[...]ameworks and experiences


="ppl">="ppl">Despret observing the ="trms">birds ='lgc'>+ their ethologist ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">birds made Zahavi ="trms">interesting

(="ppl">="ppl">Despret discovering that) any theory of re="trms">presentation was at once partial and totalizing, because it proposed to elucidate the complex work of ="trms">relations and encounters from the sole standpoint of the human

(how ="ppl">="ppl">Despret became) ="trms">interested in actual practices (with ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers and ="ppl">="ppl">Latour), in the way they ="trms">articulated ="trms">questions and ="trms">responded to ="trms">questions

='strcls'>****="trms">stories that ="trms">scientists ='lgc'>[and Disney or Hollywood='lgc'>] develop about ="trms">animals are also our ="trms">stories='strcls'>**** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> these ="trms">stories transform humans and their ="trms">animals
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sciences (of the contemporaneity) for which='lgc'>: ='strcls'>**production of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'> = production of a way of being='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (they do not reveal what ="trms">animals are, rather) they follow and accompany an act of becoming together ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*an act of becoming with the ="trms">stories that we construct concerning them='strcls'>* (good or bad)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">birds will have been far more ="trms">interesting starting from the moment that Zahavi proposed to connect their ="trms">stories to others ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> how ="nms">Cinderella became ="trms">interesting for me when her ="trms">stories became connected to other ="trms">stories ='lgc'>=/= restructure her ="trms">story to make her fit my contemporary political correctness='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•sheep will have been far more sophisticated starting from the moment that Thelma Rowell asked them ="trms">interesting ="trms">questions

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ='strcls'>**to ask ="trms">interesting ="trms">question='lgc'>: to create conditions in which sheep ='lgc'>[beings, your subject='lgc'>] are able to de="trms">monstrate an ="trms">interest in these ="trms">questions

='strcls'>**="trms">interesting research='lgc'>: looking at the conditions that allow beings to become ="trms">interesting


='lgc'>{ how ="trms">scientists made their ="trms">animals ="trms">agents='lgc'> = how ="trms">scientists created the conditions for certain ="trms">responses with respect to what was being asked of the ="trms">animals ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how these changing ="trms">animals ='strcls'>*became real='strcls'>* by way of the very ='strcls'>*test of transformation='strcls'>* that had been proposed to them (='lgc'>~ how they were involved in the “process of verification”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*to understand the ="trms">system of truth that was ay the heart of these tests='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= to produce an umpteenth critical analysis of “re="trms">presentation” ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Pierre)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> you are under the same constraints as those in whom you had placed your confidence

='at'>@="frds">Sina='lgc'>: do not construct knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge about your mother behind her back! ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> getting to know what ="trms">matters (to them, to her) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> allows transformations to occur
="prgrph">-i usually did both (as mentor in ="nms">apass), construct knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge behind people's back ='lgc'>[psychosis='lgc'>] ='and'>& getting to know what ="trms">matters to them ='lgc'>[="trms">paranoia='lgc'>]

(="ppl">="ppl">Despret discovered) one (unignorable) thing that ="trms">mattered to ="trms">scientists was='lgc'>: how ="trms">animals take an active part in the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that is produced about them


(why working on ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">bestiary involves becoming ="trms">interested in ="trms">sciences='lgc'>:) you work on ="trms">animals ='lgc'>--immediately='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you are marking on ="trms">scientists

i re="trms">member the way i anticipated where a pigeon, a cat, spider, or ants, would make a home, a niche, in my ="trms">childhood house...
the ="trms">difference between ‘what i ="trms">imagined’ ='and'>& ‘where the nest actually appeared’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> made the ="trms">world far more ="trms">interesting
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> looking at the perception of ="trms">animals (when you are ="trms">child)


inventive and remarkable ="trms">birds
happiness of sheep
sadness of captive wolves in a park in the Lorraine ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*not because they were captive but because captivity had transformed them into stupid and cruel beings='strcls'>*

='lgc'>[it is good to be able to say that='lgc'>] certain ="trms">scientists not only do “bad ="trms">science” (which remains a way of keeping distance) but that they do “="trms">science badly”


creatures that happened to be ="trms">animals
creatures that happened to be ghosts
creatures that happened to be ...


