[...]nology itself answers the call='lgc'>--(="ppl">Avital)='lgc'>]) could we work with Ophelia's kind of ='at'>#Wortsalad instead='qstn'>? (Salad-e Kalame, khoresht-e kalame; same thing happens to Shirin of in Khosro Shirin, but unlike ="ppl">Shakespeare, ="ppl">Nezami allows another ="trms">poetic drift;) ="ppl">Heidegger's “die Sprache spricht” ='lgc'>: ="trms">language is monologue ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">schizophrenia and ="trms">schizophrenic discourse ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structure of speaking='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[speaking asserts a certain temporal ="trms">priority which we must undermine='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening ='strcls'>*before='strcls'>* speaking
="prgrph">-“We hear ="trms">language speaking” (="ppl">Heidegger); a non-organic speaking; ="trms">language is not ="trms">="trms">equipped with organs of speech='qstn'>? (="ppl">Avital)


="trms">serious ="trms">joking / ="trms">joking ="trms">seriousness ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>]
="trms">joke/="trms">jest/="trms">gesture
a space of play ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where ideas come in to being
(="trms">story of ‘or’. is it where the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">joker came='qstn'>? using or instead of and)
(there is no ‘or’ in ="trms">nature!='qstn'>? what are the earlier forms of or that we can trace in cave paintings or tool makings='qstn'>?)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> ='strcls'>**if you don't take my idea ="trms">seriously i will be utterly incomprehensible='strcls'>**

="trms">crafts-person for the building of ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures of pro="trms">positions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘abstractions’
(abstraction is fragile and can hold ="trms">worlds together)


where Europe comes from='qstn'>? (woher kommst du='qstn'>? i am born in, i am born in, ...)


what animates us rather than what civilizes us



(to ="frds scrmbld">Shabnam='lgc'>:) to ‘mourn with’ rather than ‘mourn about’
(-about ='lgc'>=/= -with)
(structure of mourning)


to break in the philosophical and biological headquarters (and steal their ="trms">stories, their abstractions, etc.)
exchanging and sharing ="trms">instruments and ="trms">languages



this is about building something that is ‘good enough’ to get you through...

these practices doesn't necessarily produce ‘separate entities’ (indivis)
am i fantasizing creating a monolithic structure of ideas='qstn'>?


critique is an art that tangles with what you are proposing
(like an octopus in a ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="trms">stories that can ="trms">interrupt death (of our time, ="trms">anthropo="trms">cene, etc.)
(='thdf'>example of biology-="trms">story into culture-="trms">story='lgc'>: (1) ladder of evolution ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> progress (2) sperm/egg ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> gender performance)

to change ="trms">stories so that they are more livable
we live ="trms">stories

to make mistakes as fast as possible


... move across earth space and ="trms">narrative space


="trms">situated ="trms">stories
they can't tell everything, but what is needed here


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugium_(population_biology)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="trms">ontological choreography
vital ="trms">sort of play that the participants invent out of a ="trms">history of body and mind they in="trms">herit

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

possible performances
='strcls'>*two doors, ='qstn'>?, talk, model, puppet
='strcls'>*using stop-motion animation, clay formation, ="trms">material ="trms">animal facial properties

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

seeing a car crashing, is seeing a ="trms">causation, seeing a reasoning, is that logos='qstn'>? is it logos when we see a physical experimentation='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>]

the established (dis)order is NOT necessary!
grips of necessity
(the real does/did not have to be or happen that way. the ‘real’ is the result of ="trms">contingencies and it can be undone by working the ="trms">contingencies, with ="trms">skill.)
laboring bodies, playing bodies, ="trms">sensuous bodies
(feminism='lgc'>:) you can't get freedom outside of mortality
="prgrph">-theology, the negative way of knowing, the necessary discipline of ="trms">positive affirmation in order to know what is not knowable, is a very helpful tradition


when it comes to ="trms">language we, humans, will always win over the ="trms">animals.
we will always be the ones who control the law, the ="trms">database.
(all is bad news both for the charismatic end="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angered Bangali tiger and the individual chicken in the food industry.)
fight the divisions and ="trms">differences
we are in a very bad place for ="trms">animals and woman

can we do without ="trms">instrumentalization='qstn'>?

