[...]ded to assist a dead person's journey through under="trms">world, and into the afterlife and ="trms">written by many priests
="prgrph">-are ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">writing='qstn'>? (...way before the installation of the ="trms">modern scriptural ="trms">apparatus)
theory-minded academics have ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorously repudiated='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--or forgotten ="trms">poetry. ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> ="trms">poetic deprogrammmg
cohabitation of two sovereign ="trms">linguistic attitudes='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--the grammars and behaviors that we as="trms">sociate with figures of ="trms">literary performance and philosophical ="trms">positing
18th century
rise of increasingly more mathematical and ="trms">symbolic logics
more ="trms">literary types of discursive formations,
="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
="ppl">Wordsworth, ="ppl">Rilke, and ="ppl">Keats disavowing ="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Freud without ="ppl">Goethe or ="ppl">Schiller='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Benjamin off ="ppl">Baudelaire='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Derrida deprived of ="ppl">Mallarme, Ponge, or ="ppl">Celan='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Heidegger abandoned by Trakl or ="ppl">Holderlin='qstn'>?!
increasing ="trms">technicization of critical ="trms">language
colloquy, soliloquy
they are called to witness distinct regions of being ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> assuming the destiny of ="trms">difference
='prcnt'>% denken und dichten is at stake in the ='strcls'>*theory of mourning
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>]
the ="trms">storyteller ='lgc'>: “some people ="trms">love to divide and classify, while others are bridge-makers='lgc'>--weaving ="trms">relations that ='strcls'>**turn a divide into a living contrast='strcls'>**, one whose power is to ="trms">affect, to produce thinking and feeling”
(regarding my footnote fetish) ... because ="trms">writing such footnotes implies ='strcls'>*feeling the text='strcls'>* as an ='strcls'>*animating power='strcls'>*
philosophy ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? a form of textual animation ='lgc'>{='lgc'>='lgc'>--> approaching the work of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>}
to turn the ='lgc'>[="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] (animist) modes of experience (existence), awareness, and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge into living contrasts (intensely powerful bridge-making tools)
can we reappropriate without reanimate='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> i think if we deconstructively talk about the reappropriations of meaning we might allow animation to constitute itself.
="prgrph">-how to train yourself in spotting relevant ="trms">questions and unilaterally ='lgc'>[einseitig='lgc'>] imposed ="trms">questions='qstn'>? (their ="trms">differences) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~='qstn'>? mofti مفتی, fatva فتوا ='lgc'>=/= khotbe خطبه='lgc'>]
(to put the ‘="trms">question’ at risk)
='strcls'>*milieu-thinking='strcls'>* (to think by the milieu) ='lgc'>:
1. no reference to the ground
2. never separating from milieu
(Virgin Mary requires a milieu ='lgc'>[of ="trms">symbolic efficacy, ="trms">categories of belief, etc.='lgc'>])
what is the milieu of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>? (ghalamrov قلمرو, mohite ejtemayi محیط اجتمایی, its ="trms">ecology)
“="trms">natural”='lgc'>: that which ="trms">science will eventually explain ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">nature ='lgc'>=/= “="trms">natural”
“="trms">nature”='lgc'>: that larger, older, and wiser con="trms">figuration that gets credit for ingenuity (instead of the creature's bodily know-how) by the call of the ="trms">scientist
عجایب ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">relations to the ="trms">world, rhizomatic connections to other practices that likewise explore a ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphic (rather than re="trms">presentational) ="trms">relation
="large lg1" stl="font-size:130%">
Earth ='lgc'>=/= cradle
Surrea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists’ automatism to cultivate lucid trances is missing the ="trms">techniques of ="trms">imagination developed by ="ppl">Ibn ="ppl">Arabi, (or by ="ppl">Sohrevardi, and others)
(="ppl">Breton's subjectivity is still hopelessly European)
='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> to recuperate our physical force (old good Tasavof-='qstn'>?)
