[...]g of something ="trms">materially new that is latent in our current reality. to ='strcls'>*treat facts as events='strcls'>* that are about to come into being
="lsts lst1">•art is non-conceptual ='lgc'>: impacting the nervous ="trms">system without conceptual mediation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sensations are monumentalized in the artwork for the future
="lsts lst1">•

...to treat the ="trms">material of the ="trms">past as anticipating something new

(='mywrk'>my research and work on ="trms">bestiary='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•how can we produce new works that challenge us to think and experience ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological things (="nms">ajayeb) in new ways without re="trms">sort to explanation or ="trms">interpretation through a process of dis="trms">articulation, repurposing, and disruption of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological artworks with a political intent in mind='qstn'>? (="trms">interpretive framework)
="lsts lst1">•how to allow ="nms">ajayeb to continue to operate effectively on us='qstn'>?

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> both ="trms">affective and ="trms">historical force (of ="nms">ajayeb)


art engenders ="trms">material becomings (classical de="trms">finition)
art engenders ="trms">imaginative becomings

learning from ="trms"nttrm="search">archeology='lgc'>: to be pre-conceptual ='lgc'>: the process of ="trms">craft, to grasp how concepts make their way into things


undisciplinary space (instead of transdisciplinary)

dis="trms">articulation='lgc'>: repurposing and disruption of ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological artworks with a political intent in mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cannot escape the anecdotal when it comes to ="trms">interpretation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> artifacts (='thdf'>for example a neolithic Balkon clay figurine) become ="trms">symbols for ="trms">social ="trms">position ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= allegorizing (='lgc'>=/= speculation)

="trms">historical energy (force) of things='lgc'> = something of the ="trms">past that endures in them


(old and unhelpful de="trms">finition of) art='lgc'>: impacting nervous ="trms">system without conceptual mediation (directly impact living bodies) ='lgc'>--engender='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">material becomings ='lgc'>["art='lgc'> = giving birth"='lgc'>]

='lgc'>--="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>='lgc'>--> art (and ="trms">anthropology) need the pre-conceptual='lgc'>: the process of ="trms">craft (to grasp how concepts make their way into things)


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]concept='lgc'>: fragment of ="trms">past ="trms">world

maker ='lgc'>+ ="trms">material ='lgc'>==emerge='lgc'>='lgc'>==> concept

="prgrph">-in artistic research ='at'>@="nms">apass are we dealing with the simulacra of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='qstn'>?


understanding the potters (and artists) who made the ceramics as ="trms">crafters='lgc'> = understanding them as ='strcls'>*intimately connected with a particular ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of which came through ="trms">skilled ="trms">material practice
='at'>#feedback
="prgrph">-how does it apply to digital ="trms">relations='qstn'>?

="lsts lst1">•practiced caressing of hand over clay forms (='lgc'>~ handling, nurturance) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">zoo="trms">morphic, ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic bodies (Ingold call it ="trms">anthropogenic)
="lsts lst1">•digital ="trms">interface ="trms">CG ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•


="prgrph">-how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read or confront ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">bestiary artifacts and think of them as ='strcls'>*taking on something of the pre-conceptual labour that went into them='strcls'>*='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='qstn'>?how can it) provoke an art-like ="trms">response ='lgc'>[<='lgc'>=='lgc'>~ sleepwalking='lgc'>: no ="trms">ontological ="trms">difference between then and now ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> you are confronted with a raw ="trms">material of ="trms">affect and concept ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">past artifacts as vehicle for complex belief ="trms">systems='lgc'>] ='lgc'>}='lgc'>==drive='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•new sensorial experience
="lsts lst1">•new conceptual work
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to description, ="ppl">="ppl">Stewart


coalescing of ="trms">language ='and'>& concept ='and'>& ...


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]drawing='lgc'>: (the effect of being) harassed by reality

to be harassed by ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">past people ="trms">animals (struggling in their reality)
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to haunted, possession

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]art='lgc'>: risk of something new

="trms"nttrm="search">archeology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intimate knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ="trms">materials (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appealing to art, ="trms">crafter attune to their ="trms">material)

my ="trms">lecture-performances='lgc'> = exploring how to make my knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">present (to myself so it has a chance to be reconsidered) and how things (="nms">ajayeb ="trms">past ="trms">bestiary telegram ="trms">animal) ="trms">affect me and to ='strcls'>*allow them to engender their own concepts and meanings='strcls'>*

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(="trms">modern western) human='lgc'>: ="trms">composed of cultural clothing that hides and controls an essentially ="trms">animal ="trms">nature ='lgc'>=/= (amazonian) ="trms">animals have a human ="trms">sociocultural inner aspect that is “disguised” by an ostensibly bestial bodily form ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ ='lgc'>[subjective particularity of spirit and meaning ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>]='strcls'>*multi="trms">natural ='lgc'>=/= multicultural='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>== objective universality of body and substance='lgc'>] ='lgc'>}

