[...]l stages, not in adult astages (
Ontogeny or morphogenesis
Phylogeny
ontogeny
“ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny
evolution was not so much a branched chain as a ladder
molecular systematics
evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology)
each discipline has
-its own rules of evidence
-its own professors
-its own journals
-its own vocabulary
small genetic changes was not sufficient to generate evolutionary novel structures such as teeth, feathers, cnidocysts or mollusk shells (Goldschmidt, 1940) (
(new species originate as)
that result from mutations in developmentally important loci (-macromutations)
Goldschmidt
“to convince evolutionists that evolution is not only a statistical genetical problem but also one of the developmental potentialities of organism”
(Waddington 1953 claimed
(Waddington then kaunched into a) critique of
(Francois Jacob) “Evolution by tinkering” (sare-ham-bandi
(Leigh van Valen 1973) “evolution is the control of development by ecology”
phenotypic plasticity
developmental plasticity
organism
(Hertwig concludes
context-dependent sex
genetic assimilation
life history strategies
teratology (kaj-rikht-shenasi
rewriting technique criteria (of the gene)
retro-transposon
(we have uterus because of bacterial transposons)
intestinal
enzyme, macromolecular biological catalysts, accelerating chemical reaction
using hallucinogenic to cure autism (!?)
bacterial
“individual"
immunall agencise are not (has never been) defensive, they selectively in
co-metabolism
host-diet
four major symbiosis (symbiotic things) that ruled the planet
ritual defense of a dissertation, matter of opponent
a medical theater of dissection, laid out on table with the working-class barber-surgeons laying bare structures for the disquisition (tafahos
we (should always) work in the context of joy
lost for details (for the fleshiness of ‘this’), not as a general principal or an example for something else
(the tale of understanding)
(
(how we go?) from one life-table to another life-table
(
(protestants that were never burnt enough)
we (always) remain in contamination
in our questioning and studies we (must) remain enmeshed, in a historical conjunction, in a situated way of being “this way” and not “that way”
writing is an experience of metamorphic transformation
to discover how to be compromised by ajayeb Nameh
the ways we can be lured into desiring and trusting it
how the assemblages of ajayeb generate metamorphic transformations in our capacity to affect and be affected?
ajayeb, a time when transport and itinerary were only myth
the sanctity and blessing of Muslim saints was integrally linked to local ecology and topography
that sanctification of birds and stones alerts us to an Indic and Islamic vision of humans in which we are not separated from and hierarchically superior to nature. Rather, the boundaries that separate stones, animals, humans and gods are porous as well as being non-hierarchical
The interlinked sacrality of both ecology and cosmology, of ‘kudrat’ (
There is a long Islamic tradition of seeing Nature as full of the signs (ayat
where a text or these texts (ajayeb's text and world) is
the hierarchy of created things
apex in the righteous man, reaches down into the abyss of the inanimate by many gradations (Benjamin 1969b, 104)
“undiminished contact with the creatural, even with its petrified, inanimate, lowliest stratum, that of the stone… (Hannsen 2000, 150)”. The righteous man's justice consists of his attentiveness to nature, of his giving a hearing to all created things, of understanding the language of even of inert, petrified stones. But the righteous man, in Benjamin's imaginatio[...]