‘ideas’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to “animate” humans ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">erotically ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure the human soul='strcls'>**
(="ppl">Plato knew this)
to ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure us into relevant ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphic attention='strcls'>*
(="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari='lgc'>:) my existence is my very participation in assemblages
in order to determine what is “really” ="trms">responsible for what ='lgc'>[= ="trms">agency='qstn'>?='lgc'>].
="prgrph">-an ="trms">agency that doesn't belong to us (who is ‘us’ in ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='qstn'>?)
the efficacy of assemblages (in ="nms">ajayeb)
(assemblage ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> landscape ='lgc'>[in ="trms">farsi='lgc'>: چشم انداز cheshm-andaz, is related not to the land but to the eyes, ="trms">literally meaning the projection of gaze='lgc'>])
(the point is) to play a referential game that puts one at risk (instead of protecting via quote)
(let's immediately turn off that) monotonous little critical or reflexive voice whispering that (the only defense we have against fanaticism and the rule of illusions is that) we should not accept being mystified
commenting ='lgc'>=/= touching
(lams kardan لمس کردن ='lgc'>=/= ezhare nazar kardan اظهار نظر کردن) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an issue in art criticism in ="nms">Iran ایران
='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>]
='strcls'>**our senses are not for detached cognition but for participation='strcls'>**(="ppl">David ="ppl">Abram)
="prgrph">-“The ways the senses themselves have, of throwing themselves beyond what is immediately given, in order to make tentative contact with the other sides of things that we do not sense directly, with the hidden or invisible aspects of the sensible.”
="prgrph">-“sug="trms">gestions offered by the sensible itself.”
="prgrph">-we never step outside the “flux of participation.”
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[Thomas ="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>]
="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='lgc'>: that which happens when we cannot apply the rules ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> experience of ="trms">responsibility ='lgc'>=/= moment of security or cognitive certainty
="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading
who speaks, ="trms">writes, and ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads='qstn'>? not simply humans
“how can we have any chance of finding a way to say what we don't know how to say if we don't pay attention to the silence of the other inside us='qstn'>?”
="trms">literature, is then understood as the experience of risk, chance, the undecidable ='lgc'>=/= pathos of resolution
(in Western ethical, political, and ="trms">literary traditions='lgc'>:) ="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: a ="trms">matter of ="trms">articulating what is known with what is done ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*="trms">responsibility='strcls'>*='lgc'>: an a="trms">symmetry or an ="trms">interruption between the orders of cognition and action
="trms">fable ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an exemplary ='strcls'>*allegory of decision='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~> installing or restoring subjectivity)
="trms">fables open ="trms">abyssal aporias='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•to teach ‘singularity’ it offers ‘comparison’
="lsts lst1">•to underline ‘independence’ it re="trms">sorts to ‘necessity’
='lgc'>[(the experience of) aporia ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> morality, politics, ="trms">responsibility ='lgc'>=/= when the path is given='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Germany is moving towards the removing of aporia ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a general panic popular in sci-fi='lgc'>]
(the very condition of possibility of) ='strcls'>*="trms">responsibility='strcls'>*='lgc'>: a certain experience of the possibility of the impossible ='lgc'>~ aporia ='lgc'>}='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> the impossible invention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">responsibility must be an invention='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[-Germany's notion of law='lgc'>: like any idea of law, are not by themselves motivators for morality or immorality, it is really upon (human) culture to do that.='lgc'>]
="trms">fable ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> possibility of another kind of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> exposure to something that breaks with the regimes of meaning and sense
politics of difficulty
...to fall back on the conceptual ="trms">priority of the subject, ="trms">agency, or identity as the grounds ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we have politics because we have no ground
(="ppl">Keenan sug="trms">gests) “deconstruction” is not offered here as an anti="trms">authoritarian discourse, an attack on grounds, but as an attempt to think about this removal as the condition of any (political) action ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>~= democracy
