[...] others, and how in this belonging i can unlearn something about my things, call it ="trms">heritage
="lsts lst1">•in my own performances, the proposal that “="trms">story” and “medium” do not need to fit... is also why my ="trms">lectures don't produce similar joinings (for the audience)


every ="trms">phenomena is at the same time experienced, resisted, ="trms">measured, ="trms">enunciated, performed, ="trms">narrated

politics, ="trms">poetics and ="trms">affects of ="trms">finitude

fossil nihilism

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Frankenstein='lgc'>: an all-purpose modifier to denote ="trms">technological crimes against ="trms">nature='lgc'>--a criminal only after being left alone by his horrified creator
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we have failed to care for our own creations ='lgc'>: Frankenstein as a parable for political ="trms">ecology

to be coextensive with...
to become com="trms">positionist='lgc'>: one that sees the process of human development as a process of becoming ever-more attached to nonhuman ="trms">natures (='lgc'>=/= fallen from ="trms">nature)

="trms">story of ="trms">modernity='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•humankind's emancipation from ="trms">nature
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>***progress (forward movement of the arrow of time)='lgc'> = in="trms">difference to the ="trms">past='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> “="trms">past='lgc'>: an archaic and d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous confusion”
="lsts lst1">•the confidence of being able to ="trms">differentiate clearly what in the ="trms">past was still mixed up='lgc'>: facts ='and'>& values

green politics ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> gloomy asceticism, a terror for trespassing ="trms">nature, and diffidence toward industry, innovation, ="trms">technology, and ="trms">science

='mywrk'>my work has been against ='thdf'>the notion of “="trms">nature='lgc'> = a hierarchical totality”

emancipation ='lgc'>=/= attachment ='lgc'>=/= intimacy

='strcls'>*environment='lgc'>: what appeared when unwanted consequences came back to haunt the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginators of collective ="trms">modernizing actions
='strcls'>*environmentalism='lgc'>: when the unwanted consequences are suddenly considered to be a ="trms">monstrosity (='at'>#apocalyptic) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> abstain ='and'>& repent ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo='lgc'>:

environmenta="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list logic='lgc'>: “precaution='lgc'> = abstention”

‘global warming’ is an unintended consequence (like anything in earth) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="trms">narrative of attachment ='lgc'>=/= an scandal, end of the ="trms">world (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- apocalyptic ="trms">narrative of emancipation, ="trms">modernist myth of mastery)

pristine ="trms">nature ='lgc'>=/= our ="trms">nature ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= national park='lgc'>: a rural eco="trms">system complete with post offices, well-tended roads, highly subsidized cows, and handsome villages

(="ppl">="ppl">Latour giving the ='thdf'>example of theology='lgc'>:) ‘mastery ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> attachment’ ='lgc'>: “the christian God gets ="trms">folded into, involved with, implicated with, and incarnated into his creation.” ='lgc'>=/= a master who is freed from dependents
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dominion means attachment

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Mi You

="trms">modernization process of European ="trms">societies ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> secularity ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> “="trms">religion='lgc'> = only one option among other ways of self-fulfilment and human flourishing”

='strcls'>*self-sufficient humanism has never existed on the same scale before in European ="trms">societies before the Enlightenment='strcls'>*

="large lg70" stl="font-size:116%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#="trms">writing for mini-series ="trms">bestiaries
inspired by the https://www.in="trms">stagram.com/="nms">ajayebedidani/
="lstsrd">1. https://www.in="trms">stagram.com/p/CPYnbZnH2w3/ short episode at night in country X there is a talking apple that speeks in unknown ="trms">language. character acting, location garden, animation, play with mixed ="trms">CG architecture
="lstsrd">2.


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

borderline ="trms">animals ='lgc'>--in='lgc'>='lgc'>--> medieval ="trms">bestiary

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*alegorical ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eastern ="trms">fables ='lgc'>+ easter ='and'>& western ="trms">animal lore ='lgc'>+ christian Physiologus ='lgc'>[not ancient ="trms">sciences='qstn'>?!='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">bestiary

Physiologus, ="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> popular source for sermon ="trms">writers ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- relevance for ="trms">lecture performance='lgc'>]


="brkr">
='lgc'>[email to ="frds scrmbld">Mona='lgc'>]
bebin man ye chizi cherto pert sareham kardam. in gharare bere tu catalog alan
='strcls'>*working title for the ="trms">lecture at ="frds scrmbld">Mona's project “Rat Race”='lgc'>:
The Pray and The Visible ='lgc'>-- An ="trms">animal escape case
='strcls'>*short description='lgc'>:
the ="trms">lecture-performance approaches ='thdf'>the idea of the ="trms">animals’ “friendship” in a ="trms">historical and speculative look at the ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic geography of ="trms">fables from middle-south Asian ="trms">bestiary till pettube.com uploads.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

...political satire
="ppl">Obeyd ="ppl">Zakani - mush o gorbe



some of us are woman, ="trms">child, ="trms">animal
(="trms">coded as a girl)

(man up! woman up! ="trms">child up! ="trms">animal up! etc.)


the ="trms">world that is claiming me, ="trms">recruiting me, ...

if you are an ="nms">iranian ="trms">child you would know some violences...
end="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angered being, end="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angered ="trms">animal, if you are then you know what is a violent care.
='strcls'>*leaving unprotected='strcls'>*


becoming attached, making friends, putting together a family

="large lg42" stl="font-size:121%"> like other ="trms">anxious creatures, I can exhibit friendliness (='lgc'>=/= keeping my stubborn alterity intact. how much space for the utter strangeness we are allowed or able to hold='qstn'>?)

an ="nms">iranian default ="trms">position

="large lg14" stl="font-size:105%">
داستانِ dastan-e


="trms">according to ="ppl">Heidegger='lgc'>:
thinking ='lgc'><='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> thanking
="trms">complaining ='lgc'><='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> explaining
(to explain ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? to thank)
(to ="trms">complain ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? to think)
='lgc'>[explain ='lgc'>: from Latin explain='qstn'>? ='qstn'>?(“I flatten, sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read out, make plain or clear, explain”), from ex- ='qstn'>?(“out”) ='lgc'>+ plan='qstn'>? ='qstn'>?(“I flatten, make level”), from planus ='qstn'>?(“level, plain”); see plain and plane.='lgc'>]


afformations

sexual arousal, and its ="trms">presence in freindship,
normalcy ="trms">codes, and institutionalizations of friendship (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> friendship insures the modeling of all ="trms">sorts of vital ethical and political dis="trms">positions)
(='at'>#="nms">harem)

pro-ject, intro-ject, and ob-ject
the things we introject,

fb

good example, bad example, etc.

if you “understand” someone you are off friendship
understanding presuposses distance and ="trms">difference
friendship must in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude disidentification
empathy replacing understanding='qstn'>? (do we really want an “empathic non-understanding”='qstn'>? to en="trms">fold the ="trms">spectator with..)
='lgc'>[empathic non-understanding='lgc'>: a ="trms">relationship that gives up the self's need for constant affirmation (="ppl">="frds scrmbld">Laura ="ppl">="ppl">Marks) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pulls us instead into a “meterial understanding” of our connection with other ="trms">animals='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> challenging the ="trms">ontological primacy of centers (in general and not only human center ="trms">stage)
“you are thrown off by this narcisistic extension that the other appropriated by your identification has become” (="ppl">Avital)
="prgrph">-disproportion is always ="trms">present and operating



i am not sure if there is an ="nms">iranian pop song we can agree to like (or to hit ‘like’)



="trms">symbolic ="trms">language
attaching sounds to things/="trms">animals/="trms">species when they were not visible
(“Never ignore a sound!”)


The jungle is a ="trms">social space. ='lgc'>{biological real, disciplinary boundary making ="trms">stories='lgc'>}


="trms">Children at age six are typically ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphic

...youth “hanging out” in age-="trms">specific gangs they are “growing themselves up,” often in a milieu of violence and power

deprivation of (avuncular and) grandparental care ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> lifelong hostility to one's parents

elderly functions have been lost in dis="trms">integration

.

ok. let's put the whip down. the point is just to mention the word whip, and since you are all well trained, it does its job. we are all trained ="trms">animals, gathered here, calm and curious, want to investigate what or who is training us, whipping our asses, as="trms">sociating our senses with signals he or she or it sends to our bodies, being petted or molested by it...
="lsts lst1">•strong strangle-holds and deadlines


Tintin and Milou companionship (Milou is the name of Hergé's first girlfriend)
Milou's his ="trms">internal monologue (addressed to the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader) until Haddock came in the series in The Crab with the Golden Claws.
Hergé always draws Snowy at particular angles
(Tintin in the Land of the Soviets)
='lgc'>[i am relating to my stay at Belgium='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

which orifices are opening up to which kind of phallus='qstn'>?
(the phallus of confession; I open up to you, you are ="trms">prior to me, you impregnate me,)

="large lg30" stl="font-size:132%"> my repetition compultions


what offers me hospitality and shelter='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

i am sorry to have to perform some ="nms">iranian ="nms">Tarof maneuvers in order to move or move on ironically ="nms">Tarof temporarily blocks the movement
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof belongs to the ="trms">tropes of (less violently appropriative or even nonappropriative='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>]) ="trms">greeting (in strictly ="nms">iranian sense,) “="trms">Greeting rellects the double movement of approach and withdrawal that issues in a passage tracking the movement in ="trms">history that defines the conditions of ="trms">historical existence.” (="ppl">Avital)
='lgc'>[if you don't ="trms">greet me i vanish in thin air! i am not kidding! i am also freaked out by those who pretend cool and that their arrival and existence dosn't depend on the other ="trms">greeting them. or, are the al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready ="trms">greeted by some other mechanisms that are not immediately visible to me='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-postponing the encounter
="prgrph">-as a ="trms">greeting ritual, ="nms">Tarof at once performs and tests the reliability of ="trms">social links
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof has everything to do with the ="trms">poetic act
="prgrph">-i like to open another trackline of research='lgc'>: does ="nms">Tarof appropriates the Other='qstn'>? (its ="trms">relations to violence='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof-="trms">greeting establishes a ="trms">relationality between... texts and ="trms">historicity='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-can we understand ="nms">Tarof that it o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginates the ="trms">relation between man and the divine='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>---"in="trms">finity after you!” (unendlich nach dir!)='lgc'>--intense intimacy of in="trms">finite belonging.
="prgrph">-merger of the sacred with terrestrial destinies. you are made a demigod at the moment of ="nms">Tarof
="prgrph">-a temporary co-belonging, in possession of the Other
="prgrph">-in which sense ="nms">Tarof offers trace of a ="trms">relation to an ungraspable alterity='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-between what and how it holds separation='qstn'>? (="nms">Tarof's very task is to hold together the separation)
="prgrph">-its ="trms">relations to the sacred='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-what kind of encounter takes place under the sway of the ="nms">Tarof='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-repeatability of the ="nms">Tarof is built into its singular occurrence
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof, a ='strcls'>*reciprocal promise='strcls'>* that aims to cor="trms">respond to the most essential level of the other.
="prgrph">-the ="trms">greeted is first and newly returned to his essence
="prgrph">-="nms">Tarof corrupts ="trms">greeting
="prgrph">-the ="trms">story of turtle and two storks in Kelile Demne (کلیله و دمنه)='lgc'>: friedship due to adjacency and terms of nearness or farness to the other. (="nms">Tarof is activated by and sustains adjacency) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- delicate ="trms">trajectories of ="trms">greeting
="prgrph">-how do we ="trms">greet a dog. the sub="trms">mission necessary in ="trms">greeting. we submit to it when we ="trms">greet the dog. hi dog. what would a practical ="nms">Tarof with dog look like='qstn'>? do we have ="nms">Tarof with ="trms">animals='qstn'>? The ="nms">Tarof's ="trms">affection itself cannot be separated from a desire to dominate.

="ppl">Levinas ="trms">narrates a ="trms">greeting, when he was in a concentration camp in germany, they call them dog. then a stray dog shows up and they call him Bobi. when they came back from the dehumanizing labor of the camp, Bobi would run to them every day and ="trms">greet them. and that was what rehumanize them.

tarof and ="trms">complaint
(is tarof capable of forming a protest='qstn'>?)

using ="trms">tropes of traffic in ="trms">different cultures with ="trms">relation to ="trms">tropes of ="trms">technology, mobility and constitution of freedom. in Germany talking about ‘rail’ and ‘track’, changing tracks, shifting tracks and so on, meaning there is a predefined ="trms">trajectory ="trms">systematically mobilizing the individual in plain of possibilities. in US people more use cars and car can go anywhere, park or decide when and in which speed to move on, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding complete autonomy on the direction and velocity of movement, accompanying the North-American notion of freedom and ="trms">relation to destiny. in ="nms">Iran the movement is also based on personal cars but everyone is stuck in traffic, so there is a freedom of choice implied and is initially available but then on the plain of possibilities there are all ="trms">sorts of ="trms">technologically ="trms">situated block-roads that traffic in and hinder motility. this is also a condition of ="nms">Tarof. “shoma befarmayid!” (after you!)