(the influence of) Anglo-Saxon ="trms">animal studies ='lgc'>[on me='lgc'>]


="large lg22" stl="font-size:108%"> (in ="ppl">="ppl">Despretian way) learning to think from ="trms">love


(the bad) ="trms">fable of coming out of the closet
there is no closet. there are transformations.
falling from a horse, on a path that no longer leads to Damascus

(the ="trms">story of) Saul does not answer God; he politely asks him to wait two minutes while he comforts his horse. let God wait; other things ="trms">matter ='lgc'><='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>-- this is where true conversation takes place

(a philosophy, or thought) one of='lgc'>: ="trms">obligation ='lgc'>=/= distance
(="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>:) ="trms">obligation ='lgc'>=/= requirements ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{='strcls'>*a distinction that is to be made='strcls'>*, to be created, to be invented, not acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edged as al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready manifest in the state of things='lgc'>}
="trms">obligation (is much more ="trms">demanding than) ='lgc'>=/= ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right
(="frds">Sina='lgc'>:) ="trms">obligation ='lgc'>=/= commitment
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]being ="trms">obligatet='lgc'> = agreeing to expose oneself to fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure, refusing to construct the words of order that would protect oneself from the requirements of the activity
='lgc'>{not all activities arise from ="trms">obligations='lgc'> = not all activities put themselves at risk, not all activities make an effort to ="trms">present themselves politically='lgc'>}

="large lg14" stl="font-size:103%">
="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's ="trms">writing ="trms">technique='lgc'>: a remedy for in="trms">difference and contempt ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*becoming attached to the multiple th="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads that make up the fabric of the ="trms">world='strcls'>*

(="ppl">="ppl">Despret ="trms">obligated to hear) the black="trms">bird sang as if the ="trms">world itself depended on its song ='lgc'>--and='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
='strcls'>*the importance of things came to dwell in its voice='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*the black="trms">bird made importance exist in another way='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*importance became incorporated in the ="trms">world='strcls'>*

and this importance rises like a ="trms">question ='lgc'>[a ="trms">question that comes after “what ="trms">matters for..."='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how can i now ="trms">write in such a way as to be worthy of what ="trms">matters, with a similar insistence, for another being='qstn'>? (my ="trms">question in ="nms">Cinderella diaries)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

my ="trms">history (of continuous ="trms">interest, or what created the next “='lgc'>='lgc'>-->”)='lgc'>:
="nms">iran / visual arts ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> germany / ="trms">lecture and performance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> research / ="trms">heritage study ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> case / ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">epistemology / ="trms">animal ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">science / ="trms">anthropology

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

home funerals put into practice an important dimensino of the lives lived by the deceased ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> participates actiively in the instauration of their existence
="prgrph">-instauration='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[re-="trms">storying='lgc'>] restoring, participating in a transformation that leads to a certain existence='lgc'> = to more existence, in the case of the deceased='lgc'>: both a biographical supplement and the accomplishment of an existence in another realm of reality ='lgc'>==Souriau='lgc'>='lgc'>==> brilliance of reality (of the dead)='lgc'>: regards of the existence of the deceased, provided we agree on the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right regime of reality that can be granted to them ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (envisioning de="trms">finition of the mode of existence)='lgc'>==enable='lgc'>='lgc'>==> to account for what the deceased do and what they have others do ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> describe how they ="trms">interfere in the lives of the living ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (we avoid the ="trms">trap of) the tradition that captures and generally freezes the problem, separating the ways of being into two ="trms">categories='lgc'>: “physical existence ='lgc'>=/= psychological existence” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the deceased='lgc'> = non-existence, fantasy, belief, ="trms">hallucinations... (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- bad for ="nms">ajayeb)

vigil
the deceased retain thier full relatinoal capacity
the midwives stress that it is important to carry on talking to them, with ="trms">love, soflty, carefully choosing one's words...
death ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> passage ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a medico-="trms">scientifice time frame in which the living have work to do (='lgc'>=/= the work of mourning)
body remains vibrant ="trms">matter ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ="trms">communication remains possible

taking care of events through their ="trms">affects

(="ppl">="ppl">Despret asks) what do we know about what the body continues to feel and causes the person to feel once it has stopped breathing='qstn'>?


