[...]o ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault='lgc'>]) were kept in La Force prison, a second Bastille, in Paris
='lgc'>=/= the nuns and devoted female ="trms">members of the church, who raised special concern when they were “possessed” by unexplained forces of demonic or ="trms">neurologic o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin


='strcls'>***(Ulrich Baer > ="ppl">Baxstrom='lgc'>:) Charcot ='lgc'>==> transformation of ='strcls'>*tableau vivant='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*tableau clinique='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: a hysterical reliving of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">symptom and reframed trauma that attempted to suspend the two temporalities (real ='lgc'>+ ="trms">imagined) in the same image='strcls'>***
='lgc'>[="frds">Sina ='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*tableau critique='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: ='qstn'>?='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud and Breuer's efforts (in “reliving” with hypnosis) to isolate the mechanisms of hysteria

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
Acta Sanctorum ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Attar's tazkirat ='lgc'>~ hagiography='lgc'>]
countless early descriptions of entities speaking through the mouths of girls and of the manifestation of “external signs” in the possessed ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Bryana

(as="trms">sociated with) possession='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•anesthesias
="lsts lst1">•amnesias
="lsts lst1">•subconscious acts
="lsts lst1">•="trms">somnambulisms
="lsts lst1">•fixed ideas
="lsts lst1">•


='strcls'>***conceptually arranged ="trms">abyss between outer and inner states ='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*="trms">literal mastery of nonsense='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==> gaining ="trms">="trms">empirical purchase over forces openly acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edged to be invisible and insensible in themselves='strcls'>***
="lsts lst1">•the exorcists (building upon the ="trms">techniques of inquisitors and witch-hunters) take on possession acted as the ='strcls'>*bridge across this ="trms">abyss='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">neurologists and psychologists draw unknowable forces out of the inner voids via the ='strcls'>*="trms">symptom='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--Malinowski='lgc'>='lgc'>--> witches, spirits, demons acting as middlemen and guids (='lgc'>=/= explicit target of inquiry) in the field of worker's journey to the dark cornerss of the real
='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Baxstrom's ="trms">anthropological insight is useful in artistic feedback, for) in ="nms">apass='lgc'>: (we use exorcist ="trms">technique ='lgc'>+ clinical ="trms">symptomology) to bridge across the ="trms">abyss between the artwork and artist (='lgc'>~ the ="trms">enunciation and ="trms">enunciator) ='lgc'>--="frds">Sina='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘="trms">enunciation is the guide to an ="trms">enunciator’ ='at'>#feedback


Levy-Bruhl's haughty binarized “us and them” (his focus on “the primitive” as a ="trms">category of ="trms">social analysis and his insistence upon an unbridgeable ="trms">epistemic gap) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> darker ="trms">history of human ="trms">sciences='lgc'>: an embarrassing ="trms">historical curiosity... ='strcls'>*an unsunstainable ="trms">position='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="ppl">Baxstrom='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Levy-Bruhl lost his ="trms">position in th canon because the logic of his arguments regarding the forces that shaped the life-="trms">worlds of non-western people denied the possibility of a field rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer's being able to assume the ='strcls'>*point of view='strcls'>* of the native in the bold manner that Malinowski declared was not only possible but actually the highest aspiration for ="trms">anthropology ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also the aspiration for critical feedback='qstn'>?='lgc'>]


(counter="trms">epistemological) Levy-Bruhl ='lgc'>=/= Malinowski ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]feedback='lgc'>: an art of engagement informed by critical relatedness and) ='strcls'>**="trms">anthropological expertise grounded in the careful cultivation of a ='strcls'>*="trms">sympathetic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the other='strcls'>* as a way of ="trms">="trms">empirically knowing that other='strcls'>** ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">method of ="trms">sympathetic as="trms">sociation='strcls'>*

in ="nms">apass ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the laboratory of the times located in the person of the rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer himself

grounded Levy-Bruhl's ="trms">science in the real ='lgc'><== he rejected a focus on a knowable singular subject in favor of a ="trms">science based on the ability to detect and ="trms">interpret the invisible forces that worked to produce a particular “mentality” ='lgc'>[of the artist in the case of bad feedback='lgc'>]
(Levy-Bruhl's mistake='lgc'>:) ="trms">systematic ="trms">interrogation and illumination of mobile invisible forces that produced beings wholly unlike us ='lgc'>=/=='lgc'>{ ="trms">method of ="trms">sympathetic as="trms">sociation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> participant observation='lgc'>: the felicity of evidence produced through the qualitative experiential ="trms">methodological ="trms">instruments ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> comes to define the modes of critical relatedness in ="nms">apass='lgc'>]


(since 15th century) investigators ='lgc'>==> staking one's claim to the real on the mastery of those forces that relentlessly elude a plain direct visibility or sensibility ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> human ="trms">sciences