(="trms">according to ="trms">fables) ="trms">responsibility begins in the bad example (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the concept of conflict ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>=> the ethics and politics of ="trms">responsibility)
the classical subject ='lgc'>--(the passage through the bad example)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> installed in its stance of ="trms">responsibility and the safety of identity
“What is at stake in the ="trms">fable is, more than anything else, the ="trms">interpretation and practice of ="trms">responsibility-our exposure to calls, others, and the names with which we are constituted and which put us in ="trms">question.” (="ppl">Keenan)
...practical effectivity of ="trms">literature
="lsts lst1">•(for Annabel Patterson='lgc'>:) ="trms">fable accomplishes a speculative Aufhebung ='lgc'>: “='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]the role of ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor is to mediate between human consciousness and human survival, ='lgc'>[and here='lgc'>] the mind recognizes rock bottom, the irreducibly ="trms">material, by rejoining the ="trms">animals, one of whom is the human body”
="lsts lst1">•(for Louis Marin='lgc'>:) ="trms">fable='lgc'>: uncertain model of praxis
="lsts lst1">•(for ="ppl">Hegel='lgc'>: Aesop was a “misshapen humpbacked slave” and his) ="trms">fable='lgc'> = witty, witzig ='lgc'>=/= spirit, depth, insight, vision, ="trms">poetry, philosophy
="lsts lst1">•(for ="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>:) ="trms">fable='lgc'>: a name for the ="trms">mutual implication and a="trms">symmetrical ="trms">interference of ="trms">literature with philosophy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the suspension of the self-evidence of the ="trms">categories “="trms">literature” and “philosophy” in order to use each to put the identity of the other into ="trms">question. ='lgc'>[to think the ="trms">world as ="trms">fable. Is it possible='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•(for ="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>:) ="trms">fable superimposes the ="trms">relation of an address to the other in its singularity and in its anonymity (="trms">responsibility for the other) ="trms">onto the traditional predicament of an ="trms">articulation between the order of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge or cognition and that of action, ethico-political or otherwise ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">responsibility in Western philosophical tradition='lgc'>: an address to an other='strcls'>*
...the ="trms">rhetorical event of a comparison
='at'>#='lgc'>[the theater of example='lgc'>]
the threat of example's ="trms">excess
="trms">fables of ="trms">responsibility ='lgc'>==securing='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ='strcls'>*the morality of the subject who means='strcls'>* (who can they finally be submitted to the logic of an ='strcls'>*evaluative destination='strcls'>*)
(="ppl">Derrida's) mode of ="trms">enunciation and the ="trms">literary vehicle entrusted with its exemplification ='lgc'>:
='strcls'>*='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]it is sufficient to introduce, into the ="trms">fold of speech acts, a few wolves of the type (“undecidability” or “unconscious”) for the shepherd to lose track of his sheep='lgc'>: one is no longer certain where to find the identity of the “speaker” or the “hearer,” ... where to find the identity of an intention.='strcls'>*
='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> wolf in sheep's clothing ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also the problem/fantasy of the “="trms">integration” project (as the space of ethics and politics)='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~>(“Appearances are deceptive” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the parasite ='lgc'>+ identification of subjects as the task of ="trms">responsibility); -what would mean for the German shepherd to lose track of his sheeps='qstn'>? (to go from) the ="trms">fable of ='strcls'>*the oriented sheep="trms">fold='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">fable of ='strcls'>*losing count='strcls'>*='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-the vexed ="trms">relation between sheep and wolf, slave and master
(='mywrk'>my work is all about='lgc'>: can we please look at) some ='strcls'>*other='strcls'>* “="trms">interior of the ="trms">system”
(="trms">system never has only one ="trms">interior ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= conspiracy='lgc'>: ="trms">system's singular ="trms">interiority='lgc'>])
="lsts lst1">•="trms">literature's (ir)="trms">responsibility to philosophy
="lsts lst1">•art's (ir)="trms">responsibility to journalism
Xanthus the philosopher decides to buy a slave, goes with his students to the slave ="trms">market, and encounters the disfigured Phrygian Aesop (recently granted the power of speech after assisting a priestess of Isis and hence become too difficult for his previous master to handle). Their first exchange is exemplary, as the philosopher ="trms">interrogates the slave in order to determine whether “he knows anything,” receives equivocal replies, and finishes by asking, “Do you want me to buy you='qstn'>?”