death midwives
share the conviction that death is not a ="trms">matter of all or nothing
='lgc'>[people='lgc'>] can still talk to those who remain through ="trms">memories or thoughts that arise in their ="trms">presence
signs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> remain open to the possibility of being understood ="trms">differently

death ="trms">affects the face muscles in such a way that it produces a post-mortem smile (لبخند شهید) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*smile (that comforts) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ‘deceased='lgc'>: a particularly robust being’ that unifies two ways of being='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. he becomes an expressive ="trms">relational being
="lstsrd">2. his body becomes ="trms">matter for expressions

="large lg1" stl="font-size:113%"> midwife ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a possibility in the sense of “or else, also” (='lgc'>=/= “either or”), in the valuable grammatical register of conjuctions='lgc'>: and, and, and...


these expressive modes that require ='strcls'>*only recipients='strcls'>*, ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= explanation='lgc'>: to give the ="trms">phenomenon its ="trms">scientific imprimatur='lgc'>] they just call for one to take into account
="prgrph">-this is tricky if you are in ="nms">Iran's shia martyrdom culture or in the ="trms">presense of Western ="trms">authoritative ="trms">sensual teacher. can there be a deliberate coexistence ='lgc'>[an additive ="trms">epistemological engagement ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*affirmation of the possibility that multiple and contradictory versions coexist='strcls'>*='lgc'>] of (the current enchanted version='lgc'>:) لبخند شهید and (the comming disenchanted version='lgc'>:) secular imprimatur in ="trms">present ="nms">iran='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

the dead body is both ='strcls'>*biological ='and'>& sacred='strcls'>*, object ='and'>& subject, disenchanted ='and'>& enchanted

disjunctive and controversial (یا “or else”) ='lgc'>--(replaced by)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “and” that challenge medical ="trms">epistemology (each version “adds” to the current versoin rather than erase it)
="lsts lst1">•the fact that a smile can be a “="trms">natural” ="trms">phenomenon does not prevent him from having wanted to comfort his family
="lsts lst1">•the “and” introduces a non-polemical challenge (an ='strcls'>*open challenge='strcls'>* that opens up to other ="trms">narratives) in terms of “there is always something else"='lgc'> = a commitment (that transforms ways of thinking and ways of feeling) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= Holakouee's روشنگری enlightened secularism='lgc'>]

the deceased='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•they invite themselves into dreams
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>****they make ="trms">presence of ="trms">presence felt='strcls'>**** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> through stratagem (ruse of genre, ="trms">skill in devising plans or schemes)
="lsts lst1">•they play on coincidences ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (as far as they are connected) anything can be used to make a sign ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ='strcls'>**they are opportunists of enigma='strcls'>**
="lsts lst1">•they thwart all attempts to give meaning to the action
="lsts lst1">•they do have regularity ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (it is possible to constitute) ='strcls'>*a ="trms">science of the deceased='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[that fits them, one that describe them, that can ="trms">interpret in the sense of guiding a reply to what they want or request='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the deceased have='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦an ="trms">ecology='lgc'>: milieu is a cruicial issue for them (we sometimes witness real extinction in highly unfavorable niches)
="lsts lst2">◦an ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]ethology='lgc'>: (a practical ="trms">science of) ='strcls'>***what beings do and get others to do='strcls'>***='lgc'> = (a practical ="trms">science of) ='strcls'>**what they are capable of doing='strcls'>** (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the facts that it describes should only be described using the in="trms">finitve) ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Despret > ="ppl">Deleuze > Spinoza ='lgc'>=/= classical ethology='lgc'> = behavioral biology='lgc'>: studies primarily ="trms">specific instincts and invariants='lgc'>]

