[...]ity
(denying the inherent inequality
(Nietzsche hated christianity for its non-affirmation of life. for him sex was a fundamental affirmation of life, christianity's elevation of chastity (including, for example, the story of Mary's virginal pregnancy) is counter to the natural instincts of humanity, and therefore a contradiction of “natural values”.)
to
...to have no positive knowledge claim
appropriate
(let me) fast forward to ‘nowhere’
chance-encounters in your/my efforts of ecriture (in San'an text)
(it is not possible to choreograph chance, we can only report our encounters with it)
like San'an, many of us are facing an anxiety of withdrawal from the world that claims us
i am interested in to-link to that which (suddenly) interupts my reveries
to sharpen my capacity for incapacitation
not being afraid to look into many archives of mistakes (ajayeb?)
‘will to scientific knowledge’
(certain) seperation is political
when we are talking about (re)uniting curricula, linking fields in humanities we are talking about not bringing together two things that are separate, but actually interogating the distribution of power, a way a distributing agancies.
it is not a “common world” to discover, it is a common world to be produced. and the only way to produce it, is through the usual tools that we have in our disposal, which are comming from ‘representation.’
compose
enterances in ajayeb work, already generating form
“truth” is veild, according to middle east (truth
begining with the Greeks’ notion of basanos, relating truth to torture, a strictly constellated confluence of acts equally troubling to Aristotle and Aristophanes.
hermeneutics regarding Jurisprudence (feghh
interpretation/hermenutice
(ta'vil bayad dar jahate axe harkate jami va moshtarek bashad)
(Kohn) to “provincialize” (rustayi
my point in animals without narrative is that the apparatus that is working for Attar in his representation of birds is the same as the narrative tool in the so-called wildlife documentary series which produces nature
transcend is about traveling from trope to truth (obur az majaz be haghighat
the main (and only?) question in my work/performance/lecture is ‘when’ the gift will/have pass(ed) on.
-my texture aversion and preference in soft/hard fabric of language and material tonality?
-“marvels of affinity” is the key to reality, revealing how things are, what is known, and how to behave.
cosmogony (keyhan-zayi
science studies
what was science before science studies? it was engaged in a sort of stupefaction that prevented meaningful study.
we do not take the fight against X (religion, fetish, etc.) for the truth about X.
i am adding “mama's boy” (bache-nane
(book, ketabat
to do something to resignify and breakup the serenity and the serene closure of the book, as the universiy values it and seals it
-what deals does it seal?
-the commitment to breaking up the book and its
-linguistic pollutants
-dirty talks
(what would this structure mean? and how is that expandable?)
(accourding to Egyptian 1550 BCE,) book
-are lists the origin of writing? (...way before the installation of the modern scriptural apparatus)
cohabitation of two sovereign linguistic attitudes
18th century
rise of increasingly more mathematical and symbolic logics
more literary types of discursive formations,
Freud without Goethe or Schiller?!
Benjamin off Baudelaire?!
Derrida deprived of Mallarme, Ponge, or Celan?!
Heidegger abandoned by Trakl or Holderlin?!
increasing technicization of critical language
colloquy, soliloquy
they are called to witness distinct regions of being
% denken und dichten is at stake in the
the storyteller
(regarding my footno[...]