='strcls'>*="nms">Tarof might be as well a mode of resistance in order not to enter the economy of the other (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> at the mercy of the other), when they say “it's on me.”


="lsts lst1">•رودربایستی ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='qstn'>? a ='lgc'>[در رودربایستی گیر کردن='lgc'>] (a ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> حیا)


shah='lgc'>: one who sits while others stand ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> tarof as king's behavior (tarof is adab-e salatin='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">tasavof's tarof='lgc'>: takalof (='lgc'>=/= javan-mardi='lgc'>: ‘self='lgc'> = guest’)
Khhv0M9n5_g

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

every call to speak involves some violation and over-joy, putting oneself in a persecutory way on the line, what ="ppl">Sa'di calls in “Dar Favaede Khamushi” in 4th chapter of his Golestan ‘on the disadvantages of speaking’ or “On the Advantages of Silence” (="trms">Written in 1258 CE)



="trms">literate or ob="trms">literate

="large lg38" stl="font-size:113%">

in="trms">finitely less violent ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that there is never absolutely nonviolent, a value in="trms">finitely small but never zero; infinidecimals
degree of violence='lgc'> = 1/x ='lgc'>{while “true”='lgc'>: x='lgc'>+1='lgc'>}


(="ppl">Augustine='lgc'>:)
(Because of the arbitrariness of being='lgc'>:) “to ="trms">love"='lgc'> = "I want you to be”
='lgc'>[we need to be witnessed:='lgc'>]
because “we have not made ourselves,” we “stand in need of confirmation. We are str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers; we stand in need of being welcomed”

='strcls'>*str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers and exch="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers (sarraf)


this is an artistic concern with foreign-policy


='lgc'>[="ppl">Arendt:='lgc'>] (in 20th century) shifts in the terms in which we locate the ethics and values of ="trms">responsibility
citizen ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> refugee
='lgc'>[="trms">demand for clear ethical ="trms">responsiveness='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*citizen='lgc'>: an entity assumed to occupy the secured ="trms">interior zones of polity (who generates the ="trms">affect and discourse of care, concern, ="trms">responsibility, and ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights;)
='strcls'>*refugee='lgc'>: foreign and shifting body with no home base='lgc'>--has become the exemplary locus for any possible ="trms">cosmopolitan ethics

you feel like a foreign body until you finally get a job, ="trms">love, being ="trms">greeted,
(you may remain foreign until the other claims your body='lgc'>: the police, the ="trms">lover, the employer, some microorganism that make you sick, and so on.)


(="ppl">Nietzsche's view of) the friend as the future='strcls'>***
="ppl">Holderlin asking “Wo aber sind die Freunde='qstn'>?” (a central ="trms">complaint of ethical proportions and political consequence), (that they have not come to the place from which the ="trms">poet is ="trms">greeting) scattered or not yet in existence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of future friendship. (is he keeping the friend necessarily remote='qstn'>? out of political reach='qstn'>? ="ppl">Avital's asking, accusing ="ppl">Holderlin of singularization)
="prgrph">-Graeco-Roman model of friendship
="prgrph">-(is there a ="trms">specific ="nms">Iranian model of friendship='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">Tarof)
="prgrph">-political model of friendship (based on reciprocity)

Greco-Roman ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Mediterranean ="trms">World
="prgrph">-the “swimming-pool and spa” of the ="trms">Greeks and Romans='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-wherein the cultural preferences, ideas and sensitivities of these peoples were dominant
="prgrph">-their ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urbanites and ="trms">cosmopolitan elites
="prgrph">-="trms">mutual knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

politics of friendship in Kelileo Demne='lgc'>:
undiscovered treasures...
constantly warning of fall on the a="trms">symmetry
nonreciprocity
Kelile-o Demne is about ="trms">communal forms of fragile human existence
a project of (asserted) nonalienation
="prgrph">-destinal velocities (the Turtle, the storks, etc.)
="trms">fictioning totality of ="trms">nature, therefore, state
States of security, ="trms">nature of illusion,


="trms">finite essence of friendship

(is muslim paradice and general idea of akherat in the way of ="trms">finitude of friendship='qstn'>? what would friendship for a mojud-e okhravi mean='qstn'>?)
octo-paradisic ="trms">systems



="trms">animal husbandry
='lgc'>[husband='lgc'>: conserve, husband, economize, economise, spouse, mate,='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[husbandry='lgc'>: the practice of cultivating the land or raising stock='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

the national geography documentary crew and the editors ="trms">fabulating a ="trms">nature ="trms">story which comes to hang around in my family's lunch table culture. the ="nms">iranian mother and eating your ="trms">children ="trms">story of the lions. the multi ="trms">species ="trms">contingencies. my family culture="trms">naturally hanged on the ="trms">story of the ="trms">wild ="trms">nature, ="trms">wildness. what does it mean for my family in their ="trms">specific temporal location in ="nms">tehran ="trms">history='qstn'>? the disappearance of Gonjecshk ='lgc'>[Sparrows being replaced by ="ppl">="ppl">Starlings='lgc'>], parks ='lgc'>[numerous ="trms">stories of devastation='lgc'>], and the ="trms">anthropocentric state logic ='lgc'>[condition of the ="trms">zoos, hostility towards domestic dogs, etc.='lgc'>]='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-and as is the case with my family, they are so good at changing the subject, and all i have perhaps tried to performe is the ways we can stay with the subject of discussion around our lunch tables, to stay with this particular ="trms">story and not that. (althought i have been changing the subject constantly myself...)
="prgrph">-the absence (minimum ="trms">presence) of ="trms">animal in my family, and the ways the ="trms">animal ="trms">story circulate and live there. what is the ="trms">animal holding in my family='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-="trms">stories or ="trms">fables that permit ="trms">wonder, or allow perhaps to approach crows or cats as creatures who could be capable of ="trms">contingent cooperation or multi="trms">species companionship. ='lgc'>[i am referring to the video of the ="trms">wild ="trms">animal taking care of the baby pet, the popular video in ="trms">social media that t="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riggered the discussion about ="trms">wild and domesticity during the lunch between my family ="trms">members. an object that captured the dialectic of desire and disgust in my human family's ="trms">response to the ="trms">animal.='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is what I call ="trms">cosmology='lgc'>: beings that depends on their placing within a particular ="trms">cosmology. ="trms">cosmology is very much alive ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- ='lgc'>[="trms">animals fitting in the visual ="trms">rhetoric of web-based digital media is itself to be investigated... ="trms">social ="trms">relations, ="trms">social ="trms">animal, contemporary ="trms">cosmology='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-the minimum ="trms">relationship with feral cats, and rats, and pigeons (and their ="trms">material environment.) and ambiguity towards them. evoking ="trms">responses of ="trms">affection, disgust, fear, and in="trms">difference.
="prgrph">-="trms">relationships between people, ="trms">animals and place='strcls'>**** ='lgc'>[a place as complex as ="nms">Tehran's ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban environment with its politics, televised operations, its ‘="trms">wilderness,’ and ="trms">technologically mediated ="trms">stories and ="trms">rumors that populate its landscape.='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> are we having a ="trms">Historical change='qstn'>? in ="trms">epistemic principles ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is inside and what is outside ='lgc'>[keep in mind the ="trms">historical moment in ="nms">iran's political isolation. is this reflecting the ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of feral ="trms">animals of everyday life='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-my family was able to talk ="trms">differently and find other expressions about violence in the landscape of ="nms">tehran by applying the ="trms">animal ="trms">story (to the head and heart.) ='lgc'>[this is also Kelile o Demneh.='lgc'>] the video was a heart-breaker. it had a healing moment, and their resistance to its o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginality as a tale of friendship is meaningful, the violence is solid and a-="trms">priori to companionship, and it supported the ="trms">story of kinship instead of friendship. This ="trms">story also promoted the ="ppl">Descartes’ ="trms">beast-machine hypothesis, that the ="trms">wild-being is devoid of intentions and is like a timepiece with regular motions, that the ="trms">animal is object and not subject, ="trms">beast-machine.
="prgrph">-my mother's ="trms">relationship to the lions eating their offspring, octopus eating their mate, or cats licking their genitals and dogs filth scavenging='lgc'>--polluters of domestic space, cockroaches “belonging” to an stratum below civilized life, the “out of place” and abject owl, ="trms">species sexual dis="trms">positions and ="trms">different coupling, sug="trms">gest difficulty in an ="trms">anthropocentric expectation of alterity. ="trms">animals ="trms">simultaneously despised and admired ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- ='thdf'>the idea of eating your (so-called) “="trms">loved-one” (not a suitable object for ="trms">affection) refutes cross-="trms">species identification ="trms">according to ="trms">anthropocentric standards. ='lgc'>[windows of opportunity for cross-="trms">species bonding, domestic-wanna-be-feral ="trms">story, myth of mental intention and ="trms">animal flesh, irreducible heterogeneous ="trms">ontologies and involvement of human-="trms">animal in multiple ="trms">agencies, normal ="trms">stories of becoming human, ='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-which ="trms">animals are regarded as transgressive and ambiguous in ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>? and which aren't='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-resisting any openness to ='thdf'>the idea of feral ="trms">animal that was expressed in my family, a meaningful discomfort, actually entails the fear of finding that we are not so ="trms">different from ="trms">animals, within the violent landscape of contemporary ="nms">tehran.
="prgrph">-dust. fixation on clearing the dust out

this is one pattern of exchange.

(another ="trms">interference='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*In Pinocchio we have the excellent cooperation between the cat and the fox, who are forming a cunning and successful participatory alliance to trick Pinocchio='lgc'>: the hybrid-robot who doesn't understand his own potentialities and wants to be so-called human, the ="trms">animal-betrayer. the fact that he can be tricked by the cat/fox is what making him human.
="lsts lst1">•and Geppetto, oh my god, (he is Yunnos/Jonah='qstn'>?) working on a project inside the fish, colloquial activity and asceticism registered with the fish ="trms">interiority. Geppetto-pop is refound or saved='qstn'>? by the non-truth seeking robot! ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> breaking his self-sur="trms">veillance as a characterization of pictorial objectivism, a form of moral self-control of ="trms">natural-philosophical style.
="lsts lst1">•i rather go with the ="trms">animal style, the con of Gorb-e nar-e ='and'>& Rubah-e makar گربه نره و روباه مکار they are opaque and transparent at the same time
="lsts lst1">•the signifying ="trms">animal, machine, and human in Pinocchio ="trms">story is ridiculous!
="lsts lst1">•towards ="trms">responding to “opacity” (opacity is complicated philosophical ethical issue regarding ="trms">animality and humanity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> refraction. with opacity what is at stake is our “="trms">material understanding of our connection with other ="trms">animals” (="ppl">="ppl">Marks, touch 39)


(we are talking about) ="trms">Fables of ="trms">Animal Subjectivity ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Kenney='lgc'>]

="trms">apparatuses of subject formation

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

THE prey and THE visible (both are ="trms">categories of forest life survival ="trms">stories. also have high stakes in ="nms">iranian culture, thought, and philosophy)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is important for a living self='qstn'>?

(bab-e) hekayat-e dusti-e kabutar o zagh o mush o bakhe o aahu o ...
بابِ / حکایت دوستی کبوتر و زاغ و موش و باخه و آهو و ...
='lgc'>[everyone='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[the ="trms">story of the friendship of these ="trms">animals; the quality, properties, and pitfalls of ="trms">relation='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•what is (re)activating the ='strcls'>*="trms">imaginary friend='strcls'>*='qstn'>? (is it really fully on shut-down='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">trap to abstract thought='qstn'>? ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this ‘abstract thought’ is d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous for “sadness” to get lost in it, but it is amazing for “joy”
="lsts lst1">•how much we need sadness='qstn'>?

why jackal is so persistent and play-full (full of “plays”) in Kelile o Demne's ="trms">bestiary='qstn'>?