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> ="trms">categories of killable='lgc'>--the ="trms">question of how we kill

the ="trms">question of one's-own-old-hat

regarding what you are against='lgc'>: we might find ourselves properly addressing a particular issue but having no ability to make political connection, to think beyond the ="trms">categories
='strcls'>*thinking='lgc'>: a ="trms">materia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list practice with other thinkers='lgc'>--done best as ="trms">storytelling

for me politics is that to be able to locate ways of life that deserves work, that which deserve op="trms">position, that which deserve our curiosity

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%">
dis="trms">embodiment is a ="trms">technologically produced effect='lgc'>--many people are very ="trms">skillful in creating that effect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effects that are also ="trms">affect/="trms">affectional

(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway on ="trms">writing the cyborg manifesto) SK
the physiological state of neutrality is an ="trms">affective state
(='thdf'>the notion that violent and passion counts as ="trms">affect and neutrality is without ="trms">affect is chemically bizarre) ='lgc'>-- ="trms">neuro-chemistry of a certain kind of self-collection
refusing the division between ="trms">material and im="trms">material
to call information-="trms">world im="trms">material is wrong
(this is the base of ='mywrk'>my work related to ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway)
in the case of vision='lgc'>: the ="trms">material and the ="trms">semiotic always implode ='lgc'>[the ="trms">apparatus and the flesh='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the effect of ='strcls'>*dis="trms">embodiment is a ="trms">technologically produced effect='strcls'>* (that is also always ="trms">affectional) (we have to get good at producing it)
='lgc'>[...so she was among (1983 ="ppl">Marxist) feminists (and the figure of cyborg is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready in circulation for her='lgc'>--about the ="trms">questions of reproduction ="trms">technologies related to the ="trms">situation of women) without biological education='lgc'>--not only that, many of her feminist allies thought of biology as the enemy ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> anti="trms">natural rejection of the ="trms">sciences in feminist the agreement “that ‘="trms">nature’ is our enemy and that we must control our ‘="trms">natural’ bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> escalating logic of counterdomination='lgc'>] so her manifesto is all about that. biology is (a rich ="trms">fabulous practice and) never innocent, and it is something that ‘we mean’. in the sense of ‘what do you mean='qstn'>?!'='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[we are always telling knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">stories that we need ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> noninnocent='lgc'>]

(something is) boring ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> (something is) wrong

why do i ="trms">joke='qstn'>? it has to do with ="trms">storytelling.
anything anybody tells me i tend to believe='lgc'>--what i learn from whores

="large lg5" stl="font-size:118%"> working within an ="trms">apparatus of thinking in order to get somewhere in a sustained way and not to drift into as="trms">sociations as fast as... ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
i can't finish the sentence until i can pay attention to what ="trms">interrupts it. and if i syntactically require to come to the end of sentence, syntactically commits me to a ="trms">position i don't hold. the ="trms">technical requirement of clarity (and coherence='lgc'>--must learn how to do it). my ="trms">storytelling is about how not to reach the end of sentence. (that Peter noted as suspension)

='lgc'>['thinking pushed into syntax’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='mywrk'>my work ="trms">lecture-performances are about a thinking ="trms">excessing out of syntax. not all argumentation is made in syntax(= how a sentence must end), and turn it into a ="trms">skill of nonsyntactical ="trms">pragmatic ="trms">language ="trms">craft tradition, advocating the ='strcls'>*exceedingly ="trms">agential='strcls'>* ="trms">world ='lgc'>~= there is always ‘a whole lot is going on'='lgc'>]

the iterative and fractal quality of sentences
partial connections (of distinct entities) ='lgc'>~= analogy
analogy allows one part contaminate ="trms">systematically another part and vice versa

(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway on feminism)
feminist theory is especially good in getting at in particular ways doctrines of ="trms">nature's work to enforce ways of life on women, on people of color, on the enslaved, on those who do not possess the qualities of mind and self-possession, on those who are on the marked ="trms">categories to the unmarked. the feminist have been particularly good at getting how genre works. gender, in this regard. ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that female by ="trms">nature is committed to the ="trms">species and the male by ="trms">nature committed to transcendence.
='lgc'>[our in="trms">herited binaries ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] ="trms">formulations of ="trms">nature='lgc'>: executive/non-executive organs, immanence/transcendence, maintenance/novelty, catabolic(foru-sakht فرو ساخت, sukht سوخت)/anabolic(tarkib-saz ترکیب ساز) functions, ,,
="prgrph">-in ="ppl">Darwin's ="trms">writing, non-theological account of diversity on earth, we find both ="trms">interrupters and continuers of these particular notions of ="trms">nature

the ="trms">question of model, what is the model for what, what is similar to what='qstn'>?
='strcls'>****how do we do comparative thinking='qstn'>? comparative thinking depends on similarity  judgment and ="trms">difference judgment, and depends on good-enough models, and depends on a certain[...]