[...]="trms">ontological paring of conceptual ="trms">language ='and'>& physical condition
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> meaning and concepts are drawn out of objects (not given to them)
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Haraway ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> companion ="trms">species='lgc'> = biologist ='lgc'>+ creatures
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Barad ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> concepts are ="trms">literally ="trms">embodied by the differing physical ="trms">apparatuses
="lsts lst1">•
="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
(we need more) art='lgc'>: careful accumulation of ="trms">skills
21st century ="trms">historiographic trends in art
artists increasingly ='strcls'>*deploy simulacra of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological practices and motifs='strcls'>* in their work
art practiced as ="trms">craft (but not all the time) ='lgc'>==allow='lgc'>='lgc'>==> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge grow from the insight of being in the ="trms">folding of life ='lgc'>[of infantile grandious fantasy, as well='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ="trms">anthropology
producing contemporary ruins to draw attention to ='strcls'>*the work of the ="trms">present in the production of the ="trms">past='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*artists take ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology as muse='strcls'>*
(through borrowing from ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology artists)
="lsts lst1">•create a kind of intellectual framing
="lsts lst1">•incorporate archival research
="lsts lst1">•themes of ="trms">memory and entropy
="lsts lst1">•="trms">question of absence
="lsts lst1">•
prosaic ="trms">nature of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological research
production of the finds
the way Dion distorts ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological work (allegorizing ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological practice) ='lgc'>--="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•consequence of sleight of hand
="lsts lst1">•he is dibbling at, performing being an ="trms"nttrm="search">archeologist
="lsts lst1">•‘play at’ ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology
='lgc'>=/= Simon Callery
="ppl">Alberti > Russell
transform ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology from ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor to allegory ='lgc'>--play='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology-as-="trms">aesthetics through performance ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> risk of undermining and reinforcing art as a subjective practice concerned with only ="trms">aesthetics and ="trms">affective='lgc'>]
="trms">craft='lgc'>: a model for careful practices and knowing the ="trms">world ='lgc'>=/= artwork='lgc'>: a model for how to break out of disciplinary frames and how to think of the ="trms">ontology of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological things ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what ="ppl">Sennett calls ="trms">epistemic breaking='lgc'>]
="trms">questions for the art='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•what effect is produced='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•how does this effect wrench from its ="trms">materiality what has not been perceived or sensed before='qstn'>?
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology same ="trms">question, from the ="trms">material that remain from the ="trms">past in the ="trms">present
(the traditional task of art='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•defamiliarization='lgc'>: to estrange our common consciousness and sensations of the ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•place of immanence='lgc'>: to project the coming of something ="trms">materially new that is latent in our current reality. to ='strcls'>*treat facts as events='strcls'>* that are about to come into being
="lsts lst1">•art is non-conceptual ='lgc'>: impacting the nervous ="trms">system without conceptual mediation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sensations are monumentalized in the artwork for the future
="lsts lst1">•
...to treat the ="trms">material of the ="trms">past as anticipating something new
(='mywrk'>my research and work on ="trms">bestiary='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•how can we produce new works that challenge us to think and experience ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological things (="nms">ajayeb) in new ways without re="trms">sort to explanation or ="trms">interpretation through a process of dis="trms">articulation, repurposing, and disruption of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological artworks with a political intent in mind='qstn'>? (="trms">interpretive framework)
="lsts lst1">•how to allow ="nms">ajayeb to continue to operate effectively on us='qstn'>?
both ="trms">affective and ="trms">historical force (of ="nms">ajayeb)
art engenders ="trms">material becomings (classical de="trms">finition)
art engenders ="trms">imaginative becomings
learning from ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology='lgc'>: to be pre-conceptual ='lgc'>: the process of ="trms">craft, to grasp how concepts make their way into things
undisciplinary space (instead of transdisciplinary)
dis="trms">articulation='lgc'>: repurposing and disruption of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological artworks with a political intent in mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cannot escape the anecdotal when it comes to ="trms">interpretation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> artifacts (='thdf'>for example a neolithic Balkon clay figurine) become ="trms">symbols for ="trms">social ="trms">position ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= allegorizing (='lgc'>=/= speculation)
="trms">historical energy (force) of things='lgc'> = something of the ="trms">past that endures in them
(old and unhelpful de="trms">finition of) art='lgc'>: impacting nervous ="trms">system without conceptual mediation (directly impact living bodies) ='lgc'>--engender='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">material becomings ='lgc'>["art='lgc'> = giving birth"='lgc'>]
='lgc'>--="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>='lgc'>--> art (and ="trms">anthropology) need the pre-conceptual='lgc'>: the process of ="trms">craft (to grasp how concepts make their way into things)
="large lg1" stl="font-size:137%">
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]concept='lgc'>: fragment of ="trms">past ="trms">world
maker ='lgc'>+ ="trms">material ='lgc'>==emerge='lgc'>='lgc'>==> concept
="prgrph">-in artistic research ='at'>@="nms">apass are we dealing with the simulacra of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='qstn'>?