="prgrph">-="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro's dichotomous argument leaves out other modes of knowing, those that i care and haunt for (and i am claimed by them) in ="trms">specific mystic muslim theology and eastern ="trms">bestiary (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Marks)

Amerindian “people” ='lgc'>: spiritual unity and a corporeal diversity

possessing a soul ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> having a point of view ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> being a subject

='lgc'>='lgc'>==> event='lgc'> = action
(action ='lgc'>=/= expression of intentional states)

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]object='lgc'>: incompletely ="trms">interpreted subject

“a muddy waterhole is seen by tapirs as a great ceremonial house”

(objectivist ="trms">epistemology's) ‘to know'='lgc'> = to desubjectify, to make explicit the subject's partial ="trms">presence in the object ='lgc'>=/= (Amerindian shamanism ="trms">epistemology's) ‘to know'='lgc'> = to personify, something that is always a someone

="prgrph">-the problem is that only the shaman and some rogue artists know how to personify. i want to personify ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro!)
="prgrph">-his rendition of objectification is insufficient and not ="trms">specified (in which discipline by who and when how ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Barad)
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[in contemporary performance art='lgc'>: “becoming ="trms">animal” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a modality of ="trms">narcissistic ego-formation='lgc'>]

“perspectives should be kept separate. Only shamans, who are so to speak ="trms">species-androgynous, can make perspectives ="trms">communicate, and then only under special, controlled conditions.”

perspectivism='lgc'>: something is a fish only by virtue of someone else whose fish it is

(any) exchange='lgc'>: exchange of perspectives ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> 100 percent ="trms">relational universe ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> everything is primary fact (-then how would ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro explain deceive and lie='qstn'>? ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Kohn)

multiculturalism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> relativism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> diversity of subjective and partial re="trms">presentations, each striving to grasp an external and unified ="trms">nature

(="trms">different ="trms">specificity of) bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> perspectives

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: dis="trms">positions or capacities that render the body of each ="trms">species unique ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]body='lgc'>: assemblage of ="trms">affects (ways of being) that constitute a habitus, bundle of ="trms">affects and capacities

='strcls'>**humanity='lgc'>: a moral condition that ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes ="trms">animals='strcls'>**
human-="trms">animal has a physical continuity ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">natural ="trms">sciences='lgc'>] and a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical discontinuity ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>==> humanities='lgc'>]

(what would be a ='strcls'>*nonanimistic ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical continuity='strcls'>* between human-="trms">animal and other things='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we need ="trms">categorical mistakes and catachresis)

spirit/mind ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> distinguisher (of cultures, ="trms">species, etc.)
body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> connector (of ="trms">material beings)

(Amerindian) spirit/mind ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? reflexive form ='lgc'>=/= im="trms">material inner substance

the neo="trms">phenomenological appeal to the body as the site of subjective singularity
projects of “="trms">embodying” (the spirit) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eliminative ="trms">materialism

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> (culture='lgc'>: ="trms">modern name for Spirit)

="trms">integration ='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*="trms">inter="trms">specific ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis fact of ="trms">nature='strcls'>* that understands bodies as inherent transformabilities, bodies as the great ="trms">differentiators

="trms">integration ="trms">cosmology ='lgc'>--presume='lgc'>='lgc'>--> singular distinctiveness of minds ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> solipsism='lgc'>[= potentially absolute singularity of minds ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> fear that we will not recognize ourselves in our “own kind”; solipsism='lgc'>: ‘="trms">natural similarity of bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=> a real ="trms">community of spirit'='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--multiculturalism='lgc'>='lgc'>--> spiritual='lgc'>: the locus of ="trms">difference ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> theme of spiritual conversion
='lgc'>=/= bodily ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis

(a traditional problem in the West='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*how to connect and universalize='strcls'>*
individual substances are given, while ="trms">relations have to be made
='lgc'>=/=
(Amerindian problem, and problem of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*how to separate and particularize='strcls'>*
="trms">relations are given, while substances must be defined

="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%">
transformation ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">nature <='lgc'>=/= creation
="trms">transference ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> culture <='lgc'>=/= invention

='strcls'>*culture='lgc'> = acculturation='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*exchange='lgc'> = transformation of a ="trms">prior exchange event='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*to act='lgc'> = to ="trms">response='strcls'>*

="trms">poiesis (creation/production/invention model of action ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> objectification='lgc'>: ="trms">question of ‘documentation’ in art) ='lgc'>=/= praxis (transformation/exchange/transfer model of action ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> subjectification='lgc'>: ="trms">question of ‘what is/has changed='qstn'>?’)


="large lg5" stl="font-size:136%"> ="trms">story of “we had to steal fire from a divine father”
(god forbid the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of our abilities be ="trms">animal or queer)


mythology='lgc'>: a discourse on the given, the innate
myth='lgc'>: that which must be taken for granted


af="trms">finity and alliance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> exchange (amerindian)[...]