materials

="trms"nttrm="search">archeological things carry both sensation ='and'>& ='strcls'>*residue of concepts='strcls'>* with them (='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~> artistic research ='lgc'>=/= artworks)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> resurrect the conceptual potential immanent to the ="trms">specific arrangement of ="trms">materials (and their temporary forms)

(="trms">ontological dilemma ='lgc'>[of both art and ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology='lgc'>]='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*how to anticipate the coming into being of something sensed but as yet not thought='qstn'>?='strcls'>*
(='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor)

="large lg14" stl="font-size:122%"> ="trms">scientific ="trms">interpretation and explanation of the ="trms">past ='lgc'><-='lgc'>~ ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology
='lgc'>{='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>: speculative ="trms">interpretation and explanation of the ="trms">past ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> prefigure new becomings ='lgc'>+ intensification and unleashing of ‘i am part of what i seek to understand’ (= my subjectivity)='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=/= lock the ="trms">past into pre="trms">dictability='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•my ‘things’ in ="nms">ajayeb are to an extent ‘="trms"nttrm="search">archeological things’

contemporary ="trms">science ='lgc'>--gives='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ontologically ="trms">relational ="trms">world (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- to be acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edged by art and ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology)

="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>--="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fostering ='strcls'>**a particular sensibility to what is of the ="trms">past in things='strcls'>**

="trms">anthropology='lgc'>: the art of inquiry
(something you can learn from)

="large lg10" stl="font-size:120%"> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms"nttrm="search">archeological sensibility='lgc'>: a ="trms">pervasive set of attitudes towards traces and remains, towards ="trms">memory, time and temporality, the fabric of ="trms">history
="prgrph">-Shanks

="trms">craft ='lgc'>--Ingold='lgc'>='lgc'>--> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge grow from the crucible of our practical and observational engagement with being and things
(="ppl">Aristotlean ="trms">poiesis ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">craft='lgc'>: slow and intimate knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edgeable work (of how we get along with the ="trms">world; that cultivates in oneself the ="trms">skill for discerning the ='strcls'>*meanings that are al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready there='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ontological paring of conceptual ="trms">language ='and'>& physical condition
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> meaning and concepts are drawn out of objects (not given to them)


="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Haraway ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> companion ="trms">species='lgc'> = biologist ='lgc'>+ creatures
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Barad ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> concepts are ="trms">literally ="trms">embodied by the differing physical ="trms">apparatuses
="lsts lst1">•


(we need more) art='lgc'>: careful accumulation of ="trms">skills


21st century ="trms">historiographic trends in art

artists increasingly ='strcls'>*deploy simulacra of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological practices and motifs='strcls'>* in their work


art practiced as ="trms">craft (but not all the time) ='lgc'>==allow='lgc'>='lgc'>==> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge grow from the insight of being in the ="trms">folding of life ='lgc'>[of infantile grandious fantasy, as well='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ="trms">anthropology

producing contemporary ruins to draw attention to ='strcls'>*the work of the ="trms">present in the production of the ="trms">past='strcls'>*

='strcls'>*artists take ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology as muse='strcls'>*
(through borrowing from ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology artists)
="lsts lst1">•create a kind of intellectual framing
="lsts lst1">•incorporate archival research
="lsts lst1">•themes of ="trms">memory and entropy
="lsts lst1">•="trms">question of absence
="lsts lst1">•

="large lg22" stl="font-size:103%">
prosaic ="trms">nature of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological research
production of the finds


the way Dion distorts ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological work (allegorizing ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological practice) ='lgc'>--="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•consequence of sleight of hand
="lsts lst1">•he is dibbling at, performing being an ="trms"nttrm="search">archeologist
="lsts lst1">•‘play at’ ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology
='lgc'>=/= Simon Callery

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> ="ppl">Alberti > Russell
transform ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology from ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor to allegory ='lgc'>--play='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology-as-="trms">aesthetics through performance ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> risk of undermining and reinforcing art as a subjective practice concerned with only ="trms">aesthetics and ="trms">affective='lgc'>]


="trms">craft='lgc'>: a model for careful practices and knowing the ="trms">world ='lgc'>=/= artwork='lgc'>: a model for how to break out of disciplinary frames and how to think of the ="trms">ontology of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeolog[...]