[...]m="trms">material inner substance

the neo="trms">phenomenological appeal to the body as the site of subjective singularity
projects of “="trms">embodying” (the spirit) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eliminative ="trms">materialism

(culture='lgc'>: ="trms">modern name for Spirit)

="trms">integration ='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*="trms">inter="trms">specific ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis fact of ="trms">nature='strcls'>* that understands bodies as inherent transformabilities, bodies as the great ="trms">differentiators

="trms">integration ="trms">cosmology ='lgc'>--presume='lgc'>='lgc'>--> singular distinctiveness of minds ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> solipsism='lgc'>[= potentially absolute singularity of minds ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> fear that we will not recognize ourselves in our “own kind”; solipsism='lgc'>: ‘="trms">natural similarity of bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=> a real ="trms">community of spirit'='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--multiculturalism='lgc'>='lgc'>--> spiritual='lgc'>: the locus of ="trms">difference ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> theme of spiritual conversion
='lgc'>=/= bodily ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis

(a traditional problem in the West='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*how to connect and universalize='strcls'>*
individual substances are given, while ="trms">relations have to be made
='lgc'>=/=
(Amerindian problem, and problem of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*how to separate and particularize='strcls'>*
="trms">relations are given, while substances must be defined

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%">
transformation ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">nature <='lgc'>=/= creation
="trms">transference ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> culture <='lgc'>=/= invention

='strcls'>*culture='lgc'> = acculturation='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*exchange='lgc'> = transformation of a ="trms">prior exchange event='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*to act='lgc'> = to ="trms">response='strcls'>*

="trms">poiesis (creation/production/invention model of action ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> objectification='lgc'>: ="trms">question of ‘documentation’ in art) ='lgc'>=/= praxis (transformation/exchange/transfer model of action ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> subjectification='lgc'>: ="trms">question of ‘what is/has changed='qstn'>?’)


="trms">story of “we had to steal fire from a divine father”
(god forbid the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of our abilities be ="trms">animal or queer)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:139%">
mythology='lgc'>: a discourse on the given, the innate
myth='lgc'>: that which must be taken for granted


af="trms">finity and alliance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> exchange (amerindian)
parenthood ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> creation/production (="trms">modern western)
="prgrph">-the “exchange” (='lgc'>=/= “parenthood”) that ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro talks about fits seamlessly with capitalism's free exchange of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

warrior/shaman/artist ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conductors of perspectives


relative
="trms">relational

enmity='lgc'>: full-blown ="trms">social ="trms">relationship, extreme exchange

schema of ="trms">difference

(Amazonian ="trms">cosmology='lgc'>:) generic attributive pro="trms">position='lgc'> = cannibal pro="trms">position
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> self='lgc'>: gift of the other (='lgc'>=/= hylo="trms">morphism='lgc'>: an active usually ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively human subject confronts an inert and ="trms">naturalized object)

='strcls'>**="trms">cosmology (='lgc'>~ the hyphen between ="trms">nature and ="trms">society is ="trms">social) ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">naturalism (='lgc'>~ ="trms">relations between ="trms">society and ="trms">nature are ="trms">natural)='strcls'>**

we are body-objects in ="trms">ecological ="trms">interaction with other body-forces

="prgrph">-="trms">question for ="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro='lgc'>: what would be then the “exchange” between Amerindian perspectivism and Western ="trms">naturalism='qstn'>? (not only that “we” should learn from Amerindian perspectivism but) what they can learn from us='qstn'>?

European ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: unextended thought and extended ="trms">matter (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Iron Man)
going from ="trms">questions of re="trms">presentation ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">questions of ="trms">ontology
simplification of ="trms">ontology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> objects pacified and silenced) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> complication of ="trms">epistemology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> subjects proliferate and chatter) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “discursive practices” and “politics of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge” are results of that pacification='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

='strcls'>***someone must be wrong, something has to be explained='strcls'>*** (='lgc'><='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>-- we have never been ="trms">modern, they has ever been primitive)

(="ppl">Viveiros ="ppl">de Castro)
formerly, savages mistook (their) re="trms">presentations for (our) reality; now, we mistake (our) re="trms">presentations for (other people's) reality. ="trms">rumor has it we have even be mistaking (our) re="trms">presentations for (our) reality when we “occidentalize”


='strcls'>*culturalism, relativism, textualism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reduces reality to re="trms">presentation
='strcls'>*cognitivism, ="trms">sociobiology, evolutionary psychology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reduces re="trms">presentation to reality

it has been obvious (for more than seventy-five years) that at the heart of the ="trms">matter, there is no stuff; only form, only ="trms">relation

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

“="nms">ajayeb” a term i use in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively to examine a living and nonliving ‘="trms">historical site’ / ‘="trms">heritage web’ in order to learn/talk/speculate about what counts as ="trms">writing ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> production of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges

(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's) bits of ="trms">past="trms">present, a tool for scale making
='lgc'>~(Weston's) time claims
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*="trms">past="trms">present='lgc'>: decline ="trms">epistemologically charged purifications that devout ="trms">complaints of “="trms">presentism” mandate='lgc'>]