="trms">bird people
,
fox people

,


arbab-e اربابِ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dar bab-e در بابِ
(let's do this conversion, we are not “arbab”/master of the ="trms">story nor ethics or anything else, we like to create “dar bab-e”='lgc'>: doors/openings into ="trms">different possible path ways)
(it is about teller not fully understanding the ="trms">story)



="large lg18" stl="font-size:129%"> ‘shekar’ ='lgc'>[شکار prey='lgc'>] and ‘ashkar’ ='lgc'>[آشکار visible='lgc'>], two entities in play, like the game of stone-paper-scissors, a link in our shared ="trms">literature that relates the perceptible to the subject of hunt. in a discourse of friendship and enmity, the visible anticipating itself as target for violence, becomes meaningful when we approach it in a game-theoretic-="trms">semiotic linkage, relating and tying together issues of voyeurism, sur="trms">veillance, violence, media and mediation, and predation in ="trms">poetic itineraries.

='lgc'>[business='lgc'>] friendliness, تعارف ="nms">Tarof and ="trms">greetings ='lgc'>[and its artificial inseminations='lgc'>] (sometimes) is it covering up or masking really predatory behaviors(='qstn'>?)


and in Kelile o Demne,

کلیله و دمنه Kelile o Demne (i am becoming more convinced that) is (all) about the ="trms">phenomenology of ='strcls'>*friendship and the ='strcls'>*contract


="ppl">Sa'di is the theoretician of friendship (“mojaverat” مجاورت) and Kelileo Demne is the theoretician of “sherarat” (شرارت villainy, felony) saying that the closeness of ="trms">different subjects is catastrophic ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> proper ="trms">differences between kinds and subjects.='lgc'>] ="ppl">Sa'di is ="trms">writing golestan گلستان and bustan بوستان at the time of the Mongols threat='lgc'>='lgc'>---it is the news of the Mongols coming and we know about the velocities of news can penetrate within the ="trms">thick walls of any city. ="ppl">Sa'di is theorizing proximity based on “mohabat” (محبت ="trms">love, Liebe and kindness), he assembles a setting of ‘garden’ for the coming of Mongols army. Kelileo Demne's project is pessimist ="trms">pragmatism, mobilizing ethics in a milieu of violence and power.



='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">story of ="trms">birds en="trms">trapped escape away with the cage
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">story of cat and mouse project
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bat and owl
='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> scorpion and..


="ppl">Shakespearean villain ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ="trms">nature ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- i prefer Ursula, evil corporally located='lgc'>]
="trms">modern villain ='lgc'><='lgc'>== power struggle


کلیله و دمنه Kelile Demne is full of disastrous laws of encounter and encounters of law
a ="trms">sort of a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics of ="trms">presence (imposing and projecting to and with ="trms">animals) that regulates the possibility of a pedagogical encounter
="lsts lst1">•no mediated forms of ="trms">presence and so on
="lsts lst1">•nobody breaking the ="trms">semiotic rules
="lsts lst1">•what subject-="trms">supposed-to-know
="lsts lst1">•what blocks cordial dis="trms">position and ="trms">animal amity='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•what genital lickings are welcomed or unwelcomed and discouraged or abandoned='qstn'>? and so on


to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read Kelile Demne not as something that works as legitimator

="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and ="trms">greeting


to form (an) intention


all that ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism performs and withholds on and with ="trms">animality

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Rickels='lgc'>]
(my) ="trms">animal-findings and fairy-tale as="trms">sociations

if dogs ="trms">communicate through their trainability cats redirect lines of ="trms">communication through play. the dog waits and watches, the cat looks and looks, which when is your turn to be looked at, can be therapeutic or unnerving.

meeting the cat half-way

="large lg14" stl="font-size:114%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Avital='lgc'>]

the ="trms">greeting ‘hello’, the initiatory and inaugural moment of our encounter

the gift sabotaging the freedom of the subject to receive ="trms">greeting or offering ="trms">greeting
a gift that becomes a curse for the person,

who has the civic stability to refuse a ="trms">greeting='qstn'>?
the finantialy challenged and the ="trms">greeting



explore friendship as a crucial modeling of justice='qstn'>?

con="trms">figuration of encounter

It doesn't always have to be ="trms">science ="trms">fiction, risking the wrong blend and watching the uncontrollable spill of consequences ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hook up friends

friendship, as ="ppl">Avital practices it, should often involve triangulation and the drama of departure='qstn'>?

I found myself (also) tempted to reduce her/him/you to sameness,

“meant to be,” relying on a kind of ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical latency.

invasion with little violation(='qstn'>?)

(In ="trms">rhetoric='lgc'>:) ="trms">citation='lgc'> = apostrophe ='lgc'>[address to an absent or ="trms">imaginary person, calling to the other='lgc'>]

(i am late. i am transed late. ="trms">translation and trans-="trms">relations has everything to do with latency. )


="ppl">Avital='lgc'>: For ="ppl">Bataille, friendship is part of the sovereign operation and is linked to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading.

="large lg34" stl="font-size:109%"> apostrophe (="trms">citation) for ="ppl">Derrida is the possibility of postmortem discourse ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">memory, acts of bringing back, recalling

can we take out no insurance policies to safeguard thinking or ="trms">writing or building='qstn'>?

(="ppl">Lyotard's) différend='lgc'>: a dispute or ="trms">difference that cannot be resolved by the cognitive or ="trms">linguistic resources we have at hand ='lgc'>--(indicating rather)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a rupture in the ="trms">presentation of testimony (='lgc'>~ litigate)

something you could turn your tattooed back on


(='at'>#='mywrk'>my work on ='lgc'>[post-feminist='lgc'>] ="nms">harem)
(companionship and sexuality and installations of ="trms">community) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> The Inoperative ="trms">Community ='lgc'>[="ppl">Bataille, ="ppl">Blanchot, ="ppl">Nancy='lgc'>]
(how to) create ="trms">community wherever I go='qstn'>?
(establish ="trms">relationships='lgc'>: humor, kindness, attention, reworking, “re-”, festivity, moderate arousal, silliness, playfulness, support,)
learning making a “="trms">fictive kin group in training” (how to learn to notice each other='qstn'>? how to learn to be in the same game='qstn'>?)
to insisted on ="trms">community without relying on transcendence ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">communion
(="trms">community without illusions about itself)
a ="trms">community that is self-annulling but ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous (="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorously ="trms">perverse)
(='lgc'>--the duties of the survivor)
="prgrph">-this is about creating convivial spaces (='lgc'>=/= ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban design ideology)
(to set up around) work ='lgc'>=/= (bodies of) knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
(let's make this an ="trms">obligation='lgc'>:) to create an atmosphere in which ="trms">interesting mistakes can get made
let's bring a huge amount of ="trms">material what we get into trying to di="trms">gest
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[an effect of being in Europe ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=>='lgc'>] is ="nms">harem about having a space/time to claim as my own='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[it can never be='qstn'>?='lgc'>] an actual space which i can dream of and re-create and hope toward='qstn'>? retrieving a mythic place of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>[that cannot be rebuilt='lgc'>]='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*the ="nms">harem girls my ="trms">ancestors='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">Cinderella

='lgc'>=/= longstanding tradition of seeing the female experience as ‘inherently’ painful (as in the pathos of The Handmaids Tale TV series)

(='at'>#="nms">harem Manifesto)='qstn'>?

..telos of anything ='lgc'>{in ="nms">apass, my bow and arrow='qstn'>? (='lgc'>=/= a ="trms">generalized claim) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it was about knowing the energy of each other and trusting the honesty and coherence of directional postures and ="trms">responsive movements. ='lgc'>[='at'>#="nms">harem='lgc'>] (='strcls'>*) one's game might be geared to build success ="trms">according to one's goals, but unless the game engages the other, it is worthless. (='strcls'>* it is about) learning how to wit. (='strcls'>*) my bow and arrow in use, my ="trms">tropes and abstractions, what are they good for if others don't play/engage with them='qstn'>? to recontextualize ‘="trms">method’ and ="trms">methodology. (='strcls'>*) “incommensurable tacit knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges of diverse ="trms">communities of practice” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">communication” across irreducible ="trms">difference (where “="trms">method” is not what ="trms">matters most;) (game of) “="trms">situated partial connection” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> subjects
(not always the human ="trms">language is the medium) two-way conversation ='lgc'>=/= naming (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= intention-laden and consciousness-ascribing ="trms">linguistic practice) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sometimes not God, logos, or sujet ="trms">suppose savoir, rather a dog makes you (in whose image='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is about making our ="trms">categorical labor harder='lgc'>}

it is about a politics dis="trms">interested in='lgc'>: self-identity, realization of intention, transcendence, ‘sweet and nice “feminine” ="trms">worlds and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges free of the ravages and productivities of power’ (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway 2003), cultural relativism, master-slave discourse,

='strcls'>**="trms">mutuality is mutability is ="trms">contingent is ="trms">historic='strcls'>** (='lgc'>=/= reciprocity, mo'amele be mesl معامله به مثل ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> retaliatory, ="trms">categorically the ="trms">relation of enemies)



(things to vandalize='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•capital claims
="lsts lst1">•mystical foundations of ="trms">authorship
="lsts lst1">•legally protected stores of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="lsts lst1">•desire for legitimacy
="lsts lst1">•control freak of the possibilities of comprehension
="lsts lst1">•="trms">narcissistic comfort of secured sense
="lsts lst1">•="trms">geometrical optics of reflection


(="ppl">Burroughs='lgc'>:) “steal everything in sight.” (most ="trms">authors transvaluate theft back into property ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ideologies of “influence”)

="trms">narcissistic reappropriation of/as friendship ='lgc'>: operate a reduction of the friend to the same or to the friend as other
mystified oneness of the Volk (Germanic ="trms">trope)
the desired erasure of ="trms">difference

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

friendship in Qur'an='lgc'>:

='lgc'>[44:41='lgc'>] The day on which a friend shall not avail (his) friend aught, nor shall they be helped, (apocalypse is defined when friendship ends)

='lgc'>[42:9='lgc'>] Or have they chosen protecting friends besides Him='qstn'>? But Allah, He (alone) is the Protecting Friend. He quickeneth the dead, and He is Able to do all things. (God is jealous of friends)

='lgc'>[70:10='lgc'>]
And no familiar friend will ask a ="trms">question of his friend
And friend shall not ask of friend

='lgc'>[32:4='lgc'>] ... Ye have not, beside Him, a protecting friend or mediator.
='lgc'>[29:22='lgc'>] ='and'>& ='lgc'>[42:31='lgc'>] Ye cannot escape in the earth, for beside Allah ye have no protecting friend nor any helper. (God has no friends. You only friends with him.)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:110%"> ='lgc'>[22:13='lgc'>] ...evil friend (friendship with the evil)
='lgc'>[57:15='lgc'>] ...your abode is the fire; it is your friend and evil is the re="trms">sort.
='lgc'>[19:45='lgc'>] “O my father! I fear lest a Penalty afflict thee from (Allah) Most Gracious, so that thou become to Satan a friend.”
(evil and friend coming adjoint more than once)

='lgc'>[25:28='lgc'>] Alas for me! Ah, would that I had never taken such an one for friend!

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(mode-identifying signs falsified)='lgc'>--(unconsciously='qstn'>?)
manipulative simulation of friendliness
\\



(in Germany) we need ‘detours’ and taking detours ='lgc'>=/= having end-goals

we are not built to handle peace ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> existence is perhaps ok, but coexistence is a real problem
coexistence in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes all ="trms">sorts of aggressions

burdened with a ="trms">bird name
(="trms">birds of ="ppl">Attar)

20 minutes to propose some itineraries

all the ="trms">different ways we come to life. (some even through violation, being shaken awake, libidinal surge, thrill, etc.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the delusion to desiring nonviolence (whenever there is desire there is violence)
wanting, desire ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> violence
(نیاز niaz ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> azar آزار)

which organs of peacefulness are we resisting='qstn'>?