='lgc'>}='lgc'><='lgc'>--="ppl">Deleuze='lgc'>-- ='lgc'>[="nms">="nms">ajayebnameh عجایب نامه:='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*a practical ="trms">science of the manners of being='strcls'>* ="trms">interested in what the thing or the ="trms">animal can do ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ="trms">bestiary ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">authors) made a kind of register of the powers of the ="trms">animal (powers of the ="trms">world) ='lgc'>: an ='strcls'>*alimentary regime='strcls'>* that is about the modes of existence (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding inanimate things='lgc'>: the diamond, what can it do='qstn'>? what tests is it capable='qstn'>? what does it support='qstn'>? we define things by what they can do ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> it opens up forms of experimentation='lgc'> = my ="nms">ajayeb, ="nms">Cinderella diaries, Telegram ="trms">bestiary, ="ppl">="ppl">Despret's ethology) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ="trms">interested in what is called the ="trms">animal classification, one will define the ="trms">animal above all, whenever possible, by its essence (by what it is)='lgc'>]
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reinstituting ="trms">nature, ='strcls'>*one does not learn from beings turned into zombies='strcls'>* (deanimated) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (ethology is required to) address an ="trms">animal defined as non-in="trms">different='lgc'>: an ="trms">animal for which the way it is addressed ="trms">matters
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]ethology='lgc'>: a practical ="trms">science of the modes of ="trms">interrogating and experimenting with ways of being='lgc'> = ='strcls'>****a practical ="trms">science of the modes of attention='strcls'>**** (that are required by the ways of being of those it aims to study)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg10" stl="font-size:128%">
working on='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='lgc'>[with ="ppl">="ppl">Despret and ="ppl">Katie='lgc'>] How my “special things” belong also to others, and how in this belonging i can unlearn something about my things, call it ="trms">heritage
="lsts lst1">•in my own performances, the proposal that “="trms">story” and “medium” do not need to fit... is also why my ="trms">lectures don't produce similar joinings (for the audience)


every ="trms">phenomena is at the same time experienced, resisted, ="trms">measured, ="trms">enunciated, performed, ="trms">narrated

politics, ="trms">poetics and ="trms">affects of ="trms">finitude

fossil nihilism

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Frankenstein='lgc'>: an all-purpose modifier to denote ="trms">technological crimes against ="trms">nature='lgc'>--a criminal only after being left alone by his horrified creator
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we have failed to care for our own creations ='lgc'>: Frankenstein as a parable for political ="trms">ecology

to be coextensive with...
to become com="trms">positionist='lgc'>: one that sees the process of human development as a process of becoming ever-more attached to nonhuman ="trms">natures (='lgc'>=/= fallen from ="trms">nature)

="trms">story of ="trms">modernity='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•humankind's emancipation from ="trms">nature
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>***progress (forward movement of the arrow of time)='lgc'> = in="trms">difference to the ="trms">past='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">past='lgc'>: an archaic and d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous confusion”
="lsts lst1">•the confidence of being able to ="trms">differentiate clearly what in the ="trms">past was still mixed up='lgc'>: facts ='and'>& values

green politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> gloomy asceticism, a terror for trespassing ="trms">nature, and diffidence toward industry, innovation, ="trms">technology, and ="trms">science

='mywrk'>my work has been against ='thdf'>the notion of “="trms">nature='lgc'> = a hierarchical totality”

emancipation ='lgc'>=/= attachment ='lgc'>=/= intimacy

='strcls'>*environment='lgc'>: what appeared when unwanted consequences came back to haunt the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginators of collective ="trms">modernizing actions
='strcls'>*environmentalism='lgc'>: when the unwanted consequences are suddenly considered to be a ="trms">monstrosity (='at'>#apocalyptic) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> abstain ='and'>& repent ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo='lgc'>:

="large lg14" stl="font-size:100%"> environmenta="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list logic='lgc'>: “precaution='lgc'> = abstention”

‘global warming’ is an unintended consequence (like anything in earth) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="trms">narrative of attachment ='lgc'>=/= an scandal, end of the ="trms">world (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- apocalyptic ="trms">narrative of emancipation, ="trms">modernist myth of mastery)

pristine ="trms">nature ='lgc'>=/= our ="trms">nature ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= national park='lgc'>: a rural eco="trms">system complete with post offices, well-tended roads, highly subsidized cows, and handsome villages

(="ppl">="ppl">Latour giving the ='thdf'>example of theology='lgc'>:) ‘mastery ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> attachment’ ='lgc'>: “the christian God gets ="trms">folded into, involved with, implicated with, and incarnated into his creation.” ='lgc'>=/= a master who is freed from dependents
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dominion means attachment

