[...]s of knowing, those that i care and haunt for (and i am claimed by them) in ="trms">specific mystic muslim theology and eastern ="trms">bestiary (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Marks)
Amerindian “people” ='lgc'>: spiritual unity and a corporeal diversity
possessing a soul ='lgc'>==> having a point of view ='lgc'>==> being a subject
='lgc'>==> event='lgc'> = action
(action ='lgc'>=/= expression of intentional states)
="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]object='lgc'>: incompletely ="trms">interpreted subject
“a muddy waterhole is seen by tapirs as a great ceremonial house”
(objectivist ="trms">epistemology's) ‘to know'='lgc'> = to desubjectify, to make explicit the subject's partial ="trms">presence in the object ='lgc'>=/= (Amerindian shamanism ="trms">epistemology's) ‘to know'='lgc'> = to personify, something that is always a someone
="prgrph">-the problem is that only the shaman and some rogue artists know how to personify. i want to personify ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro!)
="prgrph">-his rendition of objectification is insufficient and not ="trms">specified (in which discipline by who and when how ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Barad)
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[in contemporary performance art='lgc'>: “becoming ="trms">animal” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a modality of ="trms">narcissistic ego-formation='lgc'>]
“perspectives should be kept separate. Only shamans, who are so to speak ="trms">species-androgynous, can make perspectives ="trms">communicate, and then only under special, controlled conditions.”
perspectivism='lgc'>: something is a fish only by virtue of someone else whose fish it is
(any) exchange='lgc'>: exchange of perspectives ='lgc'>==> 100 percent ="trms">relational universe ='lgc'>==> everything is primary fact (-then how would ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro explain deceive and lie='qstn'>? ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Kohn)
multiculturalism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> relativism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> diversity of subjective and partial re="trms">presentations, each striving to grasp an external and unified ="trms">nature
(="trms">different ="trms">specificity of) bodies ='lgc'>==> perspectives
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: dis="trms">positions or capacities that render the body of each ="trms">species unique ='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]body='lgc'>: assemblage of ="trms">affects (ways of being) that constitute a habitus, bundle of ="trms">affects and capacities
='strcls'>**humanity='lgc'>: a moral condition that ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes ="trms">animals='strcls'>**
human-="trms">animal has a physical continuity ='lgc'>[='lgc'>==> ="trms">natural ="trms">sciences='lgc'>] and a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical discontinuity ='lgc'>[='lgc'>==> humanities='lgc'>]
(what would be a ='strcls'>*nonanimistic ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical continuity='strcls'>* between human-="trms">animal and other things='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we need ="trms">categorical mistakes and catachresis)
spirit/mind ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> distinguisher (of cultures, ="trms">species, etc.)
body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> connector (of ="trms">material beings)
(Amerindian) spirit/mind ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? reflexive form ='lgc'>=/= im="trms">material inner substance
the neo="trms">phenomenological appeal to the body as the site of subjective singularity
projects of “="trms">embodying” (the spirit) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eliminative ="trms">materialism
(culture='lgc'>: ="trms">modern name for Spirit)
="trms">integration ='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*="trms">inter="trms">specific ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis fact of ="trms">nature='strcls'>* that understands bodies as inherent transformabilities, bodies as the great ="trms">differentiators
="trms">integration ="trms">cosmology ='lgc'>--presume='lgc'>='lgc'>--> singular distinctiveness of minds ='lgc'>==> solipsism='lgc'>[= potentially absolute singularity of minds ='lgc'>==> fear that we will not recognize ourselves in our “own kind”; solipsism='lgc'>: ‘="trms">natural similarity of bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=> a real ="trms">community of spirit'='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--multiculturalism='lgc'>='lgc'>--> spiritual='lgc'>: the locus of ="trms">difference ='lgc'>==> theme of spiritual conversion
='lgc'>=/= bodily ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis
(a traditional problem in the West='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*how to connect and universalize='strcls'>*
individual substances are given, while ="trms">relations have to be made
='lgc'>=/=
(Amerindian problem, and problem of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*how to separate and particularize='strcls'>*
="trms">relations are given, while substances must be defined
transformation ='lgc'>==> ="trms">nature <='lgc'>=/= creation
="trms">transference ='lgc'>==> culture <='lgc'>=/= invention
='strcls'>*culture='lgc'> = acculturation='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*exchange='lgc'> = transformation of a ="trms">prior exchange event='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*to act='lgc'> = to ="trms">response='strcls'>*
="trms">poiesis (creation/production/invention model of action ='lgc'>==> objectification='lgc'>: ="trms">question of ‘documentation’ in art) ='lgc'>=/= praxis (transformation/exchange/transfer model of action ='lgc'>==> subjectification='lgc'>: ="trms">question of ‘what is/has changed='qstn'>?’)