="prgrph">-in ='mywrk'>my research (willing and required to become a beginner) i am asking='lgc'>: why ="trms">past and ="trms">present are so easy to separate='qstn'>?
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how our vision of ="trms">past and future creates our ="trms">present='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> directions, spinning dynamics,

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> in a sense ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb is a critique of “="trms">presentism"='lgc'>[= overvaluing ="trms">historically and culturally local constructions of the meaning and importance of a particular set of ="trms">stories and their conditions of production (of “ours”). (='thdf'>for example the “future” ="trms">story)='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? speculative ="trms">presentisms (Dinshaw's queer ="trms">historiography)

='strcls'>*globalization='lgc'>: “that ="trms">travelogue of distributed, heterogeneous, linked, ="trms">socio="trms">technical circulations that ="trms">craft the ="trms">world as a net called the global” (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway)
='lgc'>='lgc'>~= processes ="trms">responsible for the power and mobility of media, money, politics, sexualities, and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> these meanings and powers can be “glocalized”='lgc'>: altered, filled in, indigenized, and reunderstood ='strcls'>*within local ="trms">agencies='strcls'>*(='lgc'>: people, art forms, practices of everyday life)
(globalization processes) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> academically uncomfortable and sometimes politically reprehensible سزاوار سرزنش forms of hybrid ="trms">histories

(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's flexible knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>:) layers of locals and globals

my aim in ='mywrk'>my research is creating ='strcls'>*struggle for understanding='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= many ="trms">communities involved in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, ="trms">writing, ="trms">interpreting,='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***we are all ="trms">members in these ="trms">communities struggling for understanding='strcls'>***

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> Urton paying attention to decompiling ="trms">intermediaty ="trms">positions between so-calles ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and ="trms">writing ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> string records ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> numerical accounts or maps or... ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">histories and ="trms">narratives

='mywrk'>my research on ="nms">ajayeb in ="nms">apass as a practice is about ='strcls'>*disassembling and reordering classifications we use to access ="trms">pasts='strcls'>*


the excursion i did in Vladmir's block was somehow about examining sites of implicitly or explicitly knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge production in commercialized forms
museum, TV documentry as a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor ='lgc'>{a richly contaminated set of ="trms">crafty ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors and realities='lgc'>} and ="trms">narrative frame, a momentary melding of ="trms">past="trms">presents in ="trms">imaginative reenactment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economic globalization figuring in artistic/academic capitalism
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">ajayeb is also of this kind,) ='strcls'>*site of ="trms">heritage='strcls'>* culture as promoting particular versions of ="trms">history, nation, ="trms">science, art, and ="trms">religion='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the excursion made me) with ="nms">ajayeb to be careful with ‘the commerce with global knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge production’ ='lgc'>--(what is at stake)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structure of ="trms">pasts, peoples, and sensation
='strcls'>*="trms">heritage culture ='lgc'>==(impress)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> public ="trms">histories='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appropriation of national and personal identities; today (specially in university) no one is “immune from governing pressures of ="trms">heritage culture or the impression of corporate management assumptions, styles, funding requirements, and money-making imperatives in enterprise culture” (="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King > Morley ='and'>& ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Robin,Robot,Robert,Robocop">Robins) ='lgc'>[i can ="trms">imagine ="nms">apass is struggling with this specially in Brussels='lgc'>]
(='at'>@Vera's ="trms">position as a museum tour guide, exploitations of the ="trms">interpreter/reenactors, who are promised semiprofessional recognition within ="trms">social ="trms">historical practice but instead end up as engineers of a “feel good” atmosphere for tourism)
(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King > S="trms">laughter ='and'>& Leslie) ='strcls'>*global ="trms">market='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•fields “close to the ="trms">market” ='lgc'>--(reguire)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> proucts
="lsts lst1">•fields “peripheral to the ="trms">market” ='lgc'>--(are pushed to)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pedagogy and public service
(sometimes virtually indistinguishable='lgc'>:) impulse to democratize ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? commodify knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-they model for museum goers as='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦reenactors
="lsts lst2">◦shadows
="lsts lst2">◦witnesses
="lsts lst2">◦a play at being “there”='lgc'>:
="lsts lst3">◾on set
="lsts lst3">◾on site
="lsts lst3">◾in that ="trms">past
="lsts lst3">◾in a ="trms">past='lgc'>:
="lsts lst4">◽mentally enacting
="lsts lst4">◽reenacting
="lsts lst4">◽experimenting
="lsts lst4">◽speculating
="lsts lst4">◽trying to find evidence for various ="trms">past="trms">presents


="large lg5" stl="font-size:123%"> TV camera='lgc'>: like a ="trms">historical source, arbitrarily selects what it chooses to show, never lies and never understands (Kopkins)

TV documentry's “distributed ="trms">agencies”='lgc'>: neither ='lgc'>[director and screen[...]