[...] of ="trms">poetry, ="trms">poem's body of sound is its ="trms">specific particular flesh, sonic texture ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**making the ="trms">language more markedly like the ="trms">world='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[a trail, pathway through a wood of sounds, an unmistakably ="trms">specific landscape, loyal to the local='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]synesthesia='lgc'>: occasion of ex="trms">citement, a skein of complicated perception, (="trms">sort of a ="trms">literary ="trms">technique,) something like a snapshot of the image-making mind at work ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> superim="trms">position of both events and of senses (and of s="trms">cenes='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a consciousness
(aim of many artists='lgc'>:) “to form the sensorium, the sphere of perception in which we dwell” ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">Doty sug="trms">gests='lgc'>:) it is work to ="trms">sort them out (what ="trms">sorts out senses='qstn'>? ="trms">question ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda, she must learn='lgc'>: an accurate rendering of an idio="trms">syncratic process of sensory overlap and as="trms">sociation)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]لحن tone='lgc'>: special effects, evoking a ‘moment of’ ... intense statement of feeling ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a concretely descriptive feeling
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">questions are always a little more trustworty than answers (='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>-- sometimes things said do not take the ='strcls'>*="trms">rhetorical form of a ="trms">question='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in ="nms">apass i was training to be able to capture those kind of ummarkedly ="trms">questions='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> something said (described) with room for indeterminacy ///='strcls'>*convex mirror='strcls'>* (="ppl">Doty's refractive thinking)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]فعل ="trms">verb, the descriptive force of the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right (hardworking) ="trms">verb, a kind of muscular concreteness. sometimes ="trms">verbs gain descriptive force when other parts of speech are newly cast in active roles
='strcls'>*invocation='lgc'> = directly addressing the thing creates a sense of immediacy and of connection
='strcls'>*thou, with its sug="trms">gestion of divinity or be="trms">loved ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> prayer
='strcls'>*hectic='lgc'>: uncomfortable alliance, inharmonious, something that might set the teeth on ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
='strcls'>*destroy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a death-steeped perception that ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads the wind as a “destroyer”
='strcls'>*="trms">world of fused duality
‘and’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the sig="trms">nature element of a place, of a landscape, the conjoined body ='lgc'>: the animate and the inorganic as one thing
="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
='strcls'>*the project of being alive='strcls'>* (is little understood)
(='lgc'>[my project is perhaps='lgc'>] to become) a person whom the ancient ="trms">world is remarkably vivid='strcls'>*** ='heart'>♥
to have gossiped about figures of ancient Persia
to believe that the ='strcls'>*="trms">world is queer='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= Mobed, ="frds scrmbld">Foad, Reza)
(we need ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) a window of doupt through which all creative possbility comes into being
(Forster='lgc'>:) “='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] standing absolutly motionless at a sight angle to the universe”
(queer ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?) an oblique مورب ="trms">position in ="trms">relation to the real (='lgc'>=/= buisiness as usual)
queer to be ="trms">interested in what can't be packaged or sold in the ="trms">marketplace
queer to enjoy the fundamentally useless, contemplative pleasure of (="trms">poetry, ="nms">ajayeb, etc.)
description ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*providing the particular evidence of ="trms">specificity='strcls'>*
not everything can/need to be described ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**the choice of what to evoke='strcls'>**, to make any s="trms">cene seem ‘real’ vagheyi. look at USA film industry and all the efforts put in scenic description of the WWII, vampire ="trms">stories, teenage life, nation; or in ="nms">iran in ="nms">Iran-Iraq war (="acrnms">="nms">Iranq)
lush, ="trms">sensuous, flowering
parallel text to the creature
“you are gorgeous and i am coming” ='heart'>♥
an approximation, unstoppable as an approachoig sound of approaching organism
testing and smelling
insight and sound ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Lili
an aphrodisiac and a chastening reminder='lgc'>: getting sidetracked by grief
“my portion this time”
='strcls'>*art is a house that tries to be haunted='strcls'>* ='heart'>♥ (="ppl">Doty > Dickinson)
قافیه به تنگ آمد ghafie tang, (when a choice is) driven more by sonic than by logic
what kind of game is the sea='qstn'>? ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Marialena
lap and drag. crag and gleam
(monosyllables ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> are we ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading nouns or ="trms">verbs='qstn'>? tough, playful ocean)
syntactical ambiguity disorients
(Khayam's) desire to die into the ="trms">world (='lgc'>~ to surrender into the life of things)
='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*describer's art='strcls'>*
autumn
a kind of logarithn of decay and rekindling
to describe description
a work of advocacy
to go description-hunting in ="nms">ajayeb
evocation of sense perception (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">technique that Adventure Times TV series uses)
="large lg10" stl="font-size:112%">
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg14" stl="font-size:104%">
="ppl">="ppl">Foucault ='lgc'>[_="trms">bestiary of the ="trms">imagination='lgc'>]
...precisely because it puts them into ="trms">categories of their own, the Chinese encyclopedia localizes their ='lgc'>[fantastic entities, ="trms">fabulous ="trms">animals, poly="trms">morphous and demoniacal faces, creatures breathing fire,,='lgc'>] powers of contagion
encyclopedia ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> quality of ="trms">monstrosity does not ="trms">affect any real body (='lgc'>=/= ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurk)
="large lg1" stl="font-size:122%">
="trms">animals in the non-place of ="trms">language, meeting in the im="trms">material sound of the voice pronouncing their enumeration
“Absurdity destroys the ‘and’ of the enumeration by making impossible the ‘in’ where the things enumerated would be divided up.”
the ‘operating table’
a table ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a tabula, “that enables thought to operate upon the entities of our ="trms">world, to put them in order, to divide them into classes, to group them ="trms">according to names that designate their similarities and their ="trms">differences='lgc'>--the table upon which, since the beginning of time, ="trms">language has ="trms">intersected space.” (="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, The Order of Things)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='strcls'>*="trms">questionable ="trms">interpretations
='at'>#attention
(='lgc'>[art/='lgc'>]="trms">aesthetics of noticing)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appreciation of multi="trms">species landscape, making living ="trms">ecologies
which sectors/fields of art require artist to go out and notice things='qstn'>?
(engage with which) details of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> breaking common sense
our mamalian bias='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•predetermined body shape and size
="lsts lst1">•run toward death (pre-programmed death ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">history) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> makes us think in terms of set-life courses
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> allow us to ="trms">imagine a standard individual outside of ="trms">history
(="ppl">Tsing's) ="trms">history='lgc'>: overlapping tracks and traces and many ="trms">trajectories of ="trms">world-making, human and not human
irreversible time ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> indeterminacy (of ="trms">history) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new alliances ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ability of assemblages to produce ="trms">historical changes in our common ="trms">world
what needs to be stated
what needs to be produced
context-dependent ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way things are
architecture of podium ='lgc'><='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> labor-process of the actual speaker
how talks are ='strcls'>*actually='strcls'>* produced
in your ="trms">material practices
hybrid in digital manual tactile operations of speaking
noticing ants, spiders, little ="trms">traps, ="trms">species cohabiting, ="trms">mutual coproduction of economics, ="trms">ecology, labor-studies, house-hold studies, ="nms">ajayeb-studies, and understanding of the orders of the ="trms">natural and human ="trms">world
(Gordon allowing) ='strcls'>*algorithms to become ="trms">stories='strcls'>*
(the ="trms">technological enablement of some) ='strcls'>*disciplines of attention='strcls'>*
“we are al lichen”='lgc'>: we are all eco="trms">system com="trms">posite critters
ants, combining two kinds of noise, half-hazard patterns of ="trms">interaction
half-hazard contact
half-hazard context
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> it works (='lgc'>=/= perfection, precision/efficiency of clockwork)