='lgc'>{punishment, wanting to be punished='lgc'>}
delivery (not ‘from’ but) ‘of’ punishment
(for ="frds scrmbld">Varinia='lgc'>: what about the people feeling guilting and destructive who rush to the judge or the penal ="trms">system confessing and begging for punishment='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--where is the figure of persecutor located at her practice='qstn'>? if at all addressed.)
(='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>: how do i deal with helplessness='qstn'>? the Hilflosigkeit is primal, ='lgc'>[the start-up engine of psychoanalysis, powerlessness and power-fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure.='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (then let's ask) where does it hurt='qstn'>? in the eyes='qstn'>? ears='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--for ="frds scrmbld">Varinia it hurts on the neck)
="prgrph">-and despair
="prgrph">-and distress

when I punish you...

i cannot say if our encounter is ="trms">specifically ="ppl">Levinasian

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Chris ="ppl">Philo and ="ppl">Chris ="ppl">Wilbert='lgc'>]

‘="trms">natural’='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-="trms">scientist's site of fieldwork
="prgrph">-="trms">natura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list's site of biological conservation
="prgrph">-entrepreneur's site of capital accumulation
="prgrph">-poacher's site of prey
="prgrph">-soldier's site of refuge
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> geographies of human struggle, politics, colonialism, capitalism, ="trms">intervention,

what is shapping in these sites (="trms">science labors, ="trms">natural parks, pig and chicken farms, mobile phones, etc.) human-="trms">animal ="trms">relations (in their widely divergent kinds)='qstn'>?
(="trms">technology, ethics, welfare and politics in ="nms">Tehran)

the ways my mother thinks about the diffission of ="trms">animals’ bodily wastes beyond the bounds of their immediately ="trms">present='lgc'>: dog's poop, etc. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> spatial externality of ="trms">animals (='lgc'>--"they contaminate!”)

in the case of mobile phone ="trms">animal ="trms">meme, the human-="trms">animal ="trms">relation does not operates solely through the physical proximity of humans and ="trms">animals, but rather a wider geography, and ="trms">networks the ="trms">interiority of ="nms">Tehran domestic environments.
="prgrph">-as the house becomes cleaner, the public domain becomes more feral, and the ="trms">animal more contagious, and the proximity more virtual, and the cross-="trms">species ="trms">relationships and pictural,
="prgrph">-="trms">questions of the vital, the d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous, and the ="trms">wild (in ="nms">tehran)

“='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]="trms">animals, especially dead ones, enter centrally into what humans can themselves be and do in the ="trms">world.” (Cockburn)

i am trying to establish an ="trms">anthropological, ="trms">sociological and psychological investigations in this ="trms">matter, calling for a ‘cultural ="trms">animal geography’ that focuses on the complex entanglings of human-="trms">animal ="trms">relations with space, place, location, environment and landscape. ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> topology(s) ='lgc'>{it means that spaces and places involved make a ="trms">difference to the very constitution of the ="trms">relations in play='lgc'>}
='lgc'>[="nms">Tehran='lgc'>: ="trms">wilderness ='lgc'>~ public ='lgc'>~ non-domesticity='lgc'>]

...differing peoples in differing periods and ="trms">worldly contexts='strcls'>***

="trms">societies in a host of settlements, fields, farms, factories, ="trms">imaginary, ="trms">literary, psychological and virtual spaces (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> and how ="trms">animalhuman is ="trms">socially defined)

="trms">technologies of human orderings ='lgc'>: telegram='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[encountering all kinds of inventiveness that go on cross-="trms">species (human, ="trms">animal, ="trms">story, image, media), the kind of ="trms">semiotic work='lgc'>]

='strcls'>*Space='strcls'>* (="ppl">de Certeau) ='lgc'>: A place (lieu) is the order (of whatever kind) in ="trms">accord with which elements are distributed in ="trms">relationships of coexistence. It thus ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes the possibility of two things being in the same location (place.) The law of the ‘proper’ rules in the place='lgc'>: the elements taken into consideration are beside one another, each ="trms">situated in its own ‘proper’ and distinct location, a location it defines. A place is thus an instantaneous con="trms">figuration of ="trms">positions. It implies an indication of stability.
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> space as the ‘scheme of things’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">species-identifying
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">imaginal space, ="trms">animal space, ="trms">memory, dream, etc.

‘="trms">species-identifying’ (classification) in='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•pre-Neolithic totemic ="trms">societies (="ppl">Shepard 1993)
="lsts lst1">•biblical classifications of the ="trms">different ="trms">beasts (Leviticus='lgc'>: Sibley 1995)
="lsts lst1">•ancient and medieval ‘great chain of being’ thinking (="trms">Lovejoy 1936)
="lsts lst1">•Linneaus's ="trms">Systema ="trms">naturae
="lsts lst1">•tabular re="trms">presentations of the ="trms">natural ="trms">world (Frangsmyr 1983; Spary 1996)
="lsts lst1">•...

understandings of what comprises an ="trms">animal is ="trms">different in each case.
what should be ="trms">interested='qstn'>?

“(elaborating on ="ppl">Shepard,) Ingold (1994) sug="trms">gests that hunter-gatherers generally view the distinction between humans and ="trms">animals as permeable and easily crossed, unlike what is taken as ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read in much Western ="trms">science and philosophy.”

when/how you are persuaded to portray yourself as the relevant ‘expert’ in whatever field='qstn'>?

who are the legitimate spokespersons for ="trms">animals='qstn'>? once ="ppl">Attar, and now biology sci.
(‘the ="trms">modern constitution’ is as guilty as mysticism's ="trms">literacy)

...and that strong human sense of the proper place of ="trms">animals (which they should occupy physically) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">material-conceptual (double) placement ...(‘scheme of things’ ='lgc'>[="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">animals ="trms">supposed to be found in the non-discursive spaces and places of the ="trms">world) (or on the television)
="prgrph">-Said='lgc'>: ‘="trms">imaginative geography’, geographical ‘othering’
="prgrph">-overlappings that we find in telegram ="trms">social media ="nms">tehran ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what kinds of ‘="trms">animal’ (which ="trms">animalities) are at stake there in the mobile phone's ="trms">interface='qstn'>?

In recent years ="trms">zoos have reinvented themselves as ‘arks’


="trms">animals ="trms">categorically ="trms">embodied ‘meaty beings,’ and how they are usually “out of place” in the the immediate locality made in ="nms">Tehran

="trms">animals are very good at forging their own ="trms">beastly places, ‘other’ spaces of that of the human
(this is not about ‘territory’)


who “can” think and act in the ="trms">world='qstn'>?
who has the “ability” to prompt change='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[my ="nms">apass research project is in a sence ='strcls'>*contemplating the ="trms">agency='strcls'>* and speculating ='strcls'>*relocating qualities='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> (re)con="trms">figuration of the ="trms">world='lgc'>]

cultural cross-="trms">codings has always been constructed between ‘some’ humans and ‘some’ ="trms">animals

='strcls'>*the “source” of ="trms">agency, coined in Europe(='qstn'>?) from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries onwards='lgc'>: self-awareness, intention, thought and ="trms">language ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> properties of “consciousness”
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">History of Consciousness department in the Humanities Division of the University of California, Santa Cruz. ='at'>#entities that started to make decision deep in the ocean)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘actor-="trms">network theory’ ANT; Callon, Law, ="ppl">="ppl">Latour, ="ppl">Serres. ='at'>#the key ="trms">difference here lies in the ="trms">historical uses and mediations of objects, for humans objects are employed to solidify ="trms">social bond. ANT sees ="trms">agency emerging as an effect generated
and performed in con="trms">figurations of ="trms">different ="trms">materials. ="ppl">="ppl">Latour's work to relocate qualities.)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> New ="trms">Materialism; radical constructionism, all ="trms">world is a ="trms">poem)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> nonre="trms">presentational theory; Anderson, Harrison, ="ppl">="ppl">Stewart; critique become vita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list='lgc'>: to watch grass grow, or curious and experimental to face an o="trms">verbundance of things to be described or ="trms">imagined; concepts are lived; the subject is ="trms">present as witness to the moment in which some ="trms">worlding is about to disclose itself in some form or event. the result is a subject attached to ="trms">worlds throwing together in a sensory refrain, a ="trms">literally unbelievable image, or a muscle of ="trms">sociality or belief. theory='lgc'>: drawn through ="trms">writing into the ways that people and things venture out into reals. a ="trms">world in the ="trms">present tense is always other than its re="trms">presentation ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- another argument for ='at'>#="trms">excess='lgc'>]. nonre="trms">presentational ="trms">writing ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*a ="trms">phenomenal ="trms">method of attending and ="trms">composing='strcls'>* ='lgc'>=/= epi="trms">phenomenal='lgc'>: an expression of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready garnered انبار from scholarship. to spin out of critical thinking's bad habits='lgc'>: the prizing of prefabricated good objects over bad objects.)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Singh, ="ppl">Anand; ="trms">agency as a threshold of life with its own immanent forms of movement and flux, studying spirits and shifts in intensity)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> )
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> )


(the d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous and bizzar idea of) a pure ‘human’ ="trms">society


‘="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism’ actually ‘underestimates our humanity,’ in that the ‘="trms">anthropos’ and the ‘="trms">morphos’ together mean both that which has human shape and that which gives shape to humans (="ppl">Philo ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Wilbert > ="ppl">="ppl">Latour)
="trms">techno="trms">morphism, ="trms">zoo="trms">morphism, ...

="trms">anthropocentrism of the standard ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism critique ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> human-referenced starting-point


trophies, stuffed parts, drawings
urine, faeces and other dirts

feral ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">wild ='lgc'>=/= tame ='lgc'>=/= feral

in-between ="trms">animal-findings and ="trms">animals finding

="large lg34" stl="font-size:100%"> appropriate places of ="trms">animals='lgc'>: in ="trms">zoo or animations

(the 2016 film Fantastic ="trms">Beasts and Where to Find Them is about proper ="trms">zoology and not ="trms">animal ="trms">epistemology. here what comes after “Find Them” is crucial.)
(the developement moral identities and psychological ="trms">interiorities for Pixar's human teller in ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphist films such as Ratatouille.)
="prgrph">-we need to ="trms">imagine a new ="trms">animal geography

='strcls'>*territory='lgc'>: “...sites of a completed cycle of parentage and exchanges ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] spaces of insurmountable reciprocity.” (="ppl">Baudrillard)
(is ="ppl">Baudrillard sentimentalizing ="trms">animal territoriality='qstn'>? and giving them ‘psychic life’='qstn'>?)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Michael ="ppl">Woods='lgc'>]
...through re="trms">presentation an entity becomes ‘immutable mobiles’ (="ppl">="ppl">Latour) that allow political debate to take place by ="trms">presenting to decision-makers convincing re="trms">presentations of things which they have not directly experienced. (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Hollywood)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Avital='lgc'>]
the maternally contacting ="trms">child is menaced
it is the mother who call(ed) first
mother and ="trms">child, each the absolute ho="trms">stage of the Other

to face the immense, faceless Someone

the ="trms">nature of our encounter is on a timer
ask for subtitle if I go foreign for you. (i might go foreign for you)
in nerves sense, i am pushed and persecuted by the need to quickly tell you everything that I know ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the pedagogical instant ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> i don't think one can proceed slowly enough and pull the break in the age of rapid and fast food and acceleration.


our ="trms">verbal velocities could reach no one in a way that would truly mark or unhinge the brutal protocols of lived reality... ='qstn'>?

...who took no prisoners (...who can truly say that='qstn'>?)

(I also='qstn'>? take pleasure in) the injurious effects of ="trms">language ='lgc'>: words are bodies that can be hurled at the other, they can land in psyche or soma ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> manifesto

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(as a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader) friend is a partner in crime

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Sa'di's s="trms">cene of ="trms">writing, saying goodbye='lgc'>:
ای ساربان آهسته رو کآرام جانم می‌رود وآن دل که با خود داشتم با دلستانم می‌رود
سرو سیمینا به صحرا می‌روی نیک بدعهدی که بی ما می‌روی
بگذار تا بگرییم چون ابر در بهاران کز سنگ ناله خیزد روز وداع یاران
(="nms">iranian culture and its ="trms">relationship to farewell and khoda-hafezi, expanding it. why we find it so difficult to say goodbye, or even can't say goodbye. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- resume work with ="frds scrmbld">Mona='qstn'>?)