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Mi You

="trms">modernization process of European ="trms">societies ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> secularity ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">religion='lgc'> = only one option among other ways of self-fulfilment and human flourishing”

='strcls'>*self-sufficient humanism has never existed on the same scale before in European ="trms">societies before the Enlightenment='strcls'>*

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#="trms">writing for mini-series ="trms">bestiaries
inspired by the https://www.in="trms">stagram.com/="nms">ajayebedidani/
="lstsrd">1. https://www.in="trms">stagram.com/p/CPYnbZnH2w3/ short episode at night in country X there is a talking apple that speeks in unknown ="trms">language. character acting, location garden, animation, play with mixed ="trms">CG architecture
="lstsrd">2.


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

borderline ="trms">animals ='lgc'>--in='lgc'>='lgc'>--> medieval ="trms">bestiary

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*alegorical ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eastern ="trms">fables ='lgc'>+ easter ='and'>& western ="trms">animal lore ='lgc'>+ christian Physiologus ='lgc'>[not ancient ="trms">sciences='qstn'>?!='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">bestiary

Physiologus, ="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> popular source for sermon ="trms">writers ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- relevance for ="trms">lecture performance='lgc'>]


="brkr">
='lgc'>[email to ="frds scrmbld">Mona='lgc'>]
bebin man ye chizi cherto pert sareham kardam. in gharare bere tu catalog alan
='strcls'>*working title for the ="trms">lecture at ="frds scrmbld">Mona's project “Rat Race”='lgc'>:
The Pray and The Visible ='lgc'>-- An ="trms">animal escape case
='strcls'>*short description='lgc'>:
the ="trms">lecture-performance approaches ='thdf'>the idea of the ="trms">animals’ “friendship” in a ="trms">historical and speculative look at the ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic geography of ="trms">fables from middle-south Asian ="trms">bestiary till pettube.com uploads.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg18" stl="font-size:105%"> ...political satire
="ppl">Obeyd ="ppl">Zakani - mush o gorbe



some of us are woman, ="trms">child, ="trms">animal
(="trms">coded as a girl)

(man up! woman up! ="trms">child up! ="trms">animal up! etc.)


the ="trms">world that is claiming me, ="trms">recruiting me, ...

if you are an ="nms">iranian ="trms">child you would know some violences...
end="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angered being, end="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angered ="trms">animal, if you are then you know what is a violent care.
='strcls'>*leaving unprotected='strcls'>*


becoming attached, making friends, putting together a family

like other ="trms">anxious creatures, I can exhibit friendliness (='lgc'>=/= keeping my stubborn alterity intact. how much space for the utter strangeness we are allowed or able to hold='qstn'>?)

an ="nms">iranian default ="trms">position


داستانِ dastan-e

="large lg6" stl="font-size:129%">
="trms">according to ="ppl">Heidegger='lgc'>:
thinking ='lgc'><-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> thanking
="trms">complaining ='lgc'><-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> explaining
(to explain ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? to thank)
(to ="trms">complain ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? to think)
='lgc'>[explain ='lgc'>: from Latin explain='qstn'>? ='qstn'>?(“I flatten, sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read out, make plain or clear, explain”), from ex- ='qstn'>?(“out”) ='lgc'>+ plan='qstn'>? ='qstn'>?(“I flatten, make level”), from planus ='qstn'>?(“level, plain”); see plain and plane.='lgc'>]


afformations

sexual arousal, and its ="trms">presence in freindship,
normalcy ="trms">codes, and institutionalizations of friendship (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> friendship insures the modeling of all ="trms">sorts of vital ethical and political dis="trms">positions)
(='at'>#="nms">harem)

pro-ject, intro-ject, and ob-ject
the things we introject,

fb

good example, bad example, etc.

if you “understand” someone you are off friendship
understanding presuposses distance and ="trms">difference
friendship must in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude disidentification
empathy replacing understanding='qstn'>? (do we really want an “empathic non-understanding”='qstn'>? to en="trms">fold the ="trms">spectator with..)
='lgc'>[empathic non-understanding='lgc'>: a ="trms">relationship that gives up the self's need for constant affirmation (="ppl">="frds scrmbld">Laura ="ppl">="ppl">Marks) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pulls us instead into a “meterial understanding” of our connection with other ="trms">animals='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> challenging the ="trms">ontological primacy of centers (in general and not only human center ="trms">stage)
“you are thrown off by this narcisistic extension that the other appropriated by your identification has become” (="ppl">Avital)
="prgrph">-disproportion is always ="trms">present and operating



i am not sure if there is an ="nms">iranian pop song we can agree to like (or to hit ‘like’)



="trms">symbolic ="trms">language
attaching sounds to things/="trms">animals/="trms">species when they were not visible
(“Never ignore a sound!”)