='at'>#some ="ppl">="ppl">Baradian models of ="trms">intra-action in popular cinema='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">intra-action received and wielded through discipleship and pre-programmed talent='lgc'>:) The Force in ="ppl">="ppl">Starwars. ='lgc'>[the ="trms">story don't allow any other ="trms">story of The Force and its ="trms">contingencies other that good and evil tool-use of it='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">intra-action resisted by individual subjectification='lgc'>:) the shadowy ="trms">monster from the Upside Down in The Str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger Things, possessing the character. ='lgc'>[the ="trms">story is based on non-="trms">intra-active models and mode of being in the ="trms">world of multi="trms">species in multi-dimensions, it wants clear boundried subjects encapsulated by psychological ego and self-possession persons, ideas of identity and power ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> life insurance ="trms">system='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">intra-action resisted by the political ="trms">modern concrete individualism='lgc'>:) ="trms">relationship with the phantom of state in The Handmaid's Tale. ='lgc'>[overlapping a flat image of totalitarian ="trms">society into ="trms">religion='lgc'>]
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="trms">technosphere='lgc'>: (conceptualized as) an unintended muddle of multi="trms">species ="trms">relationships emerging from contaminated landscapes, dumps
='lgc'>--reconsider-with='lgc'>-> feral ="trms">technologies='lgc'>: novel and weedy capacities for ="trms">materially significant change
invasive artificial intelligence
="trms">anthropo="trms">cene='lgc'>: a multidimensional puzzle structured around complexities and ruptures ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when ways of being ='and'>& ways of belonging can no longer be studied ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively
(human-nonhuman-machine)
="lsts lst1">•who orders the ="trms">technosphere='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•who inhabits the ="trms">technosphere='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
“unmediated experience” ='lgc'>--(signals a d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> naive realism (='lgc'>+ its polar op="trms">posite='lgc'>: naive subjectivism)
soup operatic
operatic (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> opera)
aporetic (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> aporia)
operative (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> secret ="trms">agent)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
‘learning’ in biology='lgc'>: (how to overcome X that) its ="trms">ancestors would have not met
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">stories of ‘trial-and-error’ in ="trms">animals
='thdf'>the idea of having ‘varying ="trms">technique’ (closer to human) in regard to biological stasis
how ='thdf'>the idea of ‘intelligence’ in ="trms">animals is construted ="trms">according to venture capitalism predatory preferences
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
mileu ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> part of the ="trms">history of ='thdf'>the idea of ="trms">animal
the living being and its environment, ="ppl">Canguilhem
='lgc'>[mileu='lgc'>: in French “middle,” in the midst of, medium, between, ... set, circle='lgc'>]
(='thdf'>the notion of) ='strcls'>*environment='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[relentlessly universal and required='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--for='lgc'>='lgc'>--> capturing both the experience and existence of living beings
="ppl">Canguilhem going through the ="trms">historical ="trms">stages of the formation of the concept of milieu/environment
="prgrph">-imported into biology in the second half of 18th century from (mechanocal notion) ="ppl">Newton by Lamarck
="prgrph">-later they ='lgc'>[1870s Giard, Le Dantec, Houssay, Roule, etc.='lgc'>] take the idea from Lamarck, but they get the word, as an abstract universal term, from Taine
18th century French mechanics ‘milieu’ what ="ppl">Newton understood by ‘fluid’
problem of mechanics='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">Newtonian='lgc'>:) problem of mechanics='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*action at a distance of distinct physical individuals ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*ether='strcls'>*='lgc'>: fluid medium of action at a distance ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> moon, lunar='lgc'>], continous in air
physics of central forces ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “environment='lgc'>: a between two centers”
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">Descartes='lgc'>:) collision='lgc'>: the only mode of physical action (‘environment’ has no place in ="ppl">Cartesian physics)
='strcls'>*individuals occupying distinct points in space='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they cannot act without joing their action ='lgc'>[”='qstn'>?!” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> i am very conscious (and suspicious) about that which i feel that i don't understand ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what kind of nununderstander is at work here='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="ppl">Newton imported “milieu” into biology
action of an environment
='lgc'>[="trms">material racism ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>?='lgc'>] (a fluid) strictly defined by its physical properties
="lsts lst1">•(Lamarck ='lgc'>[taking from ="ppl">Newton the ='strcls'>*physico-mathematical model of explanation='strcls'>*='lgc'>]='lgc'>:) environment/milieu='lgc'>: set of actions exerted on the living being from outside, “influencing circumstances”
physico-mathematical model of explanation (of living/dead beings) ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? psycho-="trms">material model of explanation
(what would Machiavelli think of mileu='qstn'>?)