="ppl">Holderlin's ="trms">intervention/="trms">question='lgc'>: we arrive at the truth, Das Wahre emerges, the moment closing in on us, when we have to say goodby

in an ="nms">Iranian modality the farewell is the loci of truth, (locus='lgc'>: a place or ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical locality collecting the center of activity)

(the so-called) ="trms">poet's radical exposures



is violence in ="trms">farsi='lgc'>: ‘azar’ آزار='qstn'>? (how would that change instead of ‘khoshunat’ خشونت='qstn'>?)
kam-azari کم آزاری, bi-azari بی‌ آزاری (possible='qstn'>?)

eshgh عشق ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= bi-niazi بی‌ نیازی

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

demography of violence and nonviolence

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(="ppl">Freud ='lgc'><='lgc'>--) ='strcls'>*liability='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Levinas)
not yet guilty, an almost predis="trms">position, an almost inclination toward being guilty, an openness to being guilty (='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? ="frds scrmbld">Seba's notion of ‘Schuld’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= debt, the ="trms">obligation to pay or do something='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> super-egoic formation (='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? that which we call “raising awareness”)
Trauma is structuring='strcls'>***
(to be noted that the concern of super-egoic formation rests on the structuring of ‘="trms">demand,’ which is not the being of ‘="trms">question’ that it wants to be. ="trms">question is risky and consequential of new ="trms">articulation)

='lgc'>[dis="trms">position='lgc'>: vaz’ وضع, halat حالت, mezaj مزاج, seresht سرشت, khu خو, khim خیم, saz ساز,='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[predis="trms">position='lgc'>: este'dad استعداد, amadegi آمادگی, meyl-e ghabli میل قبلی; a liability or tendency to suffer from a particular condition='lgc'>]

super-ego ='lgc'>[that part of you that exercises ="trms">authority, “I am gonna make you swallow this” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> jouissance='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? Div-mardom دیو مردم (paternal correctional voice, “don't drink!” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Nezami) ='lgc'>=/= Div (says “benush!” بنوش)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(with ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway;) the ="trms">relation between what counts as ="trms">nature and what counts as culture (in ="nms">Tehran)='lgc'>--judging whether a behavior is the stuff of genes or rearing
the domestic ="trms">animal is the epoch-changing tool ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (free) wolf/dog (servant) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> civilization

what are the things we hate in the name of ="trms">Wilderness (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> “fall” into culture)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="trms">lecture at ="nms">apass, 10.03.2017='lgc'>]

i follow the scribbles of jamming and jam session

welcome to this ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical place

like you, i am also sometimes in heaven, sometimes in hell, in no-land, nowhere, elsewhere, in Belgium; also ="trms">interested deeply in what signals my and our arrival in the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical entity of Belgium. like ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian, as i am fantasizing his excursion that i missed, we went out and walked back into the city, studying what really signals our arrival, when and how and where on the body we feel that we are there. and my guess is that it is always ="trms">technological. but in an another universe your arrival might be registered by ="trms">greeting. and in an ="nms">Iranian sense...

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

my ="trms">lecturing, when it is about going after a term or a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor or a sub="trms">phenomena or a paraconcept, ='lgc'>{to arrive at its essential qualities or range, its meaning and ="trms">historical rootedness, how does it hold things together, what holds it together (in related but ="trms">different speculative milieu,) its ="trms">intractable necessity, its ghostly effectiveness, its ="trms">phenomenological maintenance, in which framework they maneuver, and so on='lgc'>} is a tentative ="trms">intervention that i reside in the weaker neighborhoods of thought, even vandalizing (="trms">authoritative knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge-)claims of legitimacy and abandoning the controlling of possibilities of comprehension.
="prgrph">-(purposeful='qstn'>?) anarchy of ="trms">questioning, un="trms">folding my thoughts anarchically

='strcls'>*not to work on X in order to get the point across that one remains susceptible (mosta'ed مستعد, dar khatar در خطر, dar ma'raz در معرض) to and in need of X ='lgc'>: what X almost was, or is still about to be
(the character of X, and='qstn'>? the X-ian character)
="prgrph">-rather, ask, in what way X allows an approach='qstn'>?

='lgc'>{="ppl">Avital on='lgc'>} ='strcls'>**="trms">authority, violent shores of human governance

what happened to ="trms">authority after the demotion (tanazol-e rotbe تنزل رتبه) of the “big Other” (death of God, State, ="nms">Pir, and other mostly masculinist idols)='qstn'>?
a primal impulse in the cuing of group formation; pre-givenness of our way of handling private and public spheres of encounter, domestic and foreign affairs;
="prgrph">-disappearance of ="trms">authority functions as a figure for democracy in crisis; loss of ="trms">authority and the loss of the enemy opens up ="trms">abysses in boundaries that have kept the ="trms">world recognizable

maternal (runs of) ="trms">interference (or motherly Wechsel) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> still pumping effects of ="trms">authority

="trms">authority of the breast

to slave tyranny

(who='qstn'>? insists in remaining a) non-="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader='lgc'> = solid descriptor (sharh-dahande شرح دهنده) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> transparent utterance ='lgc'>~  ="trms">rhetorically un="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluttered argument

="trms">literature is snafu

how ="trms">authorship (dead or alive) feeds ="trms">authority='qstn'>?

What has been packaged as terror can be in fact misleading.

="trms">authority is the most elusive of terms that inform ="trms">relations, and yet no politics, no family, no pride of accomplishment can exist without it

for ="ppl">Arendt, ="trms">authority is an undeletable term, key to any grasp of politics
="trms">authority ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">rhetoric of persuasion

="ppl">Plato's ="trms">authority of philosophy='lgc'>: in an effort both to ="trms">memorialize and to exact revenge for the verdict on ="ppl">Socrates. (as if ="ppl">Socrates didn't have any bullying tendencies in his persuasive energies.)
a recovery operation
the ‘need’ for ="trms">authority
(="ppl">Arendt='lgc'>:) “It was after ="ppl">Socrates’ death that ="ppl">Plato began to discount persuasion (and argument) as insufficient for the guidance of men and to seek for something ="trms">liable to compel them without using external means of violence.” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> a power that renounces power; coercion without violence, (invention of hell, is it nonviolent='qstn'>?! a more earthbound ="trms">rhetoric of persuasion='qstn'>?!)
(when we are out of master/slave ="trms">relationship) expert knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge commands confidence and obtains compliance (without force nor persuasion); soft coercion as="trms">sociated with reason ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Plato's philosopher-king ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**“="trms">Authority establishes ="trms">relationality ="trms">prior to command, promising compliance in the absence of force or argument”='strcls'>** (="ppl">Avital)

aspects of the ="trms">authority that might take in or shake up the other without harm

="trms">historical comfort zones ...and ...the ongoing torment of ="trms">worldlessness

(="ppl">Avital,) are the mourners of ="trms">authority masking another loss for which “="trms">authority” would be a cover='qstn'>?

="trms">Greek way of handling='lgc'>:
domestic affairs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> persuasion
foreign affairs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> force and violence


='strcls'>*="trms">authority of the Father
="trms">ontological proof of God's existence (Kojeve contends) rests on the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical placement of divine ="trms">authority as the ="trms">authority of the Father, who is seen as cause='strcls'>*
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> paternal ="trms">authority in power and political ="trms">authority ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> as ="trms">author of a work who exerts ="trms">authority over the ‘Oeuvre’

father/judge/="nms">Pir='lgc'>: the principal figure holding together political and ethical qualities of existence ='lgc'>~ imago (in psychoanalysis is an idealized image of someone='lgc'>--usually a parent='lgc'>--formed in ="trms">childhood), firm but benevolent caretaking, funding sources of divine ="trms">authority, hierarchical hold, ="trms">categorical imperative, a secure ground from which commands can be issued, “Achtung!”,
="prgrph">-="trms">authority subsists on borrowed transcendence
="prgrph">-="trms">authority produces effects of respectful adherence
="prgrph">-softening the space of committed citizenry (ground for political relatedness)
="prgrph">-is it possible to keep ="trms">authority separate from respect='qstn'>? what this se="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion assures='qstn'>?

(="nms">Pir's ="trms">authority nearing the) ="trms">sublime regions of human relatedness

Kojeve > What accounts for the unconditional surrender of human reactivity='qstn'>?
legitimate principle of coercion

God is always the God of our ="trms">ancestors ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> character of “tradition”

where violence begins or what gets counted as violence='qstn'>?

the discourse of effacement (امحاء emha’, self-effacement='lgc'>: withdrawing into the background, making yourself inconspicuous)

is there an ="trms">authority outside inequality='qstn'>? ="trms">responsible a="trms">symmetry, the egological space, ="trms">tropes of domination='qstn'>?

='prcnt'>%this is anout the quality of a="trms">symmetry='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----(are we still in the realm of the human='qstn'>?)

="ppl">Levinas tactics is ="trms">spectacular, he runs down patriarchy and meets the ma="trms">jestic escalade of the absolute other, he doesn't escape ="trms">internment (toghif توقیف)
='lgc'>[patriarchy='lgc'>: when it is “of course” obvious who is the mother='lgc'>]

(where do we go with helplessness directed by the destruction of the ="trms">world='qstn'>?)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Sennett='lgc'>] on ="trms">authority, trust and cooperation

...in both a subtle and a coherent ="trms">social structure

inequality makes a profound ="trms">difference in the lives of ="trms">children

“earned ="trms">authority” manages the everyday experience of inequality


cultures in which the ='strcls'>*dramaturgical display of yourself='strcls'>* is foregrounded ='lgc'>=/= diplomacy as model for ="trms">social ="trms">relationships

face="trms">book, an engineered ="trms">social ="trms">network organized for display ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">communication



in capitalism, in firms people at the top has more power but less ="trms">authority, and that is a problem.
in reverse, ="trms"nttrm="learn,clear,Clearl,Olearius">Lear loses its power but keeps his ="trms">authority, his lag on administrative change.

="large lg14" stl="font-size:105%"> ="trms">authority is a bound, a volunteriy obidience and care-giving
parent-="trms">children='lgc'>: something the ="trms">child needs desperitly, they need direction, they need people not only as guids but as witnesses of what they are doing.


the destructive charismatic authoiry in politics
tests if he/she can keep himself together

the charisma of the user on face="trms">book (marat, jonathan, etc., but both are also very good at face to face ="trms">communication)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Sennett

we don't know how to use ="trms">material objects and machines well

="trms">craftsmanship='lgc'>: the quest to make physical things well
="lsts lst1">•how the head and hand are connected
="lsts lst1">•doing something well for its own sake ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">skill (not honoured in ="trms">modern ="trms">society)
='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> free the ="trms">craftsman (="ppl">Sennett)


="large lg70" stl="font-size:113%"> in many ="trms">social ="trms">relations we do not know exactly what we need from others – or what they ought to want from us

cooperation as a ="trms">craft ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">skill of understanding and ="trms">responding to one another

="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban design is a ="trms">craft in peril (dar khatar)
="lsts lst1">•too much ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban design ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> homogeneous and ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid
="lsts lst1">•="trms">modern built forms ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> only a faint imprint of personal and shared experience

="ppl">Sennett ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (better understanding of) ‘="trms">material ="trms">craftsmanship ='lgc'>+ ="trms">social cooperation’ ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> cities better made

‘homo faber project’='lgc'>: the ancient idea of Man as his or her own maker, man as a maker of life through concrete practices
="lsts lst1">•limits on desire and will
="lsts lst1">•the experience of other people's needs (which cannot be reconciled with our own)
='lgc'>+ to recognize and honour what lies beyond us (and before us)

="trms">social ="trms">relations ='and'>& physical environment

issues of practical ="trms">skill, tool, meaning, value


='strcls'>***the rebellious ="trms">child (in me)


United States has become an intensely tribal ="trms">society
='strcls'>*tribalism='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= adverse to getting along with those who differ, solidarity with others like yourself, ='and'>& “thinking you know what other people are like without knowing them"='lgc'>], in the form of nationalism, destroyed Europe during the first half of the 20th century
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> complex ="trms">societies='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•workers flowing across borders
="lsts lst1">•="trms">different ethnicities, races and ="trms">religions
="lsts lst1">•diverging ways of sexual and family life

“The ‘self’ is a com="trms">posite of sentiments, affiliations and behaviors which seldom fit neatly together; any call for tribal unity will reduce this personal complexity.”
="prgrph">-="ppl">Sennett

(for ="ppl">Aristotle='lgc'>:) city='lgc'> = synoikismos(= coming together of people from diverse family tribes='lgc'>--each ='strcls'>*oikos='strcls'>* having its own ="trms">history, allegiances, property, family gods)
='lgc'>[some my german friends are making us all poor in not recognizing this, that similar people cannot bring a city into existence. city ="trms">obliges people to think about and deal with others who have ="trms">different
loyalties to (="trms">linguistic ="trms">differences). Germany, lacking direct experience of others, because of lesser colonial encounters in its ="trms">history, falls back on fearful fantasies with the new refugees coming. ="trms">integration, a bad ="trms">response to the problems of living with ="trms">difference='lgc'>]


(="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Robin,Robot,Robert,Robocop">Robert Putnam='lgc'>:) people who live in homogeneous local ="trms">communities appear more ="trms">sociably inclined towards and curious about others in the larger ="trms">world ='lgc'>: first- hand experience does not weaken stereotypes
="prgrph">-the case of Brussels='lgc'>: withdraw from neighbours who differ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to hibernate

attitudes
actual behavior

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]cooperation='lgc'>: an exchange in which the participants benefit from the encounter
can be informal as well as formal='lgc'>: experience of ="trms">mutual pleasure in a bar exchange gossip
difficult kind of cooperation='lgc'>: join people who='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•have separate or conflicting ="trms">interests
="lsts lst1">•do not feel good about each other
="lsts lst1">•are unequal
="lsts lst1">•do not understand one another
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">different faith ="trms">communities)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">responsiveness as an ethical dis="trms">position

rituals of civility
as small as ‘please’ and ‘thank you,’ put abstract notions of ="trms">mutual respect into practice

in the spirit of generosity, let's not ="trms">write off the banker (or the Mullah) as a human being ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> instead of “fuck you” how do we ="trms">respond to our ="trms">differences in a difficult ="trms">social environment such as contemporary ="nms">Iran ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what ="trms">skills are needed for this hard cooperation='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--="ppl">Sennett='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dialogic