(Life of Aesop)
thinking ="trms">fable as ="trms">language ='lgc'>: ‘="trms">Fabula’ (="trms">narration or account), derived as it is from the Latin root ‘fari’ (to speak) and linked to the ="trms">Greek ‘phanai’ (to speak or to say), finally implies nothing other than ="trms">language as such
Mythos and logos, the one is not more true (or more false, deceptive, ="trms">fictive, etc.) than the other
(to open to the) alterity of an ungoverned ="trms">figuration
hero='lgc'>: the adventure of an identification that can only occur in the comparison that a ="trms">fable ="trms">demands
Horace's dictum='lgc'>: “with a change of names, the ="trms">fable is told about you” (a trans-subjective movement, a tropological ="trms">system ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor or metonymy, )
(for ="ppl">Nietzsche) ="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: the ability to make and keep one's promises='lgc'> = being (able to be) held accountable (not simply by another but) al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready in advance by and for oneself ='lgc'>: to answer to oneself in the place of the other
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Nietzsche's ="trms">fable of morality='lgc'>: lamb ='and'>& ="trms">bird of prey (“eagle is evil ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> lambs are good”)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[the ="trms">fable enacts the victory:='lgc'>] the lambs triumph in gaining the ability (and then the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right) to hold the ="trms">birds of prey ="trms">responsible for doing what they do, for being what they are ='lgc'>--claim='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the strong man is fee to be weak, the ="trms">bird of prey free to be a lamb ='lgc'>==gain='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right to make the ="trms">bird of prey accountable for being a ="trms">bird of prey
="lsts lst2">◦morality='lgc'>: a ="trms">fabulous ="trms">narrative about ="trms">language and how it gets turned (with ="trms">animals playing its roles) into an ethical and ="trms">epistemological ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the medium of the exploitation (='strcls'>*putting to use or the abuse of a ="trms">linguistic possibility='strcls'>*)
="lsts lst2">◦the ="trms">interpretation or institution of the ="trms">birds as subjeets (choosing, willing
="trms">agents) depends on a ="trms">fiction, a ="trms">fable='lgc'>: the doer is merely a ="trms">fiction added to the deed
='lgc'>==="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>=='lgc'>=>
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: an exploitation of a ="trms">verbal possibility='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*="trms">fable='lgc'>: turning the merely grammatical subject into the ="trms">fiction of the acting='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ="trms">zoo="trms">morphism (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism)
="trms">fable of the eagle and the raven
the ="trms">story of the raven that, having once watched with envy as an eagle snatched a lamb from the flock and carried it off, later attempts a similar feat. But a raven is not an eagle, and his claws get stuck in the fleece of a wether (not a lamb)='lgc'>: his prey becomes his ="trms">trap. He is captured by the shepherd, his wings are broken and taken from him, and he is given to the shepherd's ="trms">children as a plaything
="lsts lst1">•identity check
="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">bird begins the ="trms">fable without (knowing) its name
="lsts lst1">•establishment of the raven as an (ir)="trms">responsible ="trms">agent, one that can be called to ="trms">respond for itself ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an “I” has a name and a choice about its action, because it could have done otherwise
="lsts lst1">•raven's errancy consists precisely in wandering away from its name ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- in the ="trms">past ='lgc'>=/= now (now I know well that i am a rauen) we can act ="trms">responsibly
="lsts lst1">•act in ="trms">accord with the fate prescribed for you by your name ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> restore the proper name ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> establishment of the ="trms">responsible ="trms">agent
="lsts lst1">•critical ="trms">system of “error ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> correction ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> I='lgc'> = name” ='lgc'>==fix='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> the link between the order of cognition (whether false ="trms">supposition or true knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge) ='and'>& that of action (take a lamb / as
the eagle did)