="trms">animal ethology, habits of ="trms">animals describable as distinctive and ="trms">specific characteristics
="trms">epistemology='lgc'>: ='strcls'>**="trms">historical psychology of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>**
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">historicity='lgc'>: should the fact that two or several leading ideas are combined at a given moment in a single theory be ="trms">interpreted as the sign that (although they may seem to be quite ="trms">different when subject of analysis) they ultimately have a common o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin whose meaning and often even existence are forgotten when they are considered separately='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Canguilhem beautifully brings the ="trms">question of ="trms">epistemology into his terms)
the ='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==commands='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the ='strcls'>*meaning='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==commands='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the ='strcls'>*use='strcls'>*
Comte's general biological theory of the environment
Comte employing a neologism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the fluid in which a body is immersed” (='lgc'>--confirming='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the mechanical o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of the notion,) “the total set of external circumstances necessary for the existence of every organism” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">="ppl">Barad's ="trms">intra-active model of explanation='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (="trms">rhetoric of) ='strcls'>*dialectical conception of the ="trms">relations between the organism and the environment='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--instances such as “suited/adapted organism” and “favorable environment” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? affordance theory='lgc'>]
Comte seeking a guarantee of his dialectical connection in the ="ppl">Newtonian principal of action and reaction='lgc'>:
organism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> variable
environment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> function
theory of the environment in Comte='lgc'>: (strictly mechanistic meaning of the word...) ="trms">world ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> man
Comte ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Lamarck='lgc'>: “milieu='lgc'> = circumstances='lgc'> = surrounding environment” ='lgc'>==sug="trms">gest='lgc'>='lgc'>==> intuition of a ='strcls'>*centered or focused formation='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> circle, sphere
='strcls'>***circumstances and surroundings still preserve a ="trms">symbolic value, but milieu forgoes reference to any other ="trms">relation other than that of a ="trms">position forever denied by exteriority ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
چو پرگار میشدم...
چو نقطه...
گرد...