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what remains from christianity after its self-deconstruction='qstn'>? (="ppl">Nancy)

(what theology doesn't know about itself='qstn'>?) recovered from the repressive power of ="trms">religion

="ppl">Nancy's “shattered ="trms">love” is the stuff of ="ppl">Hafez

='at'>#="trms">love (and ="trms">greeting='qstn'>?) doesn't belong to the realm of giveable things
="ppl">Lacan's de="trms">finition of ="trms">love consists in giving what one does not have, (filling emptiness with emptiness) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to give something i ‘would’ have='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (giving that which is not a property, not even one's self,) to give behind or beyond any subject, any self='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*the giving of the fact that i cannot possess myself='strcls'>* ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ‘to give'='lgc'> = 'to give up’
='strcls'>***="trms">love='lgc'>: to share the impossibility of being a self='strcls'>***
='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Nancy's) ‘body’ (of political thought)='lgc'>: not as an organicity, but of ="trms">community as the living to share precisely an impossibility of being-in-common (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">ontologize the ="trms">community, after the death of God, ="ppl">Rousseau='lgc'>: ="trms">community of mankind as the foundation of politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “man” comes from the “contract” and not reverse)
='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “giving” the (="ppl">Derridean) ‘gift’ cannot succeed if the giver knows about his/her gift; ='strcls'>*un="trms">presentable='strcls'>*
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> politics and the political always implies fulfillment, law, closed space, ='strcls'>*closure='strcls'>*

(="nms">Pir's) heaven of value

(="ppl">Bergson's) supplementary soul

there is a nihi="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic way in which we destroy

“everything is political” ='lgc'>=/= everything is directly ="trms">ontologically political ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> totalitarianism='lgc'>: everything belongs to law ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> make law about anything (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Plato's political theology='lgc'>: thought is founded on something; - ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Varinia, “management of justice”)

national ="trms">aestheticism

over-educated ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? brainwashed

='lgc'>[in my ="trms">lectures i am trying to teach something (="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Sa'di, etc.) in ‘a certain way,’ and that ‘certain way’ touches me and i hope touches my audience, even if one don't understand much of it at the time of ="trms">lecture. i am trying to think by the outside, what comes from outside, being touched by it. ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right now in ="nms">apass this outside consists of my (living) peers, getting their quantity of imposed ideas and try to work with that. to ‘take part'='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(how='qstn'>?) the exposure of violence becomes the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of violence (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Mona)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

a preoccupation (of someone/yours) ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> analytical solution/terms (for example ‘="trms">aesthetics’ and ‘gender’ for ="ppl">Strathern)

gift (produced to be seen) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> moments of performance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*creating a context of display='strcls'>*

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]gift='lgc'>: participate in and generate ="trms">internal ="trms">relations ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> commodities='lgc'>: participate in and generate external ="trms">relations


you gain prestige in what you give


='strcls'>*there is a lot of ambiguity about what can be seen and what cannot be seen='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this must be understood for any one who is invested in ‘showing’)
='strcls'>***='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the alternation between what you conceal and what you reveal (is='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>] at the heart of thinking about creativity, about reproduction, about the perpetuation of ="trms">society, about the perpetuation of ="trms">relations)


exchange wealth between two clan groups
wealth
="lsts lst1">•has an ="trms">aesthetic form
="lsts lst1">•has to be grown as well as exchanged
="lsts lst1">•must be accumulated privately and secretly
="lsts lst1">•must be revealed at the ='strcls'>*moment of transfer='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•has to take a proper form ='lgc'>~ recognized by others as appropriate


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">aesthetic='lgc'> = a proper form (at the moment of revelation) that other people have to ="trms">respond
(='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> european notion of ="trms">aesthetic='lgc'> = eliciting a sense of appreciation of beauty)


(my sister's wedding had/created) an appropriate form


='strcls'>**** exchange ="trms">situations ='lgc'>[shows, exhibitions, events, weddings, etc.='lgc'>] has to appear in a certain form, otherwise people will not recognize it, otherwise they fail to impress people ='strcls'>****
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad

="prgrph">-what are ="nms">Tehran's contemporary contexts in which we can see exchanges working='qstn'>?

younger people are impressing one another in terms of ="trms">consuming or participation in sports, or mobile phones, or whatever ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they create ="trms">different kinds of ="trms">relations (='at'>#telegram ="nms">iran='qstn'>?)
(how among my freinds we impress one another='qstn'>?)
younger people, invest value in ="trms">different things from what older people do


money does not have anything else but number

things that shine, things that g="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen, things that sparkle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a sense in which these objects ='strcls'>*give off a ="trms">presence='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Janina='lgc'>] and people are ="trms">affected by this

='strcls'>*quality of shininess='strcls'>* indicates the successful ="trms">intervention of ="trms">ancestral spirits ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a spiritual condition (acquainted with health)

they must display to be regarded as worthwhile

="large lg46" stl="font-size:116%"> with mobile phones='lgc'>: what is going on here, what is their value, how are they circulating, how do people regard them='qstn'>?


(ibn ebn ابن) people belong because their fathers belonged and so forth ='lgc'>+ what they give away, the (gift) shells, can be regarded as female ='lgc'>: items that have come into men's possessions (='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld">Karin's gifts)
="prgrph">-so the shells are passive objects, women are/were (traditionally), classically regarded as objects in a similar way and were given the names of shells


='strcls'>***how to think about ="trms">vocabulary:='strcls'>***
="prgrph">-i cannot start using economics of the ="trms">market to describe what i am talking about
="prgrph">-in the ="trms">vocabulary of gift exchange (="ppl">Strathern) may be able to find the ="trms">vocabulary of analysis (like an artist choosing the color)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Strathern choice='lgc'>: the ="trms">vocabulary of gift exchange might give her the ="trms">vocabulary by which to start describing, is an ='strcls'>*artificial choice='strcls'>*. the ="trms">vocabulary of the gift economy gives her a lot of terms in which to understand. but those terms are only useful for the purposes of understanding that particular set of ="trms">data, and if i then leave that ="trms">data, and if i follow these objects as they move out of the highlands, and if they became, if they came into an art ="trms">market, then absolutely what we would be dealing with is commodities='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges ='lgc'>[='at'>#SK='lgc'>], ='at'>#import function


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg66" stl="font-size:131%"> ='strcls'>*="trms">literature='lgc'> = the ="trms">question of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">matter of novels and ="trms">poems)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what is the ="trms">language of war='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Keenan > Weizman='lgc'>:) we need to understand war as discourse ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*war='lgc'> = a threatened discourse='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-The ="trms">language component of war exists in the gap between the level of destruction which is “possible” and the level of destruction which is “actually applied” in every given ="trms">situation.

when war is no longer a means but an end in itself(='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? Hezbollah

deterrence='lgc'>: a means of controlling a person's behavior through negative motivational influences

“We are law-abiding, and we go ="trms">wild.”


violence stripped of ="trms">semiotics

The logic, the reason, of conflict is thus political ... for Clausewitz, politics is essentially logic, logos, discourse, people reasoning with one another, thinking and speaking, exchanging


='at'>@Luis, why conflict could be my concern='qstn'>? because it marks the breakdown of politics, when we can no longer have a conversation, engage in the game, where there is no possibility of further exchange, there is fighting

fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> use of force

Saskia Sassen called the attacks of September 11 “A Message From the Global South”
she wrote that the attacks bore witness to a fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure in ="trms">communication or to a “="trms">translation problem”
for her the ="trms">language of September 11 attacks was clear
Sassen's d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous and depraved rationalization of September 11='lgc'>: south is speaking in a ="trms">language that needs no ="trms">translation



the word ‘conflict’ (is coined as a discoursive necessity and) bears with itself an analysis of politics which sees it as a rational enterprise, a structured confrontation or conversation aimed at compromise or reconciliation, the exchange of ="trms">demands and the negotiation of outcomes ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">Greek tradition ='lgc'>: to protect politics from irrationality and persuasion, and that State's monopoly of law enforcement is the only legitimate violence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (as a term) ‘conflict’ carries with itself a telos of con="trms">sensus (etefagh-e ara اتفاق آرا Übereinstimmung), agreement ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> perfect understanding ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="trms">Greek ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) democracy's dream of overcoming ="trms">internal opacities of mediation or signification, dream of a final unification, dream of a clear universal ="trms">language

(="ppl">Barthes’ ="trms">fable of) the woodcutter='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= an ="trms">agent of change='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">language='lgc'> = act (without mediation or image, operating ='strcls'>*an immediate transformation='strcls'>* ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> politic) ='lgc'>:
If I am a woodcutter and I am led to name the tree which I am cutting down ='lgc'>[j'abats='lgc'>], whatever the form of my sentence, I speak the tree, I do not speak about it. This means that my ="trms">language is operative, linked to its object in a ="trms">transitive way; between the tree and myself, there is nothing but my labor, that is to say, an act. This is a political ="trms">language='lgc'>: it ="trms">presents ="trms">nature to me only to the extent that I am going to transform it, it is a ="trms">language by which I act the object; the tree is not an image for me, it is simply the meaning of my action. But if I am not a woodcutter, I can no longer speak the tree, I can only speak of it, about it.
='at'>@="nms">apass ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Femke

(="ppl">Barthes='lgc'>:) political='lgc'> = operative (='lgc'>~ active, transformative, destructive) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is an important ="trms">fable for artists

talking about ‘conflict’ is also like this, is a “political” speech, an “operative” ="trms">language, it “="trms">presents” the object of my action to me, which is democracy, and not Colombia

(some ="trms">figurative ‘violence of ="trms">language’ ='lgc'>=/= ='lgc'>[="ppl">Austin, ="ppl">Derrida, ="ppl">Butler ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=>='lgc'>] i am talking about paying attention to) the ="trms">language used in a certain manner by certain ="trms">agents ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> studying in KHM media school teaches me to be careful with the erasure of distance, mediation, reference, re="trms">presentation, to be careful with the collapse of hermeneutic (in any discourse) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the labor of transparency ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Mona ='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali ='lgc'>]



(the very strange claim ='lgc'>[made by political leaders='lgc'>] that) force is a kind of ="trms">language, and not just any ="trms">language. It is one which solves the problem that seems endemic to all things ="trms">linguistic, namely='lgc'>: fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure, indirection, misunderstanding, drift. ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]that the ="trms">language of force actively and successfully delivers its message ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">fable='lgc'>: “everybody understands the ="trms">language of force” (unlike ordinary, diplomatic, political ="trms">language) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readability or ="trms">communicative power of the utterance, violence is seen as continuous with discourse ='lgc'>--='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Mona
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]violence='lgc'>: “speaking the (only) ="trms">language of the other” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (very strange ="trms">fable='lgc'>:) that violence is non="trms">interpretive direct(='lgc'>~ umediated) and nonanalytic, that it is unmisunderstandable, that it takes hold and transforms its ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listener ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fantasy of ="trms">affective ="trms">communication='lgc'>], hermeneutic and cognitive of the ="trms">language is effaced and what is left is only ='strcls'>*delivery='strcls'>* itself ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali's way of talking has a hint of this (a self-erasing speech,) he “delivers” his (political) message to me ='at'>#tattooing me ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the silencing/elimination of his ="trms">interlocutor, ='strcls'>**the little annihilatory ="trms">gestures='strcls'>** of my friends='lgc'>], that it ='lgc'>[violence='lgc'>] aspires to a ='strcls'>*pure ="trms">present='strcls'>*

="lsts lst1">•this is a ="trms">translational problem='qstn'>? ="ppl">Keenan
="lsts lst1">•how do we know when things cannot get any worse='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•when/where the ="trms">translation should stop='qstn'>? ='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali ='at'>@="frds">Sina ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is about the ethical risks (we are making all the time) in mistaking an annihilatory ="trms">gesture for a discursive or political one


there is no ="trms">language which needs no ="trms">translation (not even violence)