="lsts lst1">•don't compare yourself with what you are not ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader is you are asked to compare yourself with the raven (follow its example)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">fable of ="trms">responsibility='lgc'> = a ="trms">story about ="trms">language and its d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger (raven may be like an eagle, but it is not an eagle) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “know your name ='lgc'>+ do what it say” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: the ="trms">response to the name by which one is called='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>the idea that ='strcls'>*="trms">supposing ='and'>& knowing='strcls'>* belong to one and the same homogeneous ="trms">system='strcls'>*
(the art of) ="trms">supposition='lgc'>: disguise, false knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (guess, surmise, premise)
='lgc'>--or='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ungovernable and unrecoverable force of ='strcls'>*="trms">positing='strcls'>* (="trms">position or im="trms">position)
(generation of the pure name in ="trms">fable of the eagle and the raven='lgc'>:)
non-="trms">symmetrical movement from nameless ="trms">bird ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">birdless name (a wingless not-eagle)
why ="trms">fables are important='qstn'>? ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- others and their traces are always working within us al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready, in a space and time that cannot be reduced to that of consciousness (or self-="trms">presence)
="lsts lst1">•profound ="trms">linguistic or ="trms">rhetorical complexity of the call and ="trms">response
the raven resounds (it does not just start talking) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- it starts with the others='lgc'>: eagle, wether, shepherd
Lacoue Labarthe ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> identification (the self-becoming of the Self) has always been thought as a ="trms">matter of examples (='lgc'>+ their appropriation) ='lgc'>--raven='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (paradoxical imperative) “imitate me in order to be what you are”
wolf in sheep's clothing (Aesop's “A Case of Mistaken Identity”)
a wolf thought that by disguising himself he could get plenty to eat. Putting on a sheep skin to trick the shepherd, he joined the flock at grass without being discovered. At nightfall the shepherd shut him with the sheep in the ="trms">fold and made fast all round by blocking the entrance. Then, feeling hungry, he picked up his knife and s="trms">laughtered an ="trms">animal for his supper. It happened to be the wolf.
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a character that does not belong to one can involve one in ="trms">serious trouble
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">fable='lgc'>: (name of the) ='strcls'>*="trms">literary thing='strcls'>* that aime to ='strcls'>*teach ="trms">responsibility='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>='lgc'>--> self-understanding of the free subject (='lgc'><='lgc'>--="trms">fable='lgc'>--we are exposed to something in ="trms">language that troubles the possibility of that understanding)
="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%">
='lgc'>[in my ="trms">lecture performances with='lgc'>] ="trms">fable ='lgc'>[I aim to='lgc'>] offer an allegory-of un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading without limits and without guarantees ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> freedom
governmental concepts='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•subject
="lsts lst1">•="trms">agency
="lsts lst1">•will
="lsts lst1">•choice
="lsts lst1">•freedom
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--deconstruction='lgc'>='lgc'>--> limitation of ethico-political ="trms">responsibilities
for ="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>: ='strcls'>**="trms">question of ="trms">responsibility='lgc'> = ="trms">question of freedom='strcls'>**
the free ="trms">community of rational beings cannot simply be (regulatively) invoked
="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%">
calculable ='and'>& programmable law
="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: (names the predicament in which) ='strcls'>*coincide the necessity/inevitability of action ='and'>& the fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure of law='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•politics (and ethics) ='lgc'>--name='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the urgency and necessity of a ="trms">response
="lsts lst1">•="trms">responsibility (and freedom) ='lgc'>--name='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the impossibility of ="trms">response with guarantee
ethical ='lgc'>=/= actual
| |
impossibility ='lgc'>=/= totality of what [...]