='strcls'>*we still hunt ghosts, fueled by a desire operationalized in a ="trms">method of being close enough to something to sense it, because our form of mastery ="trms">demands a closeness to things unseen, unprovable, indeed ‘nonsensical,’ yet un="trms">questionably ‘there’='strcls'>* -="ppl">Baxstrom

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%">
="ppl">="ppl">Despret on ="ppl">Derrida's ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal
the act of being seen by an ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal ='lgc'>==> ="ppl">Derrida groups together on the end hand “="trms">scientists and philosophers ='lgc'>=/= prophets and ="trms">poets”
='lgc'>{ ="ppl">="ppl">Bateson, Goodall, Bekoff, Smuts, and many others have met the gaze of the living diverse ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals and in ="trms">response undone an redone themselves ='and'>& their ="trms">sciences ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Derrida ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>='lgc'>--> why did ="ppl">Derrida leave unexamined the practices of ="trms">communication outside the ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies he did know how talk about='qstn'>? ='lgc'>==> philosopher (speak in the absence of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal) ='lgc'>=/= theoreticians (speak face to face with the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal) ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">scientists
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Derrida's o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">positioning='lgc'>: to speak (starting) from ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ a partir de='lgc'>] a real ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal and not about ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animality ='lgc'>[being ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal='lgc'>] ='lgc'>: to speak in the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal's ="trms">presence and not in its absence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this ='lgc'>[this way of talking about ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal is against his philosophical tradition='lgc'>] is not particularly o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal, it is part of the very game of philosophy='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*to fight with ="trms">ancestors and contemporaries ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? recalcitrance تمرد tamarod='lgc'>] about great and noble ideas='strcls'>* (to denounce inequality and violence)

maintaining distance is a characteristic of the ="trms">episteme of the French philosophical tradition

the topic of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal in French tradition='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal can be a topic of philosophy if it is called up as a figure of otherness (or a figure of deprivation) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is that why i started to work and think about ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal ="trms">fables after i moved to germany='qstn'>? because i became identifiable as deprived other='qstn'>? and ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading about the naming and d="trms">enunciation of philosophical violence towards the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal became a proxy for philosophical violence towards myself as a foreigner='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal as ancient ="trms">ancestor (a search for ="trms">difference with appeal)
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**as a figure caught up in theoretical and abstract issues='strcls'>** (a philosophical ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> animots='lgc'>: paper ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals, abstract inexistent ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals
='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Derrida taking up the topic of the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal ='lgc'>==> to oppose a certain humanist hegemony, denouncing philosophical violence towards the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Derrida's rejection of philosophical game par excellence (the game that deals with re="trms">presentations, framework of re="trms">presentation)

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">

='heart'>♥ the parable of the twelfth camel
An old man, sensing his impending death, called to his side his three sons, to share with them the little he still owned. He said to them='lgc'>: my sons, I have eleven camels. I bequeath half of them to the oldest, a quarter to the second son, and to you, my youn="trms">gest, I give a sixth. Upon the father's death, the sons found themselves quite perplexed='lgc'>: how to divide their in="trms">heritance='qstn'>? A war over the division of goods seemed inevitable. With no apparent solution, the sons went to a neighbouring village to seek advice from an old sage. The old man thought awhile and then shook his head='lgc'>: I cannot resolve this problem. The only thing I can do for you is to give you my old camel. He is not very obedient and often does as he pleases. I don't know if you can use him but I think he may help you divide your in="trms">heritance. The sons brought the old camel back with them and divided up the in="trms">heritance='lgc'>: the first then received six camels, the second three and the youn="trms">gest two. This then left the camel of the old sage, which they could return to his owner.

        ,     ,
‘'’ ‘'’   ‘'’   ‘’

this parable reveals particular and essential dimension of all forms of in="trms">heritance='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Despret:='lgc'>] they place us in a ="trms">position of ="trms">obligation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to work out
="lsts lst1">•='lgc'>[="frds">Sina:='lgc'>] they had to go to the foreign to figure out their in="trms">heritance

="large lg5" stl="font-size:141%">
the sons have to work out the ='strcls'>*="trms">position of ="trms">obligation='strcls'>*

='strcls'>*****in="trms">heritance (passed on as something that appears impossible) as such requires you to ='strcls'>*start from='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= about, concerning, with='lgc'>] this in="trms">heritance
="lsts lst1">•“start from” implies precisely the fact of remaining ="trms">obligated to that ='strcls'>*from='strcls'>* which we speak, think, or act ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ learn from ='and'>& create from events='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•“being ="trms">obligated” implies learning to do, speak, act, decide, not about these events, not concerning them, not facing or against them, but from them
='lgc'>==> you are bound ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*you honor the terms of the problem='strcls'>* (such as it is posed along with its contra="trms">dictions ='lgc'>~ fubar)
='lgc'>==> (help you to) resist the common sense (or less common sense) solutions


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]in="trms">heriting='lgc'>: an act that ="trms">demands thought and commitment, an act that calls for our transformation by the very gift of inh[...]