The jungle is a ="trms">social space. ='lgc'>{biological real, disciplinary boundary making ="trms">stories='lgc'>}


="trms">Children at age six are typically ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic

...youth “hanging out” in age-="trms">specific gangs they are “growing themselves up,” often in a milieu of violence and power

deprivation of (avuncular and) grandparental care ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> lifelong hostility to one's parents

elderly functions have been lost in dis="trms">integration

.

ok. let's put the whip down. the point is just to mention the word whip, and since you are all well trained, it does its job. we are all trained ="trms">animals, gathered here, calm and curious, want to investigate what or who is training us, whipping our asses, as="trms">sociating our senses with signals he or she or it sends to our bodies, being petted or molested by it...
="lsts lst1">•strong strangle-holds and deadlines

="large lg10" stl="font-size:104%">
Tintin and Milou companionship (Milou is the name of Hergé's first girlfriend)
Milou's his ="trms">internal monologue (addressed to the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader) until Haddock came in the series in The Crab with the Golden Claws.
Hergé always draws Snowy at particular angles
(Tintin in the Land of the Soviets)
='lgc'>[i am relating to my stay at Belgium='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

which orifices are opening up to which kind of phallus='qstn'>?
(the phallus of confession; I open up to you, you are ="trms">prior to me, you impregnate me,)

my repetition compultions


what offers me hospitality and shelter='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg18" stl="font-size:110%">
i am sorry to have to perform some ="nms">iranian ="nms">Tarof maneuvers in order to move or move on ironically ="nms">Tarof temporarily blocks the movement
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof belongs to the ="trms">tropes of (less violently appropriative or even nonappropriative='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>]) ="trms">greeting (in strictly ="nms">iranian sense,) “="trms">Greeting rellects the double movement of approach and withdrawal that issues in a passage tracking the movement in ="trms">history that defines the conditions of ="trms">historical existence.” (="ppl">Avital)
='lgc'>[if you don't ="trms">greet me i vanish in thin air! i am not kidding! i am also freaked out by those who pretend cool and that their arrival and existence dosn't depend on the other ="trms">greeting them. or, are the al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready ="trms">greeted by some other mechanisms that are not immediately visible to me='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-postponing the encounter
="prgrph">-as a ="trms">greeting ritual, ="nms">Tarof at once performs and tests the reliability of ="trms">social links
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof has everything to do with the ="trms">poetic act
="prgrph">-i like to open another trackline of research='lgc'>: does ="nms">Tarof appropriates the Other='qstn'>? (its ="trms">relations to violence='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof-="trms">greeting establishes a ="trms">relationality between... texts and ="trms">historicity='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-can we understand ="nms">Tarof that it o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginates the ="trms">relation between man and the divine='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>---"in="trms">finity after you!” (unendlich nach dir!)='lgc'>--intense intimacy of in="trms">finite belonging.
="prgrph">-merger of the sacred with terrestrial destinies. you are made a demigod at the moment of ="nms">Tarof
="prgrph">-a temporary co-belonging, in possession of the Other
="prgrph">-in which sense ="nms">Tarof offers trace of a ="trms">relation to an ungraspable alterity='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-between what and how it holds separation='qstn'>? (="nms">Tarof's very task is to hold together the separation)
="prgrph">-its ="trms">relations to the sacred='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-what kind of encounter takes place under the sway of the ="nms">Tarof='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-repeatability of the ="nms">Tarof is built into its singular occurrence
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof, a ='strcls'>*reciprocal promise='strcls'>* that aims to cor="trms">respond to the most essential level of the other.
="prgrph">-the ="trms">greeted is first and newly returned to his essence
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof corrupts ="trms">greeting
="prgrph">-the ="trms">story of turtle and two storks in Kelile Demne (کلیله و دمنه)='lgc'>: friedship due to adjacency and terms of nearness or farness to the other. (="nms">Tarof is activated by and sustains adjacency) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- delicate ="trms">trajectories of ="trms">greeting
="prgrph">-how do we ="trms">greet a dog. the sub="trms">mission necessary in ="trms">greeting. we submit to it when we ="trms">greet the dog. hi dog. what would a practical ="nms">Tarof with dog look like='qstn'>? do we have ="nms">Tarof with ="trms">animals='qstn'>? The ="nms">Tarof's ="trms">affection itself cannot be separated from a desire to dominate.