understanding the potters (and artists) who made the ceramics as ="trms">crafters='lgc'> = understanding them as ='strcls'>*intimately connected with a particular ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of which came through ="trms">skilled ="trms">material practice
='at'>#feedback
="prgrph">-how does it apply to digital ="trms">relations='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•practiced caressing of hand over clay forms (='lgc'>~ handling, nurturance) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">zoo="trms">morphic, ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic bodies (Ingold call it ="trms">anthropogenic)
="lsts lst1">•digital ="trms">interface ="trms">CG ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•
="prgrph">-how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read or confront ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">bestiary artifacts and think of them as ='strcls'>*taking on something of the pre-conceptual labour that went into them='strcls'>*='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='qstn'>?how can it) provoke an art-like ="trms">response ='lgc'>[<='lgc'>=='lgc'>~ sleepwalking='lgc'>: no ="trms">ontological ="trms">difference between then and now ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> you are confronted with a raw ="trms">material of ="trms">affect and concept ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">past artifacts as vehicle for complex belief ="trms">systems='lgc'>] ='lgc'>}='lgc'>==drive='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•new sensorial experience
="lsts lst1">•new conceptual work
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to description, ="ppl">="ppl">Stewart
coalescing of ="trms">language ='and'>& concept ='and'>& ...
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]drawing='lgc'>: (the effect of being) harassed by reality
to be harassed by ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">past people ="trms">animals (struggling in their reality)
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to haunted, possession
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]art='lgc'>: risk of something new
="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intimate knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ="trms">materials (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appealing to art, ="trms">crafter attune to their ="trms">material)
my ="trms">lecture-performances='lgc'> = exploring how to make my knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">present (to myself so it has a chance to be reconsidered) and how things (="nms">ajayeb ="trms">past ="trms">bestiary telegram ="trms">animal) ="trms">affect me and to ='strcls'>*allow them to engender their own concepts and meanings='strcls'>*
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
(="trms">modern western) human='lgc'>: ="trms">composed of cultural clothing that hides and controls an essentially ="trms">animal ="trms">nature ='lgc'>=/= (amazonian) ="trms">animals have a human ="trms">sociocultural inner aspect that is “disguised” by an ostensibly bestial bodily form ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ ='lgc'>[subjective particularity of spirit and meaning ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>]='strcls'>*multi="trms">natural ='lgc'>=/= multicultural='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>== objective universality of body and substance='lgc'>] ='lgc'>}
="prgrph">-="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro's dichotomous argument leaves out other modes of knowing, those that i care and haunt for (and i am claimed by them) in ="trms">specific mystic muslim theology and eastern ="trms">bestiary (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Marks)
Amerindian “people” ='lgc'>: spiritual unity and a corporeal diversity
="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%">
possessing a soul ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> having a point of view ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> being a subject
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> event='lgc'> = action
(action ='lgc'>=/= expression of intentional states)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]object='lgc'>: incompletely ="trms">interpreted subject
“a muddy waterhole is seen by tapirs as a great ceremonial house”
="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%">
(objectivist ="trms">epistemology's) ‘to know'='lgc'> = to desubjectify, to make explicit the subject's partial ="trms">presence in the object ='lgc'>=/= (Amerindian shamanism ="trms">epistemology's) ‘to know'='lgc'> = to personify, something that is always a someone
="prgrph">-the problem is that only the shaman and some rogue artists know how to personify. i want to personify ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro!)
="prgrph">-his rendition of objectification is insufficient and not ="trms">specified (in which discipline by who and when how ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Barad)
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[in contemporary performance art='lgc'>: “becoming ="trms">animal” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a modality of ="trms">narcissistic ego-formation='lgc'>]
“perspectives should be kept separate. Only shamans, who are so to speak ="trms">species-androgynous, can make perspectives ="trms">communicate, and then only under special, controlled conditions.”
perspectivism='lgc'>: something is a fish only by virtue of someone else whose fish it is
(any) exchange='lgc'>: exchange of perspectives ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> 100 percent ="trms">relational universe ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> everything is primary fact (-then how would ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro explain deceive and lie='qstn'>? ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Kohn)
="large lg5" stl="font-size:117%">
multiculturalism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> relativism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> diversity of subjective and partial re="trms">presentations, each striving to grasp an external and unified ="trms">nature
(="trms">different ="trms">specificity of) bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> perspectives
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: dis="trms">positions or capacities that render the body of each ="trms">species unique ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]body='lgc'>: assemblage of ="trms">affects (ways of being) that constitute a habitus, bundle of ="trms">affects and capacities
='strcls'>**hum[...]