now refers to befor, here to its beyond, and so on without cease='strcls'>***
(in ="nms">iranian ="trms">poetry) environment='lgc'>: a pure ="trms">system of ="trms">relations without supports
='strcls'>*='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> environment='lgc'>: a universal ="trms">instrument for dissolving ='strcls'>*individualized organic synthesis='strcls'>* in the anonymity of universal elements and movements
(='thdf'>for example) ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metamerism of fish='lgc'>: “fish do not lead their lives themselves, the river has made them lead it, they are ='strcls'>*persons without personality='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>== strictly mechanistic use of ='thdf'>the notion of environment ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Descartes ="trms">beast machine='lgc'>])
Lamarck='lgc'>: the environment dominates and control the evolution of living beings through the ="trms">intermediary of ='strcls'>*need='strcls'>*(= a subjective notion entailing reference to a ="trms">positive pole of vital values)
(for Lamarck='lgc'>:) life and environment (which is unaware of it ='lgc'>~(Lamarckian ='strcls'>*vitalism='strcls'>*='lgc'>:) ‘there is an o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginality of life of which the environment takes no account’) are two series of a="trms">synchronous events ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]adaptation='lgc'>: life's renewed effort to “stick” to an in="trms">different environment
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]being='lgc'>: the effect of an effort ='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> striving='lgc'>]
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this a="trms">synchronicity ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “us” and “place”)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> environment does nothing for life ='lgc'>--Bichat='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “life='lgc'>: set of functions that resist death” (='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>-> tales of survival in America sci-fi TV series)
life resists solely by changing its shape in order to survive
="ppl">Darwin explaining the ‘appearance of new forms’ conjunction of two mechanisms='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- mechanism of the production of ="trms">differences ='lgc'>~ variation
="lstsrd">2- mechanism of the reduction and criticism of these produced ="trms">differences ='lgc'>~ vital competition and ="trms">natural selection
(for ="ppl">Darwin the fundamental biological ="trms">relationship='lgc'>:) the ="trms">relationship of the living being to other living beings ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> precedence over environment conceived as a set of physical forces
="prgrph">-competition of forces
="prgrph">-accidental ="trms">morphological variation
(for ="ppl">Darwin='lgc'>:) ‘to live'='lgc'> = to submit an individual ="trms">difference to the judgment of the set of living beings ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ='strcls'>*die or be part of the jury='strcls'>*
="trms">monstrosity='lgc'>: the rule
o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginality='lgc'>: provisional ordinariness
="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%">
finalism ='lgc'>--="ppl">Darwin='lgc'>='lgc'>--> selection
='strcls'>***both Lamarck and ="ppl">Darwin denounce finalism and celebrate mechanism
(both, ='lgc'>[complementary='lgc'>] biologists to whom) life appears as a datum which they seek to describe without being too concerned about accounting for it analytically ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> not accouting for the analyticallity of their objects='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
Lamarck ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (thinks of life in terms of) ='strcls'>*duration='strcls'>*
="ppl">Darwin ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (thinks of life in terms of) ='strcls'>*="trms">interdependence='strcls'>*
="ppl">Darwin's biogeographical environment ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? Lamarck's environment
="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%">
="ppl">Humboldt (and Ritter) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (19th century) geography='lgc'>: a ="trms">science conscious of its ="trms">method and its dignity
(="trms">natura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ="trms">traveler ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='strcls'>*="ppl">Humboldt's “Kosmos” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ synthesis of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, not aiming to be encyclopedic, but strives ='strcls'>***to arrive at an intuition of the universe='strcls'>***='lgc'>] combining='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•(“oikoumene” tradition of ="trms">Greek geography='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*the ="trms">science of the entire human ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•(“mathematical geography” founded by Eratosthenes, Hipparchus, Ptolemy='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*the ="trms">science of coordination of human space in ="trms">relation with the celectial con="trms">figuration and movements='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Olearius='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> Earth ='lgc'>[considered as a whole='lgc'>]='lgc'>: (stable support for the) ='strcls'>*فراز و نشيب vicis="trms">situde of ="trms">history='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘terrestrial space ='lgc'>+ its con="trms">figurations’ ='lgc'>: object of geographical, geological, ="trms">sociological, biological knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
(="ppl">Humboldt) applied a whole ="trms">system of barometric, thermometric in his investigation. ='strcls'>*division of plants='strcls'>* ="trms">according to ="trms">different climates ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “botanical geography” ='and'>& “="trms">zoological geography”
="trms">history of the Weltanschauung
='strcls'>*****how ="ppl">Humboldt (and Ritter, ='lgc'>[even ="ppl">Simondon does that too='lgc'>]) apply the ='strcls'>*="trms">category of totality='strcls'>* to their object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">relations between ="trms">historical man and the environment ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*determination of ="trms">historical ="trms">relationships='strcls'>*
the ="trms">relations between the geographical environment and man ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a s[...]