="ppl">Levinas ="trms">narrates a ="trms">greeting, when he was in a concentration camp in germany, they call them dog. then a stray dog shows up and they call him Bobi. when they came back from the dehumanizing labor of the camp, Bobi would run to them every day and ="trms">greet them. and that was what rehumanize them.

tarof and ="trms">complaint
(is tarof capable of forming a protest='qstn'>?)

="large lg22" stl="font-size:133%"> using ="trms">tropes of traffic in ="trms">different cultures with ="trms">relation to ="trms">tropes of ="trms">technology, mobility and constitution of freedom. in Germany talking about ‘rail’ and ‘track’, changing tracks, shifting tracks and so on, meaning there is a predefined ="trms">trajectory ="trms">systematically mobilizing the individual in plain of possibilities. in US people more use cars and car can go anywhere, park or decide when and in which speed to move on, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding complete autonomy on the direction and velocity of movement, accompanying the North-American notion of freedom and ="trms">relation to destiny. in ="nms">Iran the movement is also based on personal cars but everyone is stuck in traffic, so there is a freedom of choice implied and is initially available but then on the plain of possibilities there are all ="trms">sorts of ="trms">technologically ="trms">situated block-roads that traffic in and hinder motility. this is also a condition of ="nms">Tarof. “shoma befarmayid!” (after you!)

='strcls'>*="nms">Tarof might be as well a mode of resistance in order not to enter the economy of the other (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> at the mercy of the other), when they say “it's on me.”


="large lg22" stl="font-size:113%"> ="lsts lst1">•رودربایستی ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='qstn'>? a ='lgc'>[در رودربایستی گیر کردن='lgc'>] (a ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> حیا)


shah='lgc'>: one who sits while others stand ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> tarof as king's behavior (tarof is adab-e salatin='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">tasavof's tarof='lgc'>: takalof (='lgc'>=/= javan-mardi='lgc'>: ‘self='lgc'> = guest’)
Khhv0M9n5_g

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

every call to speak involves some violation and over-joy, putting oneself in a persecutory way on the line, what ="ppl">Sa'di calls in “Dar Favaede Khamushi” in 4th chapter of his Golestan ‘on the disadvantages of speaking’ or “On the Advantages of Silence” (="trms">Written in 1258 CE)



="trms">literate or ob="trms">literate



in="trms">finitely less violent ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that there is never absolutely nonviolent, a value in="trms">finitely small but never zero; infinidecimals
degree of violence='lgc'> = 1/x ='lgc'>{while “true”='lgc'>: x='lgc'>+1='lgc'>}


(="ppl">Augustine='lgc'>:)
(Because of the arbitrariness of being='lgc'>:) “to ="trms">love"='lgc'> = "I want you to be”
='lgc'>[we need to be witnessed:='lgc'>]
because “we have not made ourselves,” we “stand in need of confirmation. We are str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers; we stand in need of being welcomed”

='strcls'>*str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers and exch="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers (sarraf)


this is an artistic concern with foreign-policy


='lgc'>[="ppl">Arendt:='lgc'>] (in 20th century) shifts in the terms in which we locate the ethics and values of ="trms">responsibility
citizen ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> refugee
='lgc'>[="trms">demand for clear ethical ="trms">responsiveness='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*citizen='lgc'>: an entity assumed to occupy the secured ="trms">interior zones of polity (who generates the ="trms">affect and discourse of care, concern, ="trms">responsibility, and ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights;)
='strcls'>*refugee='lgc'>: foreign and shifting body with no home base[...]