='strcls'>*="trms">translation='lgc'>: an active ="trms">relation between and within ="trms">languages ='lgc'>=/= to overcome ="trms">language ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is exaclty where the name politics ought to be reserve (Ranciere) (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>that is why i am doing political work ='lgc'>[='mywrk'>my work on='lgc'>: discordant objects of reference, misunderstanding, active deconstruction, etc. my ‘personal ="trms">responsibility’ to insist on space of difficult ="trms">translation='lgc'>])


unilateralism of an im="trms">position='lgc'>: universality of human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights
(="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>:) human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights='lgc'> = standardization of the ="trms">rhetorics of claims we make on each other ='lgc'>--therefore='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an open and undefined field of operation (and not some essence about humanity, nor law. ="ppl">Keenan is helping me not to think of human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights as an old ="trms">fashioned, transcendental, essentia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, ="trms">ontological discourse, grounding de="trms">finitional basis, ="trms">categorically an enemy's discourse)



military ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban research (employing critical theory) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> use of theory as the ultimate ‘smart weapon’
="prgrph">-="ppl">Deleuzian theory influences military tactics and manoeuvres ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a form of discourse between enemies
contemporary military theorists (in US TV series, re-conceptualizing the ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban domain)
...military with the spatial and organizational models and modes of operation advanced by Artificial Intelligence, swarm intelligence, ="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari, Gregory ="ppl">="ppl">Bateson, ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, ="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord, ="ppl">Bataille,


conflicted peace and peaceful conflict
competitive military buildup

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Keenan on working with images politically ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*politics of exposure (or revelation ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> forensic)='strcls'>*
(increasingly important dimension of political) ='strcls'>*image-making='strcls'>*='lgc'>:
='lgc'>--more='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the event takes place in order to be photographed and reproduced and rebroadcast, transmitted and distributed, copied and viewed ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dissolution of the obvious political spaces ='lgc'>=/=
='lgc'>--less='lgc'>='lgc'>--> making visible something that is otherwise hard to see (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= converting observation or visualization into knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in hopes that some kind of action will come about, based on the rational, reasonable, deliberate ="trms">interpretation of those images) (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a lot of ="trms">social justice activists, human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights organizations, and civil ="trms">society practitioners are still working within this realm of the traditional image)

a bad (revelatory) theory of the (rational democratic) public sphere ='lgc'>: “visual re="trms">presentation of things ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> known to a wider public ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge properly considered ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> wise decisions ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> actions”
='lgc'>=/= (a more properly) political moment of='lgc'>: inscribe images ='lgc'>--within='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">narrative or a persuasive project ='lgc'>--within='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a campaign that actually ="trms">narrates them (captions them, makes them more available for some kind of political action) and doesn't just take for granted that their meaning follows automatically

the way performative dimension involves a kind of action that doesn't pass through the same cognitive circuits or the same process of knowing (in images)

="lsts lst1">•living by the image
="lsts lst1">•vulnerable to the exposure of the distortion or falseness of the image

to get a rich sense of the political context in which you operate (knowing about the ="trms">history, knowing what the local forces are, who the actors are, and so on) ='lgc'>=/=  ethically-self-confident political movement reassured by the quality of their own good intentions ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> skip over a lot of local analysis, research, or ="trms">interaction

...is it a humanitarian catastrophe (a crisis of suffering) or genocide (a crisis of an
ideological ="trms">sort)
quasi-raw ="trms">material of images ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">coding, contextualization, ="trms">narration,

the bad ="trms">stories and fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures (in our lifetime) that do need to be excavated and thought about

="ppl">Keenan ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*the fantasy of being able to move so directly from knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge to action that one almost skips the moment of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge altogether='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--example='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ ="ppl">Barthes in his woodcutter='lgc'>: a woodcutter in cutting the tree manages to avoid ="trms">language (something that needs no ="trms">translation, the woodcutter in unilateral ="trms">relation to the tree), in which “="trms">language” is re="trms">presentation, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge as re="trms">presentation, “act the things” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Barthes skips over all the opacities and paradoxes and difficulties of re="trms">presentation and just goes after the tree directly

='strcls'>*there are ="trms">demands which are placed on you that won't wait for the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that is necessary='strcls'>* (or ="trms">situations in which you might feel as though you've been overwhelmed by too much knowledg)

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: (when) one has to act in a way for which the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge doesn't provide a full alibi ='lgc'>~ one's action is in some important way disconnected, or not entirely saturated by one's knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

every event (take September 11) is rich in ="trms">translation, a moment when an enormous number of competing ="trms">narrative frames were al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready available for understanding or processing or
="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading what is at stake ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> there is no unequivocal act


='strcls'>*witness='lgc'>: (in the fantasy of the act) the witness for whom no ="trms">translation is necessary='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="ppl">Levinas-="ppl">Blanchot-="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ho="trms">stage (='thdf'>for example images of Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, the media, the public event takes us ho="trms">stage)='lgc'>: a ="trms">position of extreme passivity that is equally the most intense experience of ="trms">responsibility

="prgrph">-what is the political effect of revelation='qstn'>? ='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali

beyond the immediate shock effect of the images ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they are testament to the ways in which many ="trms">different political actors make use of them (over a long period of time) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> with ="trms">interestingly ="trms">different outcomes

...="trms">intermediate space between a traditional secret (susceptible to revelation and exposure and delegitimization) and a kind of increasing public acceptance (that the ="trms">question of torture could be openly discussed='lgc'>: “it's not an absolute, there are moments when, there are individuals for whom...”) ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> public discussion

="large lg66" stl="font-size:117%">
the too high threshold for entry into political discussion (or resetting political ="trms">agendas) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the mythic completely innovative inaugural ="trms">agenda-setting event ='lgc'>=/= low-threshold ideas (look like ='strcls'>*reactive='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==constitute='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> pro="trms">position about a very ="trms">different way that the future should be organized)

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Pierre, ="nms">apass='lgc'>: placing something into the political sphere ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pure innovation (the mythic alternative='lgc'> = completely innovative inaugural ="trms">agenda-setting event) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> the too high threshold for entry into political discussion ='lgc'>=/= low-threshold ideas (might look like ='strcls'>*reactive='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==constitute='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> pro="trms">position about a very ="trms">different way that the future should be organized)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•slight shift in emphasis
="lsts lst1">•slight shift in ="trms">interpretation
="lsts lst1">•a little re-de="trms">finition
="lsts lst1">•a reactive mimicry
="lsts lst1">•




expendable people targeted for discrimination, injury and death, in a continuing wave of violent economic, psychic, ="trms">social, political, medical and juridical assaults


="ppl">Keenan on the possibility that justice might not be simply possible

deconstruction's ethico-political pertinence='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•reference to its thematic or referential considerations of issues (ethics, race, feminism, etc.)
="lsts lst1">•its formal homologies with political ="trms">interventions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> deconstruction of ="trms">authority as liberating ideology-critique
="lsts lst1">•ruin the ="trms">categories on which political discourse and re="trms">liable knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge found itself
='lgc'>}='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> axiom='lgc'>: ethics and politics are ="trms">matters of choice ='lgc'>: determinations and acts of a subject with an identity (whether strong or weak) held to be ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]free='lgc'>: capable of understanding and ="trms">integrating that knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge with a ="trms">response to the ="trms">demand to act
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]subject='lgc'>: name of the time and place in which knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge can be ="trms">articulated, ='strcls'>*the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right to the passage from knowing to doing='strcls'>*

undecidability ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Derrida
un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readability ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">de Man

="prgrph">-what is more radically unsettling than criticism='qstn'>? (...="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading)
='at'>@="frds">Sina

“the subject who ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads is the subject who choose” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">responsibility

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Eichmann ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> faced a legal forum
Mengele's skull ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> faced a ="trms">scientific forum
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Keenan='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (two ="trms">different discursive operations) each ='strcls'>*inaugurates='strcls'>* a fundamental concept and practice within the politics and ="trms">epistemology of war crimes investigations

='strcls'>*cultural turn towards testimony='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the speech of the witness

='lgc'>[='qstn'>?we are in the='lgc'>] era of the witness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> legitimized and validated victims

dramatic and emotional
trial='lgc'>: form of ="trms">historical and political pedagogy
not merely to convict the accused but to “reach the hearts of men”

political ="trms">agency of witnesses (survivors)

="trms">narrative in war crime investigations ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> document ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= witness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forensic approach

human remains are the kind of objects from which the trace of the subject cannot be fully removed

exhumation
examination

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="frds scrmbld">Mona is actually concerned with the separation of the spheres of ethics and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
strength ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “Gewalt” ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> valere ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Vale ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> value='strcls'>*

vergüenza, a collective sentiment, of one's own dignity and self-esteem, shame
vergüenza ajena ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fremdschämen ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (one of the essential features of aidos/aidôs ='lgc'>[αἰδώς='lgc'>]) the ="trms">Greek personification of modesty
“bashfulness,” “diffidence,”
“respectful,” “reserved,” “revered,” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> vereor (or vereri)='lgc'>: in ="trms">religion, “to fear,” “to revere,” حرمت “to have respect or scruple for.” Vereor belongs to a family of words that derive from the Indo-European root ᵒswer-, meaning “pay attention,” like the ="trms">Greek horan ='lgc'>[ὁϱᾶν='lgc'>] (to look, pay attention, see)

one must take the path in exactly the op="trms">posite direction

(let's not be) persons con vergüenza ='lgc'>: persons of honor, persons of their word. It is not so much that they keep their promises, but that they are bound by the word that they have given ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they commit to cumplire='lgc'>: “to carry out,” “to accomplish a ="trms">mission,” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= “leaving your post,” ="ppl">Kafka='lgc'>]

vergüenza ='lgc'>=/= to attack the ="trms">community ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? khashm خشم indignation='lgc'>: rupture of an implicit contract based on norms and conventions

the sentiment (and performance of ="nms">Tarof in a weird way, and) of verguenza construct ="trms">relations of ="trms">social solidarity, the tie ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to give structure to the ="trms">relationship to the gods (as well as that between persons) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*aidos='strcls'>* becomes constitutive of shame civilization (that continues to mutate)

shame, sham, to “cover up” shameful parts
aischune='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*aidos='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ='strcls'>*kleos='strcls'>* “fame”) defines the ="ppl">Homeric hero, aidos precisely identifies the de="trms">finitive requirement of the hero, his “regard” for his philoi (φίλοι  royal friend/advisor of the king) and his genos (γένος, ="trms">social group claiming common descent)='lgc'>]='lgc'>: to dishonor ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= beauty, in ="ppl">Plato='lgc'>] ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to disfigure; tied to the body, and in the case of the female body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> blush, as in the sensitive plant

aidos (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= moderation ='lgc'>[provoked by the regard and expectations of the other='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*="trms">excess='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in my ="trms">lectures i usually don't respect/regard the expectations of the other='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? that which separates me from the ="ppl">Homeric hero

(these are all about the regulation of the ="trms">world)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in a way also that which ="frds scrmbld">Mona ="trms">demands
="frds scrmbld">Mona need to analyse her ="trms">question of (caused) violence and calamity='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•disposal the Promethean ="trms">technai ='lgc'>[τέχναι='lgc'>] (when she asks “who gave them the tool to kill='qstn'>?”)
="lsts lst1">•the logos ='lgc'>[λόγος='lgc'>] of the arts and discursivity (when she ="trms">demands con="trms">science and justice ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ dike, another ="trms">greek tool='lgc'>])

for ="ppl">Aristotle='lgc'>: aidos ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> clean ethics='lgc'>: pathos (an ="trms">affection that involves the body)
='strcls'>*the form of fear proper to free men='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> properties proper to truth

from aidos ='lgc'>[linked to the Latin videre (to see)='lgc'>], to vergüenza ='lgc'>[linked to the ="trms">Greek horan (to see)='lgc'>], we remain in the space of the ='strcls'>*gaze='strcls'>*

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Veena on ='strcls'>*how knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is secreted in ="trms">relation to catastrophic events='strcls'>*

‘inordinate knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> beyond the act of merely knowing
='lgc'>=/= pale intellectualized distracted archived knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it is the subject who has
to discover which aspects of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">matter to her and where her attachments lie

='lgc'>--="ppl">Veena='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (with pale or ="trms">excessive, it is not the form of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, rather) it is the way in which knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge enters the realms of the ="trms">social

those who have to endure what they cannot ignore
pale ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bare ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dark ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> filled with plenitude

="trms">different modes of knowing as means of navigating the catastrophic (='lgc'>=/= simply knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge about an object)

='strcls'>*reality does not have that frontal character='strcls'>*, (it is rather) like atmosphere, deeply embedded within context
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]context='lgc'>: the weaver's loom that is discerned within the cloth it weaves

="large lg38" stl="font-size:108%"> Donatelli ='lgc'>--destruction='lgc'>='lgc'>--> small, recurring, repetitive crises that define everyday life itself or are grown within the everyday
='strcls'>*event of traumatic loss functions as='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•an event
="lsts lst1">•a figure of thought

20th century as the century of genocides ='lgc'>: the ="trms">story of collective violence from the point of view of victims and survivors ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- we must contest this ="trms">story

="lsts lst1">•(Kleinman ='and'>& Kleinman, Mookherjee='lgc'>:) victim ="trms">stories ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> voyeurism
="lsts lst1">•(Fassin ='and'>& Rechtman='lgc'>:) ubiquity of a trauma ="trms">narrative substitutes critical engagement with the structural forces of inequality (or discrimination by a psychologizing of experience and of subjectivity)
="lsts lst1">•
="lsts lst1">•

="trms">category of the victim is not transparent ='lgc'>=/= bureaucratic legal forms through which the victim status is produced aligns with very ="trms">different kinds of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (shamanic, ritual, genealogical) to generate ="trms">different kinds of ="trms">affects

1947 Partition of India (marked by massive ="trms">inter="trms">communal killing, rape, and abduction of women) =='lgc'>=/=='lgc'>=> victim
='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> refugees, evacuee property, abducted persons

his ="trms">fictionalized account of my ="trms">responses to his ="trms">questions inspired me to think
(your ="trms">fictionalized account of my ="trms">response to your ="trms">question inspires me to think)

='lgc'>[to='lgc'>] rake the fallen leaves of ="trms">language and ="trms">literature to recreate experiences...