="trms">story of “we had to steal fire from a divine father”
(god forbid the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of our abilities be ="trms">animal or queer)
="large lg1" stl="font-size:131%">
mythology='lgc'>: a discourse on the given, the innate
myth='lgc'>: that which must be taken for granted
af="trms">finity and alliance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> exchange (amerindian)
parenthood ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> creation/production (="trms">modern western)
="prgrph">-the “exchange” (='lgc'>=/= “parenthood”) that ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro talks about fits seamlessly with capitalism's free exchange of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
warrior/shaman/artist ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conductors of perspectives
relative
="trms">relational
enmity='lgc'>: full-blown ="trms">social ="trms">relationship, extreme exchange
schema of ="trms">difference
(Amazonian ="trms">cosmology='lgc'>:) generic attributive pro="trms">position='lgc'> = cannibal pro="trms">position
='lgc'>==> self='lgc'>: gift of the other (='lgc'>=/= hylo="trms">morphism='lgc'>: an active usually ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively human subject confronts an inert and ="trms">naturalized object)
='strcls'>**="trms">cosmology (='lgc'>~ the hyphen between ="trms">nature and ="trms">society is ="trms">social) ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">naturalism (='lgc'>~ ="trms">relations between ="trms">society and ="trms">nature are ="trms">natural)='strcls'>**
we are body-objects in ="trms">ecological ="trms">interaction with other body-forces
="prgrph">-="trms">question for ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro='lgc'>: what would be then the “exchange” between Amerindian perspectivism and Western ="trms">naturalism='qstn'>? (not only that “we” should learn from Amerindian perspectivism but) what they can learn from us='qstn'>?
European ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: unextended thought and extended ="trms">matter (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Iron Man)
going from ="trms">questions of re="trms">presentation ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">questions of ="trms">ontology
simplification of ="trms">ontology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> objects pacified and silenced) ='lgc'>==> complication of ="trms">epistemology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> subjects proliferate and chatter) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “discursive practices” and “politics of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge” are results of that pacification='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
='strcls'>***someone must be wrong, something has to be explained='strcls'>*** (='lgc'><='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>-- we have never been ="trms">modern, they has ever been primitive)
(="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro)
formerly, savages mistook (their) re="trms">presentations for (our) reality; now, we mistake (our) re="trms">presentations for (other people's) reality. ="trms">rumor has it we have even be mistaking (our) re="trms">presentations for (our) reality when we “occidentalize”
="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%">
='strcls'>*culturalism, relativism, textualism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reduces reality to re="trms">presentation
='strcls'>*cognitivism, ="trms">sociobiology, evolutionary psychology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reduces re="trms">presentation to reality
it has been obvious (for more than seventy-five years) that at the heart of the ="trms">matter, there is no stuff; only form, only ="trms">relation
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
“="nms">ajayeb” a term i use in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively to examine a living and nonliving ‘="trms">historical site’ / ‘="trms">heritage web’ in order to learn/talk/speculate about what counts as ="trms">writing ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies ='lgc'>==> production of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges
(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's) bits of ="trms">past="trms">present, a tool for scale making
='lgc'>~(Weston's) time claims
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*="trms">past="trms">present='lgc'>: decline ="trms">epistemologically charged purifications that devout ="trms">complaints of “="trms">presentism” mandate='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-in ='mywrk'>my research (willing and required to become a beginner) i am asking='lgc'>: why ="trms">past and ="trms">present are so easy to separate='qstn'>?
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how our vision of ="trms">past and future creates our ="trms">present='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>==> directions, spinning dynamics,
in a sense ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb is a critique of “="trms">presentism"='lgc'>[= overvaluing ="trms">historically and culturally local constructions of the meaning and importance of a particular set of ="trms">stories and their conditions of production (of “ours”). (='thdf'>for example the “future” ="trms">story)='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? speculative ="trms">presentisms (Dinshaw's queer ="trms">historiography)
="large lg5" stl="font-size:140%">
='strcls'>*globalization='lgc'>: “that ="trms">travelogue of distributed, heterogeneous, linked, ="trms">socio="trms">technical circulations that ="trms">craft the ="trms">world as a net called the global” (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway)
='lgc'>='lgc'>~= processes ="trms">responsible for the power and mobility of media, money, politics, sexualities, and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> these meanings and powers can be “glocalized”='lgc'>: altered, filled in, indigenized, and reunderstood ='strcls'>*within local ="trms">agencies='strcls'>*(='lgc'>: people, art forms, practices of everyday life)
(globalization processes) ='lgc'>==> academically uncomfortable and sometimes politically reprehensible سزاوار سرزنش forms of hybrid ="trms">histories
(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's flexible knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>:) layers of locals and globals
my aim in ='mywrk'>my research is creating ='strcls'>*struggle for understanding='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= many ="trms">communities involved in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, ="trms">writing, ="trms">interpreting,='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***we are all ="trms">members in these ="trms">communities struggling for understanding='strcls'>***
Urton paying attention to decompiling ="trms">intermediaty ="trms">positions between so-cal[...]