(usually) “treason” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> massacres and violation of human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights by governmental forces

(one is forced to see events in other countiries in the light of issues pertaining to)  ="trms">transitional justice and the global form of truth

unknown dead ="trms">imagined as hungry and thirsty ghosts
='strcls'>*the living cannot offer the dead solace because the unknown dead cannot be placed within the grid of genealogical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge necessary to make them into benign ="trms">ancestors='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-the ="trms">difference between kin and str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers, ="trms">ancestors and ghosts

='strcls'>**hospitality being offered to the str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger could also become a way of reincorporating the estranged kin='strcls'>**(='qstn'>? -="nms">iranian hospitality='qstn'>?)

the ="trms">intertwined ="trms">nature of bureaucratic power and ritual action

the dead are haphazardly buried that have to be then contained or transformed through shamanic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and ritual manipulations='qstn'>? -="ppl">Veena

="trms">modern bureaucratic procedures ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> tear apart the continuity of generational connections ='lgc'><-='lgc'>~ the work of ritual to restore connections is engaged

the ="trms">different ways we come to know something ='lgc'>=/= the experience of ‘carrying’ a knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge


...unknown dead in a milieu in which ="trms">ancestors and ghosts are not simply distant and abstract concepts but are felt with every sinew of the body, who come to haunt the descendants through dreams and apparitions ='lgc'>=/= Ta'zieh='lgc'>: ="trms">ancestors in contexts in which the ="trms">relation to the dead is com="trms">memorated primarily through national rituals

(in the Jeju uprising/massacre case that ="ppl">Veena studies) ‘victim’='lgc'>: the qualifying condition for genealogical connections to be maintained in ="trms">imagining kinship as constitutive of the ="trms">relations between the living and the dead ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= victim='lgc'>: an appeal to the ="trms">authority of subjective experience, or the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge produced by the State about the dead as victim or traitor='lgc'>]

bureaucrats (victim or traitor='qstn'>?) and shaman (="trms">ancestor or ghost='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> entanglement of ="trms">different ways of knowing and classifying

(for the survivorss of Jeju after 70 years) inordinate character of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge appears in this ="trms">world as the unbearable burden of not being able to convert your dead kin into ="trms">ancestors consigning them to a ghostly existence

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> so that the ="trms">ancestors can rest peacefully in death and less in terms of the discourse of transnational justice or human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights


reputation of a woman ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the marriage prospects of girls ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ideas of purity and honor ='lgc'>--="ppl">Veena='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “poisonous knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge” secreted by the large-scale abduction of women (in India-Pakistan Partition)

="prgrph">-cultural understanding of sex as especially polluting for a woman

="large lg58" stl="font-size:101%"> disclosure or a coming to know that a close relative had a hidden ="trms">history tied to large ="trms">historical event ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> announcing an “otherness” to a close relative with whom one had inhabited a life.

Partition ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> distortion of everyday ="trms">language itself and its bodying forth
bodily ="trms">nature of ="trms">language
="trms">poetry suffused with exquisite portraits of grief
the sense that kinship ="trms">relations themselves have become lethal

(journalism's) ="trms">trap of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge/ignorance (ruth/falsity) binary ='lgc'>[asking for formal solutions to problems of indeterminacy because of the ="trms">finitude of knowing subjects or ="trms">veiling of objects='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">Veena trying to) attend to regions of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that can turn us to change the ="trms">questions we ask

(inordinate) knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is contended with locally, diurnally, repeatedly

="ppl">Veena asking how is this knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>[catastrophic event secrete knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in the everyday='lgc'>] endured or contested; concealed or revealed; and what are ='strcls'>*rhythms='strcls'>* of these movements='qstn'>?

='strcls'>*inordinate knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-as citizens, how do we deal with the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that torture is regularly practiced as part of the security ="trms">apparatus of many democracies='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-what ="trms">responsibility do we bear for these practices that are before our eyes='lgc'>--that we cannot but help know='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-As ="trms">relational beings how do we reveal the extent of sexual violence or violent ="trms">histories of our families to our ="trms">children and to our grand="trms">children='qstn'>?

(='qstn'>?to make) ="trms">responses in terms of the cultural repertoire of one's own ="trms">society relating to the care of the dead

the necessity of embracing a mismatch between harm and healing, between not knowing and shading your eyes from what you cannot but help know ='lgc'>[-acceptance of a certain degree of ignorance as essential for life='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Ahmed, ="ppl">Sedgwick='lgc'>+Frank ='at'>@="nms">apass
installation of an automatic “anti-” (for example antibiologism, as the unshifting tenet of ‘theory’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">routinized antiessentialism='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> loss of conceptual access to an entire thought-realm='strcls'>***

immersed in a precritical understanding of the body
='thdf'>the idea of biological construction having been rendered either unintelligible or naive (in feminism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an avowed ="trms">interest in the body ='lgc'>+ a persistent distaste for biological detail)

="trms">interested in antiracism and politics of globalization ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> crucial dimension of research='lgc'>: body ='lgc'><='lgc'>== “the precarious, accidental, ="trms">contingent, expedient, striving, dynamic status of life in a messy, complicated, resistant, brute ="trms">world of ="trms">materiality, a ="trms">world regulated by the exigencies, the forces, of space and time” ='lgc'>+ the conditions under which bodies are encultured, psychologized, given identity, ="trms">historical location, and ="trms">agency


='strcls'>*(you can) speak (back) to post="trms">modernism (or democracy etc.), rather than simply speak on (your ="trms">relationship to) it='strcls'>*

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">="ppl">Hayward on the role of ="trms">embodiment in visual cultures ='lgc'>+ meaning of ="trms">animals in re="trms">presentation

='strcls'>*to envision ="trms">animal='strcls'>*='lgc'> = to visualize, to experience, to figure, to image, kinds of ="trms">species, discourses, re="trms">presentations, institutions, ="trms">histories, ="trms">epistemologies ='lgc'>+ to “="trms">imagine possible” a set of ="trms">material and ethical ="trms">relationships between ="trms">species

envisioning='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•a mode of seeing and ="trms">embodying, of immersing and inhabiting, and of ="trms">storytelling and theorizing in a ="trms">techno-="trms">scientific ="trms">world of “eye machine”
="lsts lst1">•a range of practices for ="trms">situating the “self” (that tender thing in post="trms">modernity) in places and spaces grown ="trms">thick with entanglements and consequences; a form both of “to face” and “to perceive”

="trms">aesthetic conceptions of beauty and/or ambiguity coupled with biological ="trms">epistemology and ="trms">phenomenology of the organisms ='lgc'>--in='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in Jean Painleve, Genevieve Hamon, Leni Riefenstahl, David Powell ='lgc'>==construct='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> a host of hybridized and enmeshed “encounters”

bio="trms">semiotics
="trms">zoo="trms">semiotics
="prgrph">-humanist fascist ="trms">aesthetic ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> desires to ="trms">memorialize “beautiful and unpolluted” coral ="trms">communities
="prgrph">-promise of immediate and luminous experience of “jellyfish otherness”
="prgrph">-="trms">systems (of power='qstn'>?) that constitutively produce ="trms">animal and human actors



human-="trms">animal ='lgc'>+ nonhuman-="trms">animal ='lgc'>+ ="trms">apparatuses ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> co-constitutive in the process of trying to know something about whale ="trms">ecology

(="ppl">="ppl">Hayward > ="ppl">Whitehead='lgc'>:) concrescence='lgc'>: “we” (con prefix) ere- (create) scence (sense, or the “s="trms">cene,” that which is seen), the ="trms">present is given by a consense of subjective forms. We are multiple individuals, but there are also multiple individual ="trms">agents of consciousness operant in the construction of the given.
="prgrph">-="trms">literal ="trms">materialization of a dynamic produced

photograph (only one part, a kind of lively limb, of the relay)='lgc'>:
(="nms">ajayeb style ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) a bumptious and lively event of the processes of whale studies and whales themselves ='lgc'>=/= a still record of a whale “that had been there”

the image='lgc'>: a kind of connective tissue, soliciting one's senses

solar light ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> brushed up against, even touched, the whale ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">translated through the camera ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> into film ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> into chemical bathes ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> into photo-paper ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> through my eye as a research assistant

='lgc'>}='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ‘photograph='lgc'>: ="trms">material, immanent, ="trms">interconnected’ ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> somatic intelligibility (="trms">embodiment) to my own somatic intelligence ='lgc'>~ enacted an encounter between the senses (subjective feelings) and their sense (objective knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges)

a ="trms">mutual ="trms">embodiment ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- shared in the event of the photographic space

experience of these photographs ='lgc'>[whale or telegram ="trms">animal video='lgc'>]='lgc'>: an instance of ='strcls'>*="trms">sensuous knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> way we are in some carnal modality able to touch and be touched by the substance of images (to feel a visual atmosphere envelop us)

(="ppl">Grosz's) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]perception='lgc'>: flesh's reversibility ='lgc'>~ the flesh touching, seeing, perceiving itself, one ="trms">fold (provisionally) catching the other in its own self­embrace

human/="trms">animal and ="trms">technological sensorium


="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Hayward asking how coral ="trms">communities create re="trms">presentational ruptures in photographs
="prgrph">-="frds">Sina asking how telegram virtual ="trms">communities create re="trms">presentational ruptures in the real of human-="trms">animal of ="nms">Tehran, how the enfleshed ="trms">animal mobile phone photograph touch us
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> liveliness of human="trms">animal encounters ='lgc'>[the way in which my ="trms">aesthetic and ethical senses merge with ="trms">animals in the flesh='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-how people get along in concrete, ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphic, phantasmatic ways
='strcls'>**sensible and ="trms">sensual ensembles of ="trms">materialized capacities and activities that ="trms">literally and ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorically make sense of, and to, ourselves and other ="trms">animals='strcls'>**


(="ppl">="ppl">Ihde >) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">phenomenology='lgc'>: a philosophical style that emphasizes a certain ="trms">interpretation of human experience and that, in particular, concerns perception and bodily activity ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Hayward='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a theoretical practice grounded on the carnal, fleshy, ="trms">material foundations of subjectivity as it engages and is transformed by and in the ="trms">world

we attend to='lgc'>: content ='lgc'>+ form ='lgc'>+ context


invertebrates, product of displacement and comparison, a ruinous ="trms">verb turned noun turned classification ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Hayward='lgc'>='lgc'>--> foregrounding and rethinking the syntax, optics, and heterogeneity of vertebrate and invertebrate ="trms">relationality

accountability and ="trms">responsibility in the enmeshment of knowing, doing, seeing, and being

(we need less philosophizing and more) ='strcls'>*envisioning='lgc'>: an enactment of dynamic en-figurings that imperil boundaries that clearly ="trms">differentiate self and other without the loss of ="trms">historical, cultural, and ="trms">species ="trms">specificity='strcls'>*

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

☾
light has illuminated western ="trms">stories
="lsts lst1">•God said, let there be light='lgc'>: and there was light
="lsts lst1">•solar radiance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> refracted planetary atmosphere ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> earth's watery ="trms">matter ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> lively forms

="lsts lst